發(fā)布時間：2018-02-09 01:16

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 已決事實(shí) 既判力 程序內(nèi)確定力 證明力 預(yù)決效力　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：已決事實(shí)的效力分為兩個層面,其一是法律效力表現(xiàn)為既判力與程序內(nèi)確定力。既判力及于裁決書中主文中的事實(shí),而程序內(nèi)確定力及于裁決書理由部分的事實(shí)。其二,已決事實(shí)作為一種客觀存在,具有作為證據(jù)的潛能,常常體現(xiàn)為一種書證,具有證明力屬于在事實(shí)方面的效力。既判力是通過訴訟程序,經(jīng)由裁判產(chǎn)生的對訴訟爭議的處理結(jié)果的一種確定力是一種保持訴訟爭議的處理結(jié)果的狀態(tài)不變的內(nèi)在作用力。程序內(nèi)確定力則是程序內(nèi)階段性事實(shí)判斷的拘束力,被閉鎖在程序之內(nèi)。兩者皆表現(xiàn)為訴訟法上的效果,發(fā)生根據(jù)則是訴訟法的實(shí)現(xiàn)即訴訟法被有效實(shí)施。因此,實(shí)體法上不當(dāng)?shù)呐袥Q依然獲得既判力。因?yàn)閷?shí)體法在既判力的發(fā)生根據(jù)中并無立足之地。另外,既判力的發(fā)生根據(jù)不同突破既判力的根據(jù)。再審的實(shí)質(zhì)是對已經(jīng)獲得既判力的裁判予以推翻,其發(fā)生并非因既判力沒有獲得。突破既判力的依據(jù)包括訴訟程序上的不當(dāng)以及實(shí)體法上的不當(dāng)。而已決事實(shí)的事實(shí)方面的作用與其說是效力不如說任何一種存在事物所具有的秉性---作為潛在的證據(jù)。由于已決事實(shí)既有法律效力又存在事實(shí)層面的效力,因此在實(shí)踐中其表現(xiàn)為什么性質(zhì)的效力則要具體分析。而已決事實(shí)的預(yù)決效力則與已決事實(shí)法律效力及事實(shí)效力有著重大關(guān)聯(lián)。具有既判力的事實(shí)才具有絕對的預(yù)決效力,相對預(yù)決效力則與某些已決事實(shí)具有較高證明力相聯(lián)系。由于已決事實(shí)效力在后訴中表現(xiàn)樣態(tài)的復(fù)雜性,故而由立法規(guī)定則顯得力不從心。
[Abstract]:The validity of determined facts can be divided into two levels, one is that the legal effect is the res judicata and the determination in the procedure, the res judicata extends to the facts in the main text of the award, and the determination in the procedure is the facts of the reasons for the award. As an objective existence, the determined fact has the potential as evidence, which is often reflected in a documentary evidence, and the force of proof belongs to the validity of the facts. A kind of certainty of the result of handling a lawsuit dispute produced by a judge is an internal force that keeps the state of the outcome of a lawsuit dispute unchanged. The determination force within the procedure is the binding force of the judgment of the fact within the procedure. Being locked in the procedure. Both of them are the effect of the procedural law, and the basis is the realization of the procedural law, that is, the procedural law is effectively implemented. An improper judgment in substantive law still acquires res judicata, because substantive law has no place in the basis of res judicata. The occurrence of res judicata is based on different breakthroughs in the basis of res judicata. The essence of a retrial is to overturn a judge who has obtained res judicata. It is not because res judicata has not been obtained. The basis for breaking the res judicata includes improper litigation procedures and improper substantive law. The factual role of facts is not so much effective as that of any kind of existence. The nature of things-as potential evidence. Because determined facts have both legal and factual effects, Therefore, in practice, it is necessary to analyze concretely the effect of what nature it displays. The pre-determination effect of the decided fact has a significant connection with the legal effect and the factual effect of the determined fact. Only the fact with res judicata has absolute pre-determination effect, Because of the complexity of the manifestation of the validity of the determined facts in the latter case, the legislative provisions appear to be unable to do so.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D915

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張衛(wèi)平;;既判力相對性原則:根據(jù)、例外與制度化[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年01期

2 施鵬鵬;;刑事既判力理論及其中國化[J];法學(xué)研究;2014年01期

3 田勇軍;;論行政判決中主要爭議事實(shí)的預(yù)決力[J];政治與法律;2013年10期

4 馬懷德;;保護(hù)公民、法人和其他組織的權(quán)益應(yīng)成為行政訴訟的根本目的[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2012年02期

5 向忠誠;;行政判決既判力本質(zhì)論[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

6 李哲;;刑民交叉案件中的既判力問題探析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年04期

7 江偉;常廷彬;;論已確認(rèn)事實(shí)的預(yù)決力[J];中國法學(xué);2008年03期

8 翁曉斌;;論已決事實(shí)的預(yù)決效力[J];中國法學(xué);2006年04期

9 宋振武;重返刑事訴訟目的單一論[J];煙臺師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

10 張劍秋;刑事再審程序性質(zhì)研究——兼論實(shí)體真實(shí)主義與既判力之間的矛盾[J];中國刑事法雜志;2003年03期

，

本文編號：1496729