發(fā)布時(shí)間：2020-12-03 04:37

　　Way構(gòu)式[SUBJi[V[POSSi way]OBL]]是英語(yǔ)論元結(jié)構(gòu)構(gòu)式的主要形式之一,是指主語(yǔ)指稱(chēng)沿著介詞短語(yǔ)所指的路徑移動(dòng),表征空間創(chuàng)路位移事件。自Goldberg（1995）的《構(gòu)式:論元結(jié)構(gòu)的構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法研究》一書(shū)發(fā)表以來(lái),way構(gòu)式的研究一直得到國(guó)內(nèi)外構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法學(xué)者持續(xù)關(guān)注。學(xué)界普遍接受Goldberg（1995）的共時(shí)構(gòu)式觀,側(cè)重對(duì)way構(gòu)式的定性描寫(xiě),具體包括準(zhǔn)入動(dòng)詞的語(yǔ)義規(guī)約、語(yǔ)義關(guān)聯(lián)度以及準(zhǔn)入動(dòng)詞與構(gòu)式的內(nèi)在融合。隨著歷時(shí)構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法的產(chǎn)生,語(yǔ)義變化、形態(tài)音位變化及搭配限制等構(gòu)式內(nèi)部變化對(duì)構(gòu)式發(fā)展的影響逐漸進(jìn)入人們的視野。如何從構(gòu)式演變的角度追蹤構(gòu)式演變的軌跡和構(gòu)式化路徑,進(jìn)而解釋語(yǔ)言演化的規(guī)律,已成為構(gòu)式研究的熱點(diǎn)。但現(xiàn)有的有關(guān)way構(gòu)式的歷時(shí)研究還不夠成熟,為數(shù)不多的歷時(shí)研究（如Israel,1996）,主要采用列舉的方式,概括way構(gòu)式在空間創(chuàng)路位移方面的變化。顯然,對(duì)way構(gòu)式發(fā)展的定性描寫(xiě)并不能充分揭示構(gòu)式內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)的動(dòng)態(tài)變化,因此有必要從實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)出發(fā),對(duì)way構(gòu)式的內(nèi)部變化進(jìn)行多維考察揭示way構(gòu)式歷時(shí)演變的內(nèi)在動(dòng)因,促進(jìn)構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法歷時(shí)研究的發(fā)展。我們認(rèn)為,way構(gòu)... 

【文章來(lái)源】：江南大學(xué)江蘇省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：128 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
摘要
ABSTRACT
Chapter One INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background of the Research
    1.2 Significance of the Research
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 A Brief Introduction of the Way Construction
        2.1.1 Definition of the Way Construction
        2.1.2 The Semantics of the Way Construction
        2.1.3 The Semantic Constraint of the Way Construction
    2.2 The Synchronic Approarch to the Way Construction
        2.2.1 From the Syntactic Perspective
        2.2.2 From the Conceptual Semantic Perspective
        2.2.3 From the Lexical Perspective
        2.2.4 From the Constructional Perspective
    2.3 The Diachronic Approach to the Way Construction
    2.4 The Grey Areas to be Studied
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    3.1 Construction Grammar
        3.1.1 The Definition of Construction
        3.1.2 The Productivity of Construction Grammar
        3.1.3 The Integration between Verb and Construction
        3.1.4 Metonymy in Construction Grammar
    3.2 Usage-based Theory
        3.2.1 Background and Assumptions of Usage-based Theory
        3.2.2 Frequency in Usage-based Theory
        3.2.3 Construction in Usage-based Theory
    3.3 Constructionalization and Constructional Change
        3.3.1 Definitions of Constructionalization and Constructional Change
        3.3.2 The Relations between Constructionalization and Constructional Change
        3.3.3 Factors of Constructional Change
    3.4 A Proposed Framework
Chapter Four RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Quantitative Corpus-based Approach
        4.2.1 Multidimensional Scaling
        4.2.2 Collostructional Analysis
        4.2.3 Collexeme Analysis
    4.3 Data Collection
        4.3.1 Working Corpus
        4.3.2 Research Procedure
    4.4 The Statistical Analysis Tool
Chapter Five RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    5.1 Verbs and Adjectives in the Way Construction
        5.1.1 Verbs in the Way Construction
        5.1.2 Adjectives in the Way Construction
    5.2 Semantic Change of the Way Construction
        5.2.1 The Semantic Change of Verbs in the Way Construction
        5.2.2 The Semantic Change of Adjectives in“V+one’s+adj.+way”
    5.3 Motivation for the Extended Productivity of the Way Construction
        5.3.1 The Frequency on the Productivity of the Way Construction
        5.3.2 The Metonymic Operation of the Way Construction
Chapter Six CONCLUSION
    6.1 Major Findings of the Research
    6.2 Implications of the Research
    6.3 Limitations and Suggestions
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
附錄： 作者在攻讀碩士學(xué)位期間發(fā)表的論文



本文編號(hào)：2896004