論中國馬克思主義文學(xué)批評的民族主體性觀
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-05 08:30
【摘要】：全球文化交往時代,中國文學(xué)和文化需要堅守自身的民族主體性。中國馬克思主義文學(xué)批評不能固守啟蒙現(xiàn)代性的主客二分、絕對內(nèi)在、純粹、先驗、超歷史的本質(zhì)主體性論,而需要標舉一種向他者與歷史開放的民族主體性論。民族文化的主體應(yīng)在民族自我和他者的激蕩和融合,進而創(chuàng)造一種新質(zhì)的過程中確立。民族性既是不同民族文化之間相互區(qū)分的結(jié)果,也是由民族中人們的文化實踐所塑造并處于不停息地轉(zhuǎn)化生成中的東西。由于民族文化的主體性是處于與他者結(jié)構(gòu)關(guān)系和具體歷史中的,因此它既不拒絕外來文化,也不會固守某種凝滯不變的傳統(tǒng)文化,反而推崇中外文化的交流融合和對傳統(tǒng)文化的超越創(chuàng)新,主張在創(chuàng)造自身的歷史中凸顯與他者的差異,在融合他者中推進自身的長足發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In the era of global cultural exchanges, Chinese literature and culture need to adhere to their own national subjectivity. Chinese Marxist literary criticism cannot adhere to the subject-object dichotomy of enlightenment modernity, which is absolutely intrinsic, pure, transcendental and super-historical, but it needs to be marked by a kind of national subjectivity theory which is open to others and history. The subject of national culture should be established in the process of the agitation and amalgamation of national self and others to create a new quality. Nationality is not only the result of the mutual distinction between different national cultures, but also something shaped by the cultural practice of the people in the ethnic group and in the process of continuous transformation. Since the subjectivity of national culture is in the relationship with other people's structure and concrete history, it neither rejects foreign culture nor adheres to some kind of unchangeable traditional culture. On the contrary, it advocates the exchange and fusion of Chinese and foreign cultures and the transcendence and innovation of traditional culture, advocates the difference between others and others in the creation of their own history, and promotes their considerable development in the integration of others.
【作者單位】： 長江師范學(xué)院文學(xué)院;
【基金】：胡俊飛主持的中國博士后基金面上資助項目“中國馬克思主義文學(xué)批評民族觀的反思與建構(gòu)”(項目編號:2016M590881) 胡俊飛主持的重慶市社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃(中特理論)重點項目“習近平同志文藝座談會講話與馬克思主義文藝理論的中國形態(tài)建設(shè)研究”(項目編號:2016ZDZT19)的階段性成果
【分類號】：I206
[Abstract]:In the era of global cultural exchanges, Chinese literature and culture need to adhere to their own national subjectivity. Chinese Marxist literary criticism cannot adhere to the subject-object dichotomy of enlightenment modernity, which is absolutely intrinsic, pure, transcendental and super-historical, but it needs to be marked by a kind of national subjectivity theory which is open to others and history. The subject of national culture should be established in the process of the agitation and amalgamation of national self and others to create a new quality. Nationality is not only the result of the mutual distinction between different national cultures, but also something shaped by the cultural practice of the people in the ethnic group and in the process of continuous transformation. Since the subjectivity of national culture is in the relationship with other people's structure and concrete history, it neither rejects foreign culture nor adheres to some kind of unchangeable traditional culture. On the contrary, it advocates the exchange and fusion of Chinese and foreign cultures and the transcendence and innovation of traditional culture, advocates the difference between others and others in the creation of their own history, and promotes their considerable development in the integration of others.
【作者單位】： 長江師范學(xué)院文學(xué)院;
【基金】：胡俊飛主持的中國博士后基金面上資助項目“中國馬克思主義文學(xué)批評民族觀的反思與建構(gòu)”(項目編號:2016M590881) 胡俊飛主持的重慶市社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃(中特理論)重點項目“習近平同志文藝座談會講話與馬克思主義文藝理論的中國形態(tài)建設(shè)研究”(項目編號:2016ZDZT19)的階段性成果
【分類號】：I206
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳q，
本文編號：2434711
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2434711.html
教材專著
