發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-26 03:09

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： “兩戶” 制度價(jià)值 保留 立法完善　出處：《廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：作為我國法律體系中最富有中國特色的“兩戶”制度,在不同的歷史時(shí)期發(fā)揮著不同的作用,但對(duì)其法律地位、性質(zhì)與功用等問題,無論是理論研究還是司法實(shí)踐,均存在較大爭議。在中國民法典編纂工作重新啟動(dòng)以后,這一爭議再次成為熱點(diǎn)問題之一。1986年頒布的《民法通則》規(guī)定了個(gè)體工商戶和農(nóng)村承包經(jīng)營戶。時(shí)隔三十年后,民法典總則是否必須再對(duì)“兩戶”進(jìn)行規(guī)定?如果需要,其正當(dāng)性何在以及應(yīng)當(dāng)如何規(guī)范?要回答這些問題,有必要對(duì)民事主體制度中的“兩戶”進(jìn)行全面而系統(tǒng)的梳理、剖析和研究。本文在整理分析的基礎(chǔ)之上,通過對(duì)“兩戶”制度中存在較大爭議問題的探討,為我國民法典繼續(xù)保留并完善“兩戶”制度提供理論支持。本文以“兩戶”制度為研究內(nèi)容,從四個(gè)部分展開論述。首先,概括“兩戶”的一般理論,梳理我國民商主體立法的發(fā)展史,對(duì)“兩戶”的概念、立法背景、制度價(jià)值、國內(nèi)理論研究進(jìn)行整理、歸納和總結(jié),并評(píng)述目前《民法總則》起草中關(guān)于“兩戶”制度的不同方案,目的是為了對(duì)所研究的對(duì)象有一個(gè)總體的了解與把握。其次,對(duì)“兩戶”制度的具體發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、做出的貢獻(xiàn)和存在的主要問題進(jìn)行剖析,將“兩戶”制度的歷史功用、具體情況分析透徹。再次,對(duì)大陸法系與英美法系的類似法律制度進(jìn)行立法考察,找出其中可以為我國所借鑒的規(guī)律。最后,通過“兩戶”存在的必要性與價(jià)值意義的論證,以及“兩戶”存廢問題的利弊分析,得出繼續(xù)保留“兩戶”的結(jié)論、理由并提出了具體完善建議,如建立相關(guān)配套制度、制訂“兩戶”債務(wù)承擔(dān)法律規(guī)則等,為《民法總則(草案)》相關(guān)條文的修訂提出建議。
[Abstract]:The "two households" system, which is the richest with Chinese characteristics in our country's legal system, plays different roles in different historical periods, but it has some problems such as its legal status, nature and function. Whether theoretical research or judicial practice, there is a great deal of controversy. After the work of codification of Chinese civil code was restarted. This dispute once again becomes one of the hot issues. In 1986, the General principles of Civil Law provided for individual industrial and commercial households and rural contracted operators. Thirty years later. Must the General principles of the Civil Code provide for "two households" again? If so, what is its legitimacy and how should it be regulated? In order to answer these questions, it is necessary to comb, analyze and study the "two households" in the civil subject system. Through the discussion of the controversial issues in the system of "two households", this paper provides theoretical support for the continuation and perfection of the system of "two households" in the Civil Code of China. This paper takes the system of "two households" as the research content. First of all, it summarizes the general theory of "two households", combs the history of civil and commercial subject legislation in China, and collates the concept, legislative background, system value and domestic theoretical research of "two households". Summarize and summarize, and comment on the different schemes of "two households" system in the drafting of "General principles of Civil Law" at present, in order to have a general understanding and grasp of the object of study. Secondly. The "two households" system of the specific development of the status quo, the contributions made and the main problems are analyzed, the "two households" system's historical function, the specific situation is thoroughly analyzed. This paper makes a legislative investigation on the similar legal systems of the civil law system and the Anglo-American legal system, and finds out the law which can be used for reference in our country. Finally, the necessity and value significance of the existence of "two households" are demonstrated. As well as the advantages and disadvantages of the "two households" savings and scrapping analysis, the conclusion that continues to retain "two households", the reasons and put forward specific suggestions, such as the establishment of a supporting system, the formulation of "two households" debt bearing legal rules and so on. To make suggestions for the revision of the relevant articles of the General principles (draft) of Civil Law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹興權(quán);;民法典如何對(duì)待個(gè)體工商戶[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2016年06期

2 楊震;;民法總則“自然人”立法研究[J];法學(xué)家;2016年05期

3 梁慧星;;《中華人民共和國民法總則(草案)》:解讀、評(píng)論和修改建議[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期

4 趙萬一;;婚姻家庭法與民法典關(guān)系之我見——兼論婚姻家庭法在我國民法典中的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年09期

5 李永軍;;我國未來民法典中主體制度的設(shè)計(jì)思考[J];法學(xué)論壇;2016年02期

6 申惠文;;論農(nóng)村承包經(jīng)營戶的死亡[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

7 陳龍吟;侯國躍;;中國民法典民事主體立法問題研討會(huì)會(huì)議綜述[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

8 萬建華;鐘菲;;淺析民法典總則對(duì)個(gè)體戶及承包戶的體系安排——以中國法學(xué)會(huì)《民法總則專家建議稿(征求意見稿)》為例[J];中國商法年刊;2015年00期

9 王立爭;;農(nóng)戶主體地位的法政策學(xué)辨思[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期

10 楊立新;;《中華人民共和國民法總則(草案)》建議稿[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1464493