發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-08 13:43

  本文選題：教育貧困　切入點(diǎn)：教育投資收益率　出處：《中國人口科學(xué)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在中國整體貧困發(fā)生率顯著下降的同時(shí),教育貧困卻并未減少,甚至出現(xiàn)了反彈現(xiàn)象。文章利用1991~2011年中國健康與營養(yǎng)調(diào)查(CHNS)數(shù)據(jù),通過測算教育投資收益率和工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)對工資收入波動(dòng)的影響,揭示教育貧困"不降反升"的原因。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),城鄉(xiāng)均存在"教育投資陷阱",農(nóng)村地區(qū)教育投資收益率"極化"特征更明顯,教育貧困程度更深,低學(xué)歷個(gè)人的教育投資收益率"倒掛"現(xiàn)象是教育貧困"不降"的主要原因;工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)對低學(xué)歷個(gè)人的工資收入波動(dòng)影響更大,且低學(xué)歷個(gè)人的工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)系數(shù)值存在"倒掛"現(xiàn)象,這是教育貧困"不降"的另一原因。2000年之后農(nóng)村低學(xué)歷個(gè)人的工資收入方差波動(dòng)區(qū)間不斷擴(kuò)大,是農(nóng)村教育貧困"反升"的主要原因。進(jìn)一步分析表明,低學(xué)歷個(gè)人的工資收入更容易受到個(gè)人屬性(健康狀況、性別等)的影響,而高學(xué)歷個(gè)人的工資收入更多地取決于工作行業(yè)和崗位。
[Abstract]:While the overall incidence of poverty in China has decreased significantly, education poverty has not decreased, and even rebounded. This paper uses CHNSdata from the China Health and Nutrition Survey from 1991 to 2011. By measuring the impact of the rate of return on education investment and work experience on the fluctuation of wage income, this paper reveals the causes of "not decreasing but rising" in education poverty. There is "education investment trap" in both urban and rural areas, and the characteristics of "polarization" of the rate of return on education investment in rural areas are more obvious, and the degree of education poverty is deeper. The phenomenon of "upside down" of the rate of return on education investment of individuals with low educational qualifications is the main reason for "not falling" in education poverty. Work experience has a greater impact on the fluctuation of salary income of individuals with low education, and the coefficient of work experience of individuals with low education has a phenomenon of "hanging upside down". This is another reason for "not falling" in education poverty. Since 2000, the fluctuation range of income variance of low educated individuals in rural areas has been increasing, which is the main reason for the rise of education poverty in rural areas. Further analysis shows that. Low-educated individuals are more vulnerable to personal attributes (health status, gender, etc.), while higher-educated individuals are more dependent on the industry and position
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項(xiàng)目“應(yīng)對中等收入陷阱挑戰(zhàn)的綜合研究”(編號:11&ZD006)的階段性成果
【分類號】：G521

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 邵元;教育的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益[J];教育與經(jīng)濟(jì);1987年03期

2 江天;;教育經(jīng)濟(jì)效益的計(jì)算[J];成人教育;1983年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 韓春蕾;江蘇省高等教育個(gè)人投資收益率研究[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1584136