本文選題：初中 + 中美��； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：義務(wù)教育階段的生物學(xué)課程是以提高學(xué)生生物科學(xué)素養(yǎng)為主要目的的學(xué)科課程,是科學(xué)教育的重要領(lǐng)域之一。我國教育部歷時(shí)10年制定了《義務(wù)教育生物學(xué)課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)(2011年版)》,加速了我國初中生物課程的發(fā)展。緊隨新課標(biāo)的實(shí)施,經(jīng)過教育部審定,人民教育出版社出版了《義務(wù)教育教科書·生物學(xué)》。美國是世界最發(fā)達(dá)的國家,十分注重基礎(chǔ)教育,因此借鑒美國的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)顯得非常必要。本文從課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的總體框架、課程理念、課程目標(biāo)、課程內(nèi)容、評價(jià)建議五個(gè)方面比較分析了中美初中生物課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn),并以人民教育出版社出版的《義務(wù)教育教科書·生物學(xué)》四本教材和由美國的帕迪利亞博十主編、培生教育出版集團(tuán)授權(quán)浙江教育出版社出版的《科學(xué)探索者》(中文版)生物分冊為研究對象,著重從習(xí)題、欄日設(shè)置、實(shí)驗(yàn)、學(xué)科綜合、同一內(nèi)容等維度進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的比較研究,并采用了文獻(xiàn)分析法、文本分析法、比較研究法、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較法、個(gè)案研究法、統(tǒng)計(jì)分析法等多種研究方法,客觀地評價(jià)兩套教材。通過分析比較中美兩套初中生物教材的特點(diǎn),研究我國初中生物教材的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),借鑒美國初中生物教材的優(yōu)點(diǎn),結(jié)合我國實(shí)際,為我國初中生物新課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的實(shí)施完善以及初中生物教材的進(jìn)一步修訂和編寫提供有益的參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:The biology curriculum in compulsory education is a subject course aimed at improving students' biological scientific literacy, and it is one of the important fields of science education. The Chinese Ministry of Education made the Biology Curriculum Standard for compulsory Education (2011 edition) for 10 years, which accelerated the development of biology curriculum in junior high school in China. Following the implementation of the new curriculum standard and approved by the Ministry of Education, the people's Education Publishing House published the Biology of compulsory Education textbooks. The United States is the most developed country in the world, paying great attention to basic education, so it is necessary to learn from the successful experience of the United States. This paper compares and analyzes the biology curriculum standards of junior middle schools in China and America from five aspects: the general framework of curriculum standards, curriculum concepts, curriculum objectives, curriculum contents and evaluation suggestions. Four textbooks on Biology of compulsory Education, published by the people's Education Publishing House, and ten editor-in-chief of Padiliabo in the United States, Pearson Education and Publishing Group authorized Zhejiang Education Publishing House to publish "the seeker of Science" (Chinese edition) as the research object, focusing on the problem sets, column day setting, experiment, subject synthesis, This paper makes a detailed comparative study on the same dimension, and evaluates the two sets of textbooks objectively by the methods of literature analysis, text analysis, comparative research, standard comparison, case study and statistical analysis. By analyzing and comparing the characteristics of the two sets of junior high school biology textbooks between China and the United States, this paper studies the advantages and disadvantages of our country's junior high school biology textbooks, draws lessons from the advantages of American junior high school biology textbooks, and combines the reality of our country It provides a useful reference for the implementation of the new curriculum standard of biology in junior high school and the further revision and compilation of biology teaching materials in junior high school.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G633.91

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王學(xué)東;;體驗(yàn)式教學(xué)模式的構(gòu)建與實(shí)施[A];中國高等院校市場學(xué)研究會(huì)2009年年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1900215