發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-19 16:16

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 古籍整理 作品 鄰接權(quán) 不正當(dāng)競爭行為　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：文明的傳承需要諸多的載體,這其中一個(gè)重要層面就是傳世古籍的整理與保護(hù),但是目前古籍整理成果的保護(hù)卻遇到諸多問題。對(duì)古籍整理成果能否構(gòu)成作品,以及不能構(gòu)成作品時(shí)該如何尋求法律保護(hù)等問題在理論和實(shí)務(wù)中都還存在巨大爭議。在此基礎(chǔ)上,全文的寫作目的在于通過歷史文獻(xiàn)學(xué)的科學(xué)方法對(duì)古籍整理成果予以分類,提出了并不是所有的古籍整理成果都能構(gòu)成作品這一觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)不能構(gòu)成作品的古籍整理成果提出了通過鄰接權(quán)和反不正當(dāng)競爭法的方式予以保護(hù)的建議。文章除了緒論和結(jié)語共包括四個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章節(jié)論述了古籍整理成果的保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀及保護(hù)的必要性。第二章節(jié)在文獻(xiàn)學(xué)意義上界定古籍整理成果各種形式并著重探討各種形式的古籍整理成果是否能成為著作權(quán)意義上的作品。第三章節(jié)尋求不能構(gòu)成作品的古籍整理成果的鄰接權(quán)保護(hù)路徑,在本部分通過對(duì)鄰接權(quán)功能的追溯,去論證古籍整理成果保護(hù)與鄰接權(quán)功能的契合性,去提出用鄰接權(quán)去保護(hù)不構(gòu)成作品的古籍整理成果,并給出了在現(xiàn)行法律之下鄰接權(quán)保護(hù)古籍整理成果所需要的具體權(quán)利擴(kuò)張模式。第四章節(jié),從反不正當(dāng)競爭法適用角度出發(fā),對(duì)保護(hù)古籍整理成果知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的可行性進(jìn)行了分析,本部分筆者先論述了反不正當(dāng)競爭法保護(hù)古籍整理成果知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的可行性及局限性,繼而對(duì)古籍整理成果在整理和出版中在先和在后的古籍出版商或者古籍整理者常遇到的各種各樣的侵權(quán)問題是否構(gòu)成不正當(dāng)競爭行為進(jìn)行了相關(guān)探討。綜上,筆者認(rèn)為并不是所有古籍整理成果都能成為著作權(quán)意義上的作品,因此對(duì)于古籍整理成果的保護(hù)措施不能一概而論,需要具體情況具體分析,如果著作權(quán)不能保護(hù),可以考慮用鄰接權(quán)或者反不正當(dāng)競爭法來保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:The inheritance of civilization needs a lot of carriers, one of which is the collection and protection of ancient books, but the protection of the achievements of ancient books arrangement is met with many problems. And how to seek legal protection when the work can not be constituted is still a huge dispute in theory and practice. On this basis. The purpose of this paper is to classify the achievements of ancient books collation through the scientific method of historical philology and put forward the view that not all the results of the collation of ancient books can constitute works. The paper also puts forward some suggestions on how to protect the ancient books which can not form part of the works. Besides the introduction and conclusion, the article includes four chapters. The first chapter discusses the collation of ancient books. The second chapter defines the various forms of the ancient book arrangement in the sense of philology and probes into whether the various forms of the ancient book arrangement can become the works in the sense of copyright. The three chapters seek the way to protect the neighboring rights which can not constitute the achievements of the collation of ancient books. In this part, through the tracing of the function of neighboring rights, to prove the consistency between the protection of ancient books collation achievement and the function of neighboring rights, to put forward to use neighboring rights to protect the results of ancient books collation that do not constitute works. And gives the specific rights expansion model needed to protect the ancient books under the current law. 4th chapter, from the perspective of the application of anti-unfair competition law. The author analyzes the feasibility of protecting the intellectual property rights of ancient book collation achievements. The author first discusses the feasibility and limitation of anti-unfair competition law to protect the intellectual property rights of ancient book collation achievements. Then this paper discusses whether the various infringement problems often encountered by the ancient book publishers or the ancient book collators in the collation and publication of ancient books are related to the unfair competition behavior. The author thinks that not all the achievements of ancient books collation can become the works in the sense of copyright, so the protection measures of the results of the ancient books collation can not be generalized, and the concrete situation should be analyzed concretely. If copyright cannot be protected, consider using neighboring rights or anti-unfair competition laws.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4;G255.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋頌;;表演者權(quán)的迷失與回歸 兼評(píng)《著作權(quán)法》送審稿相關(guān)條款[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年07期

2 宋慧獻(xiàn);;古籍整理成果的著作權(quán)保護(hù):尋求立法突破[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2015年07期

3 韓松博;;古籍校點(diǎn)作品著作權(quán)問題探析[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

4 林華;;大數(shù)據(jù)的法律保護(hù)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年08期

5 袁博;;論古文點(diǎn)校智力成果可版權(quán)性的證偽[J];中國版權(quán);2013年05期

6 何懷文;;古籍點(diǎn)校本的法律保護(hù):特設(shè)民事權(quán)益與著作權(quán)之外第三條出路[J];中國出版;2013年13期

7 王遷;;古文點(diǎn)校著作權(quán)問題研究——兼評(píng)“中華書局訴國學(xué)網(wǎng)案”等近期案例[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

8 王超政;;科技推動(dòng)下的鄰接權(quán)制度體系構(gòu)建[J];中國版權(quán);2013年02期

9 姚泓冰;;古籍點(diǎn)校作品的著作權(quán)探析[J];太原大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

10 張今;;古籍整理作品的著作權(quán)問題[J];出版參考;2012年21期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 嚴(yán)永和;王雅宇;;如何保護(hù)古籍點(diǎn)校成果的著作權(quán)？[N];中國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)報(bào);2015年

2 鐘華生;;點(diǎn)校古籍一點(diǎn)也不簡單[N];深圳商報(bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1444923