發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-24 20:46

  本文選題：國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì) + 國(guó)有企業(yè)��； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)界》2017年04期

【摘要】：中國(guó)社會(huì)各界普遍關(guān)注的是數(shù)量型充分就業(yè)而非質(zhì)量型充分就業(yè),將發(fā)展國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)視為實(shí)現(xiàn)充分就業(yè)的重要實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑。但國(guó)有經(jīng)濟(jì)是高度集權(quán)性計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)的典型特征,其低效率過度就業(yè)模式與低效率就業(yè)路徑相結(jié)合,必定會(huì)形成兩者之間的低水平劣質(zhì)均衡,從而形成經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和勞動(dòng)就業(yè)劣質(zhì)低效的"就業(yè)陷阱"。這一重要結(jié)論既具有時(shí)間維度和縱向比較的可檢驗(yàn)性,也具有空間維度和橫向比較的可實(shí)證性。如果政府就業(yè)偏好長(zhǎng)期取代個(gè)人就業(yè)偏好,劣質(zhì)低效的勞動(dòng)就業(yè)必定會(huì)導(dǎo)致國(guó)民大眾"用腳投票"。中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng)化轉(zhuǎn)型的真正障礙,就是國(guó)家所有基礎(chǔ)上的國(guó)有企業(yè)壟斷和官商一體化,因此迫切需要重建明晰排他的產(chǎn)權(quán)基礎(chǔ),并在此基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)現(xiàn)民營(yíng)化主導(dǎo)的公平競(jìng)爭(zhēng),"國(guó)退民進(jìn)"自然就會(huì)成為制度創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)的首要選擇,只有制度現(xiàn)代化和就業(yè)現(xiàn)代化才能有效引領(lǐng)中國(guó)未來的經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:All circles of Chinese society are generally concerned about the quantitative full employment rather than the qualitative full employment and regard the development of the state-owned economy as an important way to realize full employment. However, the state-owned economy is a typical feature of highly centralized planned economy. The combination of the inefficient excessive employment mode and the inefficient employment path will inevitably form a low-level and low-quality equilibrium between the two. Thus forms the economic development and the labor employment inferior inefficient "employment trap". This important conclusion has not only the verifiability of time dimension and longitudinal comparison, but also the verifiability of spatial dimension and horizontal comparison. If government employment preference replaces individual employment preference for a long time, poor quality and inefficient labor employment will surely lead the public to vote with their feet. The real obstacle to the market-oriented transformation of China's economy is the monopoly of state-owned enterprises and the integration of government and business on the basis of state ownership. Therefore, there is an urgent need to rebuild a clear and exclusive property right basis. On the basis of this, we can realize the fair competition dominated by privatization, and the "national withdrawal from the people's advance" will naturally become the first choice driven by institutional innovation, and only the modernization of system and employment can effectively lead the process of economic modernization in the future in China.
【作者單位】： 濟(jì)南大學(xué)商學(xué)院;
【基金】：作者主持的國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)勞動(dòng)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)路徑研究”(12BRK024)的部分成果
【分類號(hào)】：F272.92;F276.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 楊艷琳;“就業(yè)陷阱”論[J];高師函授學(xué)刊;1994年06期

2 柴玉泉;;警惕就業(yè)陷阱[J];農(nóng)村科學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn);2011年04期

3 宮權(quán);王飛鵬;;大學(xué)生遭遇就業(yè)陷阱的根源與防范對(duì)策[J];職業(yè)時(shí)空;2008年09期

4 高飛;;警惕就業(yè)陷阱 維護(hù)自身權(quán)益[J];新農(nóng)業(yè);2010年08期

5 顏梅生;;警惕用人單位設(shè)置的就業(yè)陷阱[J];勞動(dòng)保障世界;2010年08期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前7條

1 戎洪興;55%的大學(xué)生掉進(jìn)“就業(yè)陷阱”令誰汗顏[N];中國(guó)改革報(bào);2005年

2 北京策略律師事務(wù)所勞動(dòng)法業(yè)務(wù)部主任 景彤;勞動(dòng)者謹(jǐn)防十大就業(yè)陷阱[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2013年

3 本報(bào)記者 王璐;求職，莫忘了睜大雙眼[N];山西日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

4 見習(xí)記者 劉佳;大學(xué)生，警惕就業(yè)陷阱[N];天津教育報(bào);2010年

5 吳雙林;農(nóng)民工謹(jǐn)防就業(yè)陷阱[N];光華時(shí)報(bào);2009年

6 崔文;畢業(yè)生薪水期望開始和企業(yè)對(duì)位[N];北京人才市場(chǎng)報(bào);2006年

7 本報(bào)記者 莊嚴(yán);苦惱中的無奈[N];吉林日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1930489