發(fā)布時間：2020-12-14 05:16

　　在高中英語寫作教學(xué)中,教師對學(xué)生的寫作給予反饋是極為重要的環(huán)節(jié)。書面糾正性反饋作為教師反饋的主要形式,是糾正寫作錯誤的重要形式。之前的許多研究都關(guān)注于寫作中語言準(zhǔn)確性進(jìn)行研究,較少有研究分析書面糾正性反饋對高中英語寫作銜接手段的有效性。本文將試圖通過實驗和訪談的方式以教師書面糾正性反饋為例來探究教師評改對高中英語寫作銜接手段的有效性。結(jié)合先前的國內(nèi)外研究,本文以注意假設(shè)和輸入輸出假設(shè)為理論基礎(chǔ),將嘗試回答以下三個問題:第一,教師書面糾正性反饋能提高高中生英語寫作中照應(yīng)、省略、替代、連接和詞匯銜接手段的運用嗎?第二,如果能提高,直接糾正性反饋和間接糾正性反饋哪種更有效?第三,這種有效性是如何體現(xiàn)的,應(yīng)該如何增強這種有效性?針對諸上問題,本研究開展了實驗研究和訪談研究。在實驗伊始,12名中等水平的學(xué)生被分為3組:直接組、間接組和控制組。實驗中,每人寫3篇文章,分別接受不同類型的反饋。控制組只接受除了銜接反饋以外的普通反饋;直接組和間接組除了接受普通反饋之外,分別接受直接反饋和間接反饋。之后進(jìn)行后測和延遲后測,學(xué)生分別寫文章4和文章5。并對這5次作文中銜接使用的數(shù)量、頻率和改正情況進(jìn)行比較研... 

【文章來源】：山東師范大學(xué)山東省

【文章頁數(shù)】：85 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Purpose and Significance
        1.2.1 Research Purpose
        1.2.2 Research Significance
    1.3 Framework of the Study
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Written Corrective Feedback
        2.1.1 Definition
        2.1.2 Classification
    2.2 Cohesion
        2.2.1 Definition
        2.2.2 Classification
        2.2.3 Framework of Cohesion Analysis
    2.3 Theoretical Foundation
        2.3.1 The Noticing Hypothesis
        2.3.2 The Input and Output Hypothesis
    2.4 Relevant Studies about Corrective Feedback in English Teaching at Abroad andHome
        2.4.1 Studies about Corrective Feedback in English Teaching at Abroad
        2.4.2 Studies about Corrective Feedback in English Teaching at Home
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Research Participants
    3.3 Research Instruments
    3.4 Research Process
        3.4.1 Research Methods
        3.4.2 Research Procedure
        3.4.3 Data Collection and Analysis
Chapter Four Results and Discussions
    4.1 Overall Use of Cohesive Devices
        4.1.1 The Changes of Cohesive Devices
        4.1.2 The Significance of the Changes
    4.2 The Use of Each Type of Cohesive Devices
        4.2.1 Changes in the Use of Reference Devices
        4.2.2 Changes in the Use of Ellipsisand Substitution Devices
        4.2.3 Changes in the Use of Conjunction Devices
        4.2.4 Changes in the Use of Lexical Cohesion Devices
    4.3 Summary and Discussions
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Researches
Bibliography
AppendixⅠ
AppendixⅡ
AppendixⅢ
AppendixⅣ
Acknowledgements



本文編號：2915887