發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-31 00:45

  本文選題：產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯 + 決定因素�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，隨著各國經(jīng)濟(jì)的逐漸發(fā)展，貿(mào)易競爭日趨激烈，各國對外貿(mào)易關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)已經(jīng)從出口產(chǎn)品數(shù)量的多少漸漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)槌隹诋a(chǎn)品質(zhì)量的高低。但如何衡量出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量仍沒有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。究竟我國出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量在世界出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯中處于什么地位，由哪些因素決定，這都是本文進(jìn)行研究的要點(diǎn)。 本文首先運(yùn)用Khandewal（2010）的質(zhì)量階梯測度模型對2002-2011年中國制造業(yè)出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯分行業(yè)進(jìn)行測度，分析我國制造業(yè)出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯的變化趨勢。結(jié)果表明，我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量在加入世貿(mào)組織經(jīng)歷小幅波動后整體上逐漸提高，其中技術(shù)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)提高明顯。而后，測度加拿大、日本、歐盟、亞洲四小龍、巴西、墨西哥、印度、東盟等八個(gè)國家或地區(qū)的制造業(yè)出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯。結(jié)果顯示，所有國家質(zhì)量階梯情況類似，均是電腦及電子技術(shù)產(chǎn)品較長，石油及煤產(chǎn)品、印刷設(shè)備較短。并且分行業(yè)對比后發(fā)現(xiàn)，我國紡織品、印刷設(shè)備等勞動密集型行業(yè)排名降低，電腦及電子技術(shù)產(chǎn)品、電氣設(shè)備及電器組件等技術(shù)密集型行業(yè)排名上升，，但仍有部分技術(shù)密集型行業(yè)排名中下游水平。隨后，在行業(yè)質(zhì)量階梯的基礎(chǔ)上加權(quán)平均計(jì)算各國總體的出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯水平，對比分析得出，我國產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量水平與墨西哥水平相當(dāng)，明顯高于巴西、印度，但低于日本、歐盟等發(fā)達(dá)國家。 利用計(jì)算出的質(zhì)量階梯數(shù)據(jù)，本文在祝樹金、張鵬輝（2013）的基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建計(jì)量模型，考察出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯的決定因素。通過GLS和系統(tǒng)GMM方法回歸得出，研發(fā)強(qiáng)度、外商直接投資、進(jìn)口貿(mào)易有利于出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯的攀升，但外商直接投資和進(jìn)口貿(mào)易需要一定的時(shí)滯；人均資本并不起到提升出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量的作用。當(dāng)加入人力資本、企業(yè)規(guī)模、企業(yè)數(shù)目和行業(yè)總利潤等控制變量后，也對出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量階梯的提升具有明顯的促進(jìn)作用。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the gradual development of national economy and the increasingly fierce trade competition, the focus of foreign trade has gradually changed from the quantity of export products to the quality of export products. But how to measure the quality of export products is still not a unified standard. What is the position of China's export product quality in the world export product quality ladder, and by what factors, which is the main point of this paper. In this paper, we first use the quality ladder measurement model of Khandewalan 2010 to measure the quality ladder of Chinese manufacturing export products from 2002 to 2011, and analyze the changing trend of the quality ladder of Chinese manufacturing export products. The results show that the product quality of China's manufacturing industry has been improved gradually after entering WTO, and the technology-intensive industry has improved obviously. Then, we measure the quality ladder of eight countries or regions, such as Canada, Japan, EU, Asia, Brazil, Mexico, India, ASEAN and so on. The results show that the quality ladder is similar in all countries, with long computer and electronic products, petroleum and coal products and short printing equipment. And by industry comparison, we found that the ranking of labor-intensive industries such as textiles, printing equipment and other industries in China decreased, while the ranking of technology-intensive industries such as computer and electronic products, electrical equipment and electrical components rose. But there are still some technology-intensive industries ranked in the lower-down level. Subsequently, on the basis of the industry quality ladder, the weighted average calculation of the overall export product quality ladder level of each country shows that China's product quality level is comparable to that of Mexico, which is significantly higher than that of Brazil, India, but lower than that of Japan. The European Union and other developed countries. Based on the calculated quality ladder data, this paper constructs a measurement model on the basis of Zhu Shujin and Zhang Penghui / 2013 to investigate the determinants of the quality ladder of export products. Through the regression of GLS and systematic GMM, it is concluded that R & D intensity, foreign direct investment and import trade are conducive to the climbing of the quality ladder of export products, but foreign direct investment and import trade need a certain delay; Capital per capita does not play a role in improving the quality of export products. When human capital, enterprise size, the number of enterprises and the total profit of the industry are added, the quality ladder of export products can be promoted obviously.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F424;F752.62;F203

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉智勇;胡永遠(yuǎn);;異質(zhì)型人力資本對技術(shù)進(jìn)步的影響研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年02期

2 殷德生;;中國入世以來出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量升級的決定因素與變動趨勢[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年11期

3 盧荻;黎貴才;;外商直接投資在中國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的作用評價(jià)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年07期

4 馮根福;劉軍虎;徐志霖;;中國工業(yè)部門研發(fā)效率及其影響因素實(shí)證分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年11期

5 劉偉麗;陳勇;;中國制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)質(zhì)量階梯研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年11期

6 鮑曉華;金毓;;出口質(zhì)量與生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)步:收入分配的影響力[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2013年08期

7 鄭昭陽;孟猛;;中國對外貿(mào)易的相對技術(shù)水平變化分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年10期

8 張會清;唐海燕;;產(chǎn)品內(nèi)國際分工與中國制造業(yè)技術(shù)升級[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年06期

9 殷德生;唐海燕;黃騰飛;;國際貿(mào)易、企業(yè)異質(zhì)性與產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量升級[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年S2期

10 賴明勇 ,包群 ,陽小曉;我國外商直接投資吸收能力研究[J];南開經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年03期

本文編號：1957583