訪談錄批評文體研究
[Abstract]:The interview was originally introduced into people's vision as a kind of news style. But in recent decades, especially in the new century, has been widely used in the field of literary criticism. It has the stylistic temperament as an independent literary criticism style because of its large volume, wide scope and deep involvement. In this paper, the identity of the interview under the study. The introduction part briefly describes how the interview has entered the research field as a critical style, what degree has been studied in the field of dialogical criticism, and what kind of definition has been made in the media and literary criticism respectively; At the same time, it is briefly explained that it is the result of gradual change of style under the influence of news. The main body of the thesis is divided into three parts: the first chapter focuses on the development of interview criticism. Focusing on the prosperity of the texts of the 1980s and 1990s and the prosperity of various forms since the new century, the author tries to describe the tendency of interviews as the peak of literary criticism in recent decades. It also points out that all these are closely related to the tradition of literary theory, the impetus of the times and the inner appeal of literary criticism. The second chapter is the ontological analysis of the interview critical style. It is discussed from three aspects: stylistic type, stylistic characteristics and stylistic function. According to the different classification methods, this paper lists the results of text and hypertext, simple question and answer and discussion, information interview and theoretical study. According to the essence of literary style, the author concludes that "the combination of timeliness and effectiveness", "the simultaneous nature of criticism and acceptance", "seeking common ground while reserving differences", The conclusion of complementation and reconciliation "and" system-scattered "and" rigorous-interesting "compatible language style." On this basis, the author summarizes the stylistic functions of readers, critics and critics themselves. The third chapter elevates the field of vision to the value theory of interview critical style. In the aspect of social value, it affirms its strengthening effect on "publicity" in literature public domain. In terms of stylistic value, on the one hand, it is considered to be a "dual purpose" of news style and literary criticism, on the other hand, college criticism and media criticism "shake hands". In terms of academic value, the main concern is its unique value in oral history. The conclusion part restates the status of the interview as an independent literary criticism style, and expresses the concern about whether this kind of "independence" will be dispelled, and puts forward a rational outlook for its future development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:I06
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 方維規(guī);;歐洲“沙龍”小史[J];中國圖書評論;2016年03期
2 費(fèi)冬梅;;沙龍與知識分子系列(之一) “沙龍”概念的引入和興起[J];社會科學(xué)論壇;2015年06期
3 沈杏培;;重建中國當(dāng)代文學(xué)批評的價(jià)值維度和趣味維度[J];當(dāng)代作家評論;2015年03期
4 陳全黎;;文學(xué)口述史:訪談?wù)叩穆曇鬧J];三峽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2015年03期
5 高建平;;論學(xué)院批評的價(jià)值和存在問題[J];中國文學(xué)批評;2015年01期
6 李欣;;公共性、知識生產(chǎn)與中國知識分子的“媒介化在場”[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期
7 趙勇;;文學(xué)公共性的跨國旅行?[J];文學(xué)評論;2014年06期
8 于永順;張馳;;新世紀(jì)媒體文學(xué)批評的特點(diǎn)與發(fā)展趨向[J];沈陽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年06期
9 胡振明;;言說與論爭:文學(xué)公共領(lǐng)域的流變[J];國外文學(xué);2013年04期
10 孫藜;;從媒介與“私人性”的關(guān)系看公共領(lǐng)域之可能——當(dāng)代中國語境下對哈貝馬斯歷史分析的再認(rèn)識[J];國際新聞界;2013年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 周占武;中國新聞?lì)愲娨曊勗捁?jié)目研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2015年
2 楊迎春;媒體訪談的引發(fā)與應(yīng)答研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2012年
3 喻守國;中國文論話語重建研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2011年
4 李濤;中國口述科技思想史料學(xué)研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 韓昌宏;新時(shí)期對話體批評研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年
2 姜思哲;敘事學(xué)視野下的中國電視談話類節(jié)目研究[D];哈爾濱師范大學(xué);2010年
3 陳雪艷;論中國20世紀(jì)80年代以來的對話式文學(xué)批評文體[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年
4 朱怡淼;論電視談話類節(jié)目運(yùn)作的真實(shí)原則及其走向[D];南京師范大學(xué);2005年
5 胡艷蘭;20世紀(jì)西方對話理論初探[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2005年
6 葛中魁;論90年代文學(xué)批評中的對話批評[D];青島大學(xué);2005年
,本文編號:2389627
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2389627.html