發(fā)布時間：2018-01-28 18:07

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 著作權(quán) 保護(hù)作品完整權(quán) 歪曲、篡改 修改權(quán) 作者聲譽(yù)　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)是一項(xiàng)重要的著作人格權(quán),世界上大多數(shù)國家及《伯爾尼保護(hù)文學(xué)藝術(shù)作品公約》(以下簡稱為“《伯爾尼公約》”)都規(guī)定了該權(quán)利。相對于其他國家來說,我國《著作權(quán)法》對保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的規(guī)定比較簡單,理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界對該權(quán)利存在較多爭議,相關(guān)制度也有待完善,因此,很有必要對其進(jìn)行深入的分析。本文對相關(guān)理論,國內(nèi)外著作權(quán)法律制度及其實(shí)踐,特別是我國2012~2016年涉及保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛的司法判決書等進(jìn)行分析研究,旨在完善我國保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)法律制度,并推動我國在該領(lǐng)域的理論研究。本文分引言、正文和結(jié)論三個部分。其中,正文分為三章,內(nèi)容如下:第一章為保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)理論研究,主要分析保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的基本概念,保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的起源與發(fā)展,保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的正當(dāng)性以及保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的性質(zhì)四個方面的問題。保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的概念部分主要闡述的是我國法律中該權(quán)利的基本概念,同時也指出了我國《著作權(quán)法》對該權(quán)利規(guī)定的模糊性。保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的起源與發(fā)展這一部分,主要是有關(guān)該權(quán)利在以法國和德國為代表的作者權(quán)體系國家的產(chǎn)生,在《伯爾尼公約》中的確立以及在以美國和英國為代表的版權(quán)體系國家的被動接受的研究。保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的正當(dāng)性這一部分從黑格爾的人格理論、激勵論以及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的成本收益理論的角度對設(shè)置保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的必要性進(jìn)行思考。保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的性質(zhì)部分則從保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)在民法上屬于人格權(quán)的層面進(jìn)行探討。第二章為保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)實(shí)證分析。這一部分對保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)展開了實(shí)證研究,選取了我國2012~2016年5年間北大法寶數(shù)據(jù)庫所有與保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)侵權(quán)相關(guān)的司法案例,并對其進(jìn)行了整理、歸類、分析,從中總結(jié)了法院對保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)與修改權(quán)的關(guān)系、法人作為保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)主體、保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)侵權(quán)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及救濟(jì)方式以及保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的限制等問題的態(tài)度。從這些態(tài)度中發(fā)現(xiàn)的問題將在第三章通過分析和論述得到解決,某些觀點(diǎn)也將會作為論述的例證。第三章是對我國保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)法律制度完善的探討,主要從以下幾個方面展開:保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)與修改權(quán)的關(guān)系,法人作為保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)主體的合理性,保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓、繼承和放棄的不合理性,保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的侵權(quán)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及救濟(jì)方式以及保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)限制制度。這些角度與第二章從司法案例中總結(jié)的角度相對應(yīng)。在得出每一問題的結(jié)論后,文章在此基礎(chǔ)之上,對我國《著作權(quán)法》及《著作權(quán)法實(shí)施條例》相關(guān)內(nèi)容提出了具體的修改建議,主要包括:應(yīng)當(dāng)徹底刪除修改權(quán)的內(nèi)容、明確法人能夠作為保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的主體,明確保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)讓、放棄,明確保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)的侵權(quán)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與救濟(jì)方式,以及增加對保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)限制的相關(guān)規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The right of integrity is one of the most important works of personality right, most of the countries in the world and the Berne Convention "the protection of literary and artistic works (hereinafter referred to as" < > > the Berne Convention ") have provided the right. Compared with other countries, provisions of China's copyright law works < > right protection is complete briefly, the theory and practice of the controversial right, also needs to be improved, the relevant system so it is necessary to conduct in-depth analysis of the related theory. In this paper, the legal system of the right to work and practice at home and abroad, especially the analysis of 2012~2016 in our country to protect the right of integrity infringement judgment the book, in order to improve the legal system to protect the right of integrity in our country, and promote the theoretical research in this field in our country. This thesis consists of introduction, three chapters of main body and conclusion. The text is divided into three chapters, content As follows: the first chapter is to protect the right of integrity theory, mainly analyzes the basic concept of the right of integrity, origin and development of the right of integrity, the four aspects of the nature of legitimacy and integrity protection problem of the right of protecting the integrity of works. The concept of protecting the right of integrity of the part mainly elaborates this is a basic concept in our legal rights, but also pointed out that China's "copyright law on the rights of the fuzzy > rules. The origin and development of the right of integrity of the part is mainly about the rights in the system of right of author countries represented by France and Germany have established in the < > in the Berne Convention and in the national copyright system in the United States and Britain as the representative of the study of the passive acceptance. The legitimacy of the right of protecting the integrity of works from this part of Hagel's personality theory, incentive theory and On the necessity of setting the right of integrityprotection economics cost benefit theory. Discusses the nature of some right of protecting the integrity of works from the right of protecting the integrity of works in the civil law belongs to the right of personality. The second chapter is the empirical analysis of the level of integrity protection. This part of the right of integrityprotection itsempirical study in China were selected in the 5 years 2012~2016 Chinalawinfo database and all works integrity right infringement related judicial cases, and has carried on the reorganization, classification, analysis, summarized from the court to protect the right of integrity and the right to modify the legal person as the subject of the right of integrity, integrity protection transfer standard and relief and to protect the integrity of the work the right to determine the right of integrityprotection tort limitation attitude. From these problems in the attitude The three chapter analyzes and discusses some ideas will be resolved, as the example. The third chapter is to discuss the legal system to protect the right of integrity in our country perfect, mainly from the following aspects: the relationship between the right of integrity and the right to modify the rationality of legal person as the protection of the right of integrity of the subject, the protection of works complete the transfer of the right of inheritance is not reasonable and give up, to protect the integrity of the work right infringement standard and relief and protect the right of integrity restriction system. These second chapters from the angle and the angle of judicial cases summarized corresponding. In that each problem after the conclusion, on the basis of our country. < > and < the copyright law copyright law regulation on the implementation of related content put forward specific recommendations, including: should completely delete and modify the content of the right to legal protection, clear as the work finished The main body of the whole right is to explicitly protect the integrity of the work, not to transfer, to give up the infringement judgment standard and relief way to protect the integrity of the work, and to increase the relevant provisions on the limitation of the protection of the integrity of the work.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 馮曉青;;著作權(quán)法之激勵理論研究——以經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、社會福利理論與后現(xiàn)代主義為視角[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉鵬;英美法系作者精神權(quán)利研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

2 劉有東;著作人格權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 鐘顯庭;保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)侵權(quán)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 陳一痕;保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

3 劉歡迎;論保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

4 陳佑;著作權(quán)法上的收回權(quán)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

5 夏明;保護(hù)作品完整權(quán)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

6 喬劍;論經(jīng)典文學(xué)作品完整權(quán)的保護(hù)[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號：1471181