發(fā)布時間：2018-03-22 17:36

  本文選題：解釋水平　切入點：空間距離　出處：《華東師范大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：道德判斷是指人們依據(jù)一定的準則,對自己或他人的行為或特性進行判斷的過程。在道德判斷過程的理論依據(jù)上,相繼有Kohlberg的理性模型,Haidt的社會直覺模型,Greene的雙加工理論模型。三種理論模型在情緒和認知兩者在道德判斷的過程中作用程.度上有不同的看法。社會直覺模型、雙加工理論模型均認為道德判斷可能和抽象的道德準則有關,因此有研究者引入解釋水平理論研究對道德判斷的影響,但是目前研究結論并不一致�；�于雙加工理論,這種不一致的結論可能是被試在閱讀道德事件時引起的情緒參與了道德判斷導致的。因此本研究擬基于解釋水平理論,探討解釋水平和情緒在個體對不同違規(guī)程度的道德事件做道德判斷時的關系和作用機制。試圖對已有的不一致的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)提供更合理的解釋。本研究選擇在校大學生為被試,共分為三個實驗。實驗一通過發(fā)放紙質(zhì)問卷的方法,研究空間距離對不同違規(guī)程度的道德事件的影響。結果發(fā)現(xiàn),對于低違規(guī)程度和中違規(guī)程度的行為,遠空間距離的被試對于低違規(guī)程度和中違規(guī)程度的行為可接受程度高于近空間距離的被試對這兩種違規(guī)行為的接受程度,即遠空間距離讓被試對道德判斷的標準更嚴苛。而高違規(guī)程度的行為,不同空間距離的可接受程度差異并不顯著。這說明,不同違規(guī)程度的道德情境可能存在不同的作用機制。實驗二通過行為識別量表(Behaver Identification Form,BIF)區(qū)分高解釋水平組和低解釋水平組,并讓被試對逐字呈現(xiàn)的道德情境做道德上可接受程度、情緒愉悅度、情緒強度的評分。結果發(fā)現(xiàn),高解釋水平相對于低解釋水平的被試對違規(guī)行為的可接受程度更低,反應時也更小。而只有在高違規(guī)情境,高解釋水平相對于低解釋水平表現(xiàn)出更強的負性情緒。實驗三同樣通過BIF區(qū)分高低解釋水平組后,使用情緒圖片啟動負性情緒,然后讓被試對逐字呈現(xiàn)的道德情境做可接受程度的評分。結果發(fā)現(xiàn),啟動負性情緒的條件下,高、低解釋水平的被試對低違規(guī)程度行為的接受程度差異顯著,而高違規(guī)程度的行為差異不顯著,反應時均不顯著。結合實驗二的結果可以得出結論,高解釋水平的被試在閱讀高違規(guī)道德情境時,表現(xiàn)出更強的負面情緒,該負面情緒也影響了道德判斷。
[Abstract]:Moral judgment refers to people according to certain criteria, behavior or characteristic of their own or others' judgment process. In the process of moral judgment theory, the rational model have Kohlberg, social intuition model Haidt, model Greene dual processing theory. Process three theoretical models in moral emotion and in judgment both of the cognitive process. There are different views of the social intuitionist model, dual processing theory model that may be related to moral judgment and abstract moral principles, so researchers have introduced the interpretation of theoretical level judgment influence on morality, but the conclusions are inconsistent. The dual processing theory based on this inconsistency the conclusion may be induced in reading the emotional moral events involved in moral judgment result. So this study intends to explain the level based on the theory of interpretation and emotion The relationship and mechanism of action in the individual moral judgment of different extent of illegal moral events. Attempts to study the inconsistent of the findings provide a more reasonable explanation. This research chooses college students as subjects, is divided into three experiments. One experiment by issuing paper questionnaires, studying the effects of spatial distance on different extent of illegal moral events. The results showed that for the low degree of violation and extent of illegal behavior, far distance subjects for the low degree of violation and illegal behavior in the degree of acceptability is higher than that of near space distance subjects acceptance of these two violations, far distance to be test of moral judgment standard is more stringent. And the high degree of illegal behavior, different spatial distance the acceptability of the difference is not significant. This shows that the different degree of violation may have different moral situations The mechanism of behavior recognition. Experiment two (Behaver Identification Form, by BIF) the distinction between high level group and low level interpretation interpretation group, and let be tried to show the word moral situation to make moral acceptability, emotional pleasure, emotional strength score. The results showed that the high level of interpretation with respect to the low explanation the level of the subjects for violations of the acceptability of lower, less reaction time. But only in the high illegal situation, explain high levels relative to the low construal level showed stronger negative emotion. Experiment three through the same BIF distinction between high and low level group explained after the start of negative emotions using emotional pictures, then let the participants the present situation of moral word acceptability score. The results showed that negative emotions start under the condition of high and low construal level subjects low degree of acceptance of the illegal behavior of significant difference, and high There is no significant difference in the behavior of violation degree. The reaction time is not significant. Combined with the result of experiment two, we can conclude that the high interpretive subjects show stronger negative emotions when reading the high violation moral situation, and the negative emotion also affects the moral judgement.

【學位授予單位】：華東師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B842.6

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 鐘毅平;陳海洪;;心理距離對道德行為判斷的影響[J];心理學探新;2013年01期

2 鐘毅平;陳文龍;;心理距離對不道德行為判斷的影響[J];湖南師范大學教育科學學報;2012年02期

3 邱林;鄭雪;王雁飛;;積極情感消極情感量表(PANAS)的修訂[J];應用心理學;2008年03期

4 白露,馬慧,黃宇霞,羅躍嘉;中國情緒圖片系統(tǒng)的編制——在46名中國大學生中的試用[J];中國心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2005年11期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 楊青松;時間距離對道德違規(guī)行為判斷的影響及其作用機制[D];湖南師范大學;2013年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 王珍;解釋水平對道德判斷的影響[D];河南大學;2013年

2 闞忠鈺;心理距離對道德判斷的影響[D];西南大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1649680