發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-26 15:33

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信 被征信人權(quán)益保護(hù) 隱私權(quán) 信用權(quán) 信息權(quán)　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國征信業(yè)在2015年以前屬于由中國人民銀行主導(dǎo)的具有公共性質(zhì)的傳統(tǒng)征信。2015年1月,中國人民銀行印發(fā)《關(guān)于做好個(gè)人征信業(yè)務(wù)準(zhǔn)備工作的通知》,公布了首批獲得個(gè)人征信牌照的機(jī)構(gòu)名單,要求芝麻信用、騰訊征信、拉卡拉信用等八家公司做好個(gè)人征信業(yè)務(wù)的準(zhǔn)備工作。自此,市場資本開始進(jìn)入我國征信業(yè),設(shè)立征信機(jī)構(gòu),開展征信業(yè)。由于這八家征信機(jī)構(gòu)在機(jī)構(gòu)性質(zhì)、業(yè)務(wù)開展模式等多方面均與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)關(guān)系密切,因此我國新型的征信模式——互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信——由此逐漸形成,而2015年也被稱為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信“元年”�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)征信對(duì)促進(jìn)我國征信發(fā)展、信用體系建設(shè)等都起到積極的作用,但傳統(tǒng)征信立法并未充分考慮互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信這一新型征信模式,所以很多規(guī)定都不適用;加之互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信有著異于傳統(tǒng)征信的特點(diǎn),導(dǎo)致被征信人的相關(guān)權(quán)利保護(hù)容易受到威脅。本文針對(duì)被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)存在的問題,借鑒域外征信立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出重構(gòu)被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)制度的建議。第一章為緒論,主要交代本文的研究背景與意義及創(chuàng)新之處,說明國內(nèi)外對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信的研究現(xiàn)狀,陳述本文的研究內(nèi)容、思路以及方法。第二章是對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信的一般法理分析,辨析征信與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信的概念,介紹我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信的發(fā)展歷史與現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)比傳統(tǒng)征信,分析其存在的優(yōu)勢。互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信屬于合同行為,并從主體、客體以及內(nèi)容三方面論述互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信中的基礎(chǔ)法律關(guān)系。第三章論述被征信人享有的權(quán)利,并著重分析了被征信人享有的隱私權(quán)、信用權(quán),個(gè)人信息權(quán)三種權(quán)利。分別對(duì)其概念、內(nèi)容、理論學(xué)說等內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行解析,并將三種權(quán)利對(duì)比分析,探索其不同之處。第四章分別從現(xiàn)行立法、侵權(quán)表現(xiàn)及存在的問題三方面分析被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀。厘清權(quán)利保護(hù)的立法體系以及相應(yīng)的保護(hù)制度。從征信的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)分析互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信業(yè)中存在的侵害被征信人權(quán)益的行為。揭示被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)存在權(quán)利設(shè)置不合理、信用信息采集范圍法律界定不明,同意權(quán)和知情權(quán)難以保障等問題。第五章考察域外互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信中被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)制度,并取其精華;針對(duì)我國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信中被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)存在的問題,提出重構(gòu)被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù)制度的建議:完善互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信相關(guān)法律法規(guī);規(guī)范互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信中信用信息采集范圍;切實(shí)保障被征信人同意權(quán)和知情權(quán);完善信息共享以及信用評(píng)級(jí);鼓勵(lì)發(fā)展行業(yè)自律,完善監(jiān)管機(jī)制。第六章點(diǎn)明為平衡互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信業(yè)的發(fā)展與被征信人權(quán)利保護(hù),未來無論是理論研究還是征信立法上,都應(yīng)當(dāng)針對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信的特征,以及由其引發(fā)的新的問題,明確互聯(lián)網(wǎng)信息收集的范圍、完善被征信人權(quán)利保障制度等。作為新型的征信方式,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信發(fā)展前景一片大好。
[Abstract]:Before 2015, the credit information industry of our country belongs to the traditional credit reporting with public nature, which is led by the people's Bank of China. January 2015. The people's Bank of China issued a notice on the preparation of personal credit reporting business, and published the list of the first batch of institutions that have obtained personal credit license plates, requesting Sesame credit and Tencent credit information. Since then, market capital has begun to enter the credit information industry of our country, set up credit agencies, and carry out credit information industry. Because of the nature of the eight credit agencies in the organization. Business development model and other aspects are closely related to the Internet, so a new type of credit information mode in China-Internet credit-from this gradually formed. 2015 is also known as the "first year" of Internet credit reporting, which plays a positive role in promoting the development of credit information and the construction of credit system in China. However, the traditional credit legislation does not fully consider the Internet credit reporting, so many provisions are not applicable; In addition, Internet crediting has the characteristics of different from the traditional credit reporting, resulting in the protection of the relevant rights of the creditbreakers is easy to be threatened. This paper aims at the problems in the protection of the rights of the creditbreakers, and draws lessons from the experience of extraterritorial credit legislation. The first chapter is the introduction, which mainly explains the research background, significance and innovation of this paper, and explains the current situation of the research on Internet credit at home and abroad. The second chapter is the general legal analysis of Internet credit, the concept of credit and Internet credit, and introduces the history and present situation of the development of Internet credit in China. Compared with the traditional credit, the analysis of its advantages. Internet credit reporting belongs to the contract behavior, and from the main body. The object and content of the basic legal relationship in the Internet credit inquiry. Chapter three discusses the rights enjoyed by the trustee, and focuses on the analysis of the right to privacy, credit rights. Three rights of personal information right. The concept, content, theory and other connotations are analyzed, and the three rights are compared and analyzed to explore their differences. Chapter 4th respectively from the current legislation. This paper analyzes the current situation of the protection of the rights of the creditbreakers from three aspects: the manifestation of infringement and the existing problems, and clarifies the legislative system and the corresponding protection system of the protection of the rights. The behavior of the rights and interests of the creditbreakers. It is revealed that the protection of the rights of the creditbreakers is unreasonable in the setting of the rights. The legal definition of the scope of credit information collection is unclear, the right to consent and the right to know are difficult to guarantee and so on. Chapter 5th examines the system of protection of the rights of the creditbreakers in overseas Internet credit reporting, and takes its essence; In view of the problems existing in the protection of the rights of the creditbreakers in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions for reconstructing the protection system of the rights of the creditbreakers: perfecting the laws and regulations related to Internet credit reporting; Standardizing the scope of credit information collection in Internet credit reporting; The right to consent and the right to know; Perfecting information sharing and credit rating; To encourage the development of industry self-discipline and improve the regulatory mechanism. Chapter 6th points out that the balance of the development of the Internet credit industry and the protection of the rights of the creditbreakers, whether theoretical research or credit legislation in the future. Should be aimed at the characteristics of Internet credit, as well as the new problems caused by it, clear the scope of Internet information collection, improve the system of protection of the rights of creditbreakers, etc. As a new type of credit reporting. The development prospect of Internet credit information is very good.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 艾茜;朱海平;;個(gè)人信用數(shù)據(jù)的人格權(quán)保護(hù):信息權(quán)還是信用權(quán)[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年07期

