發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-26 23:11

  本文選題：社會(huì)科學(xué) + 自然科學(xué)��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞在學(xué)術(shù)論文中起著至關(guān)重要的作用,其主要是用來(lái)建立作者的理論體系,引述前人的成果以展示作者的立場(chǎng)及觀點(diǎn)。本研究基于自建的約100萬(wàn)詞的學(xué)術(shù)論文語(yǔ)料庫(kù),對(duì)社會(huì)學(xué)科和自然學(xué)科學(xué)術(shù)論文中出現(xiàn)的轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞特征進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析。社會(huì)科學(xué)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)和自然科學(xué)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)分別包含75篇、約50萬(wàn)詞的學(xué)術(shù)論文。所有的學(xué)術(shù)論文都是下載自Science Direct全文數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),并由以英語(yǔ)為本族語(yǔ)的學(xué)者所撰寫(xiě)。本研究以Thompson and Ye(1991)和Hyland(1999)所提出的對(duì)于轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞的定義及分類(lèi)為框架,對(duì)社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞的頻率特征、語(yǔ)法特征(時(shí)態(tài)和語(yǔ)態(tài)),以及語(yǔ)義特征(指示意義和潛在價(jià)值)進(jìn)行了分析。研究結(jié)果顯示,社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞的使用有其相同和不同特點(diǎn)。頻率研究發(fā)現(xiàn),轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞find在社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中使用頻率最高。propose,consider,believe,note,define,emphasize,agree 在社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中使用的頻率相近,沒(méi)有顯著性差異。就本研究所涉及轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞而言,社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中使用的頻率是自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文的兩倍。find,suggest,examine,observe,study,report,discuss,investigate,present,reveal在社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中出現(xiàn)的頻率高于自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文,并具有顯著性差異。conclude在自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中出現(xiàn)的頻率高于社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文,呈顯著性差異。語(yǔ)法研究發(fā)現(xiàn),社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中更多地選擇使用一般現(xiàn)在時(shí)和主動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài)。但是,社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文相對(duì)多地選用一般現(xiàn)在時(shí)和主動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài),而自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中相對(duì)多地選用一般過(guò)去時(shí)被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài),二者之間具有顯著性差異。語(yǔ)義研究發(fā)現(xiàn),從指示意義角度來(lái)看,研究動(dòng)詞是社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中使用頻率最高的轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞。從潛在價(jià)值角度來(lái)看,具有積極價(jià)值的轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞是社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)論文中最常用的動(dòng)詞類(lèi)別。本研究結(jié)果可以幫助中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者在學(xué)術(shù)論文寫(xiě)作過(guò)程中更加準(zhǔn)確地選擇轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞、準(zhǔn)確無(wú)誤地表達(dá)他們的態(tài)度、想法及目的,也可以幫助學(xué)生們提高構(gòu)建學(xué)術(shù)論文語(yǔ)篇的能力。
[Abstract]:Reporting verbs play an important role in academic papers. They are mainly used to establish the theoretical system of the author and to quote the previous achievements to show the author's position and viewpoint. Based on a self-built corpus of about 1 million words of academic papers, this study makes a comparative analysis of the features of reporting verbs in academic papers of social sciences and natural sciences. The Social Science Corpus and the Natural Science Corpus contain 75 articles, about 500000 words, respectively. All papers are downloaded from the Science Direct full-text database and written by native English speakers. Based on the definition and classification of paraphrase verbs proposed by Thompson and Ye (1991) and Hyland (1999), the frequency characteristics of reporting verbs in academic papers of social sciences and natural sciences are studied. Grammatical features (tense and voice) and semantic features (demonstrative and potential value) are analyzed. The results show that the use of paraphrase verbs in academic papers of social sciences and natural sciences has the same and different characteristics. Frequency studies show that find is the most frequently used in social sciences and natural sciences, and there is no significant difference in the frequency of the use of the verb find in social science and natural science. As far as the reporting verbs involved in this study are concerned, the frequency used in social science academic papers is twice as frequent as that in natural science academic papers. The frequency of appearing in social science academic papers is higher than that in natural science academic papers. The frequency of conclude in natural science academic papers was higher than that in social sciences papers, and there was significant difference between them. Grammatical studies have found that the general present tense and active voice are more frequently used in social science and natural science academic papers. However, the general present tense and active voice are relatively used in the academic papers of social sciences, while the passive voice of the general past tense is relatively used in the academic papers of natural science, which has a significant difference between them. From the point of view of demonstrative meaning, the research verb is the most frequently used reporting verb in the academic papers of social science and natural science. From the perspective of potential value, reporting verbs with positive value are the most commonly used verb categories in academic papers of social science and natural science. The results of the present study can help Chinese EFL learners to choose the reporting verbs more accurately and express their attitudes, ideas and purposes more accurately in the process of writing academic papers. It can also help students to improve their ability to construct academic discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H314.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許明武;白振洋;;科技英語(yǔ)新聞?wù)Z篇中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞語(yǔ)用功能研究——以《時(shí)代周刊》為例[J];西安外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

2 史文霞;;中國(guó)博士生科技論文中轉(zhuǎn)述的意向結(jié)構(gòu)[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2013年03期

3 婁寶翠;;中英大學(xué)生學(xué)術(shù)論文中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞及立場(chǎng)表達(dá)對(duì)比分析[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2013年02期

4 張軍民;;基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的英語(yǔ)學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)篇轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞研究[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期

5 曾蕾;梁紅艷;;學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)篇體裁結(jié)構(gòu)與時(shí)態(tài)組合模式的元功能研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2012年01期

6 陳建林;;基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的引述動(dòng)詞研究及其對(duì)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)的啟示[J];外語(yǔ)界;2011年06期

7 張楊靜;;總統(tǒng)競(jìng)選新聞?wù)Z篇中的轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞分析[J];海外英語(yǔ);2011年04期

8 陳崇崇;;英語(yǔ)學(xué)術(shù)論文中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞的時(shí)態(tài)形式及其意義[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)言文學(xué);2010年02期

9 孫迎暉;;中國(guó)學(xué)生英語(yǔ)碩士論文引言部分轉(zhuǎn)述語(yǔ)使用情況的語(yǔ)類(lèi)分析[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2009年01期

10 袁邦株;徐潤(rùn)英;;社會(huì)科學(xué)論文中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞的學(xué)術(shù)考察[J];求索;2008年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 郝秀斌;英語(yǔ)碩士論文文獻(xiàn)綜述部分轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞使用的語(yǔ)料庫(kù)研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2014年

2 姜飛;中國(guó)英語(yǔ)碩士論文與國(guó)際期刊文章中轉(zhuǎn)述動(dòng)詞使用情況的對(duì)比研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2071752