發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-07 12:12

  本文選題：沖突性話語(yǔ) + 言語(yǔ)行為理論　； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：在日常生活中，人與人之間的沖突時(shí)有發(fā)生，在言語(yǔ)交際過(guò)程中發(fā)生爭(zhēng)執(zhí)、爭(zhēng)吵，，甚至相互辱罵的情況也十分常見。沖突不利于人際關(guān)系的和諧，也不利于社會(huì)的和諧發(fā)展，所以對(duì)沖突性話語(yǔ)的研究是十分有意義的。為了幫助人們把握沖突性話語(yǔ)的特點(diǎn)，以便在生活中更好地處理話語(yǔ)沖突，本文以熱播電視劇臺(tái)詞為語(yǔ)料，運(yùn)用定量分析、定性分析、對(duì)比分析的方法，對(duì)沖突性話語(yǔ)的結(jié)構(gòu)特征、緩和策略以及不同人際關(guān)系間沖突話語(yǔ)的差異進(jìn)行分析，探討不同社交語(yǔ)用因素對(duì)沖突性話語(yǔ)的制約。 按照前人劃分的沖突性話語(yǔ)的三個(gè)話步進(jìn)行研究，即起始話步、沖突話步、結(jié)束話步，運(yùn)用定性分析的方法具體分析每一個(gè)話步展開的方式。在沖突過(guò)程中，人們也會(huì)借助各種語(yǔ)言手段來(lái)控制沖突性話語(yǔ)的發(fā)展，我們稱之為沖突性話語(yǔ)管理策略，沖突性話語(yǔ)管理策略對(duì)沖突性話語(yǔ)的發(fā)展有至關(guān)重要的作用，我們將其分為緩和策略和加劇策略，分別討論緩和沖突和加劇沖突的語(yǔ)言手段。我們從各種人際關(guān)系中，選取最常見的夫妻關(guān)系、代際關(guān)系、同事關(guān)系和朋友關(guān)系，對(duì)比分析他們?cè)跊_突性話語(yǔ)中的差異。通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)料的分類統(tǒng)計(jì)整理發(fā)現(xiàn)，不同人際關(guān)系間的沖突性話語(yǔ)在起始話步中存在差異。語(yǔ)用距離是導(dǎo)致人際關(guān)系間沖突性話語(yǔ)差異的主要原因。對(duì)各人際關(guān)系中沖突雙方的沖突性話語(yǔ)進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)權(quán)勢(shì)和性別是導(dǎo)致差異的主要原因。
[Abstract]:In daily life, conflicts between people occur from time to time. Disputes, quarrels and even verbal abuse are common in verbal communication. Conflict is not conducive to the harmony of interpersonal relations and the harmonious development of society, so the study of conflict discourse is of great significance. In order to help people grasp the characteristics of conflicting discourse and deal with the conflict better in their daily life, this paper uses the methods of quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis and comparative analysis to use the lines of popular TV series as the corpus. This paper analyzes the structural characteristics of conflict discourse, mitigation strategies and the differences of conflict discourse between different interpersonal relationships, and discusses the constraints of different social pragmatic factors on conflict discourse. According to the three steps of conflict discourse divided by predecessors, this paper studies the starting step, the conflict step and the ending step. The qualitative analysis method is used to analyze the mode of each step's development. In the process of conflict, people also control the development of conflict discourse by various linguistic means. We call it conflict discourse management strategy. Conflict discourse management strategy plays an important role in the development of conflict discourse. We divide them into mitigation strategies and aggravation strategies, and discuss the linguistic means of conflict mitigation and exacerbation respectively. We choose the most common relationships between husband and wife, intergenerational relationship, coworker relationship and friend relationship from all kinds of interpersonal relationships, and compare and analyze their differences in conflict discourse. According to the classification and statistical analysis of the corpus, it is found that the conflicting utterances in different interpersonal relationships are different in the starting steps. Pragmatic distance is the main cause of interpersonal conflict utterance difference. A comparative analysis of conflicting utterances between the conflicting parties in interpersonal relationships shows that power and gender are the main causes of the differences.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H030

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳娟;胡華平;;權(quán)勢(shì)關(guān)系在語(yǔ)言的性別現(xiàn)象中的反映[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2008年03期

2 周彥軍;何春霞;;小說(shuō)沖突話語(yǔ)分析[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

3 陳_g;;沖突話語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用分析[J];長(zhǎng)沙大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

4 趙宇;;《婚姻保衛(wèi)戰(zhàn)》中夫妻間沖突性話語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用分析[J];海外英語(yǔ);2011年10期

5 寶貢敏;汪潔;;人際沖突理論研究評(píng)述[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年11期

6 高文艷;;醫(yī)患會(huì)話中權(quán)勢(shì)關(guān)系之話語(yǔ)分析[J];南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年07期

7 趙英玲;沖突話語(yǔ)分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2004年05期

8 王丹,曾慶花;會(huì)話者的權(quán)勢(shì)與等同關(guān)系及其話語(yǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)的微觀構(gòu)建[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2005年02期

9 冉永平;劉玉芳;;非攻擊性話語(yǔ)引發(fā)的沖突回應(yīng)探析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2011年05期

10 龔雙萍;;沖突性話語(yǔ)回應(yīng)策略與權(quán)勢(shì)的語(yǔ)用分析[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2011年05期

本文編號(hào)：2104927