發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-20 17:36

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 協(xié)議管轄 歷史演變與現(xiàn)狀 完善　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：管轄權(quán)是人民法院依法審理民商事案件的基礎(chǔ)和前提,并且承載著訴權(quán)保障的價(jià)值。正確確定案件的管轄權(quán)在司法實(shí)踐中比較復(fù)雜且易于引發(fā)爭(zhēng)議。作為最能體現(xiàn)當(dāng)事人意思自治原則和程序主體性的協(xié)議管轄制度能否順利運(yùn)行,直接關(guān)系到整個(gè)管轄制度的運(yùn)行狀況。而隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展,新型案件的涌現(xiàn),我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的協(xié)議管轄制度的規(guī)定已表現(xiàn)出了極大的局限性,明顯無(wú)法適應(yīng)層出不窮的新問(wèn)題,如:立法例的不統(tǒng)一、管轄協(xié)議形式要件過(guò)于嚴(yán)苛、協(xié)議管轄的適用范圍過(guò)于狹窄且模糊不清、可供當(dāng)事人協(xié)議選擇的法院過(guò)少、默示協(xié)議管轄缺位等等,這都嚴(yán)重制約了協(xié)議管轄制度原有價(jià)值的發(fā)揮,對(duì)協(xié)議管轄制度做必要的修改和完善已經(jīng)迫在眉睫。 本文分為四章: 第一章為協(xié)議管轄制度的基本問(wèn)題。筆者本章細(xì)分為四個(gè)小節(jié):協(xié)議管轄的概念和分類、協(xié)議管轄的適用條件、范圍與效力、協(xié)議管轄的理論基礎(chǔ)、協(xié)議管轄的制度價(jià)值。這一章為后文的闡述奠定基礎(chǔ)。 第二章為兩大法系、國(guó)際條約協(xié)議管轄制度的歷史演變、現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。筆者在本章中以兩大法系、國(guó)際條約為視角,考察他們各自關(guān)于協(xié)議管轄制度的歷史演變、現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢(shì),最后做一小結(jié),以期為中國(guó)協(xié)議管轄制度的重構(gòu)提供有益的參考意見(jiàn)。 第三章為我國(guó)協(xié)議管轄制度的歷史沿革、現(xiàn)狀。筆者在本章中梳理了我國(guó)關(guān)于協(xié)議管轄制度的立法,并通過(guò)剖析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行協(xié)議管轄制度的立法和司法實(shí)踐的現(xiàn)狀,指出了此制度的不足及面臨的挑戰(zhàn)。 第四章為我國(guó)協(xié)議管轄制度的完善。筆者在本章中針對(duì)上一章出現(xiàn)的種種問(wèn)題一一提出完善的方法,并對(duì)完善的可行性和意義做論述。
[Abstract]:Jurisdiction is the basis and premise for the people's court to try civil and commercial cases according to law. And bear the value of the protection of the right of action. The right to determine the jurisdiction of the case in judicial practice is more complex and prone to dispute. As the best embodiment of the principle of party autonomy and procedural subjectivity of the agreement jurisdiction system can. Running smoothly. With the development of the society and the emergence of new cases, the provisions of the current agreement jurisdiction system have shown great limitations. Obviously can not adapt to the endless new problems, such as: the legislation is not uniform, the formal elements of the jurisdiction agreement is too strict, the scope of application of the agreement jurisdiction is too narrow and vague. There are too few courts available for the parties' agreement to choose, and so on, which restrict the exertion of the original value of the agreement jurisdiction system. It is urgent to make necessary modification and perfection to the agreement jurisdiction system. This paper is divided into four chapters: The first chapter is the basic problems of the agreement jurisdiction system. This chapter is divided into four subsections: the concept and classification of the agreement jurisdiction, the applicable conditions, scope and effectiveness of the agreement jurisdiction, the theoretical basis of the agreement jurisdiction. This chapter lays the foundation for the later elaboration. The second chapter is two legal systems, the international treaty agreement jurisdiction system's historical evolution, the present situation