2 張雅婷;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)背景下征信體系建設(shè)中的信息主體權(quán)益保護(hù)問題研究[J];征信;2016年02期

3 尹振濤;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信元年紀(jì)[J];銀行家;2016年01期

4 盧智睿;;個(gè)人征信信息主體的維權(quán)途徑研究[J];南方金融;2015年10期

5 張忠濱;劉巖松;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信個(gè)人信息保護(hù)立法的探討[J];征信;2015年08期

6 李真;;中國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信發(fā)展與監(jiān)管問題研究[J];征信;2015年07期

7 阮曉東;;大數(shù)據(jù)征信,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融發(fā)展支點(diǎn)[J];新經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2015年07期

8 葉湘榕;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融背景下的征信體系完善研究[J];華北金融;2015年06期

9 人民銀行石家莊中心支行征信管理處課題組;劉旭;胡艷芳;;河北省征信機(jī)構(gòu)培育及管理研究[J];河北金融;2015年06期

10 王漪;;個(gè)人征信市場向民資開閘[J];投資北京;2015年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙博;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下信用權(quán)民法保護(hù)研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年

2 葉世清;征信的法理研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 賈聰聰;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征信法律問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

2 張卓婭;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融征信制度建設(shè)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 王冠;基于用戶互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行為數(shù)據(jù)的個(gè)人征信評(píng)估體系建設(shè)分析[D];北京交通大學(xué);2015年

4 邵曉嵐;我國個(gè)人征信法律制度研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2015年

5 牛文茜;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融背景下消費(fèi)者的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2015年

6 孫官軍;論我國個(gè)人信息保護(hù)制度的立法完善[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2015年

7 陳真真;個(gè)人征信和信用信息權(quán)利保護(hù)的沖突與平衡[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

8 毛芬芬;我國農(nóng)戶征信法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

9 姜靜;我國個(gè)人征信法律制度研究[D];中國石油大學(xué)（華東）;2013年

10 顧丹;論個(gè)人征信中信用權(quán)的保護(hù)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1465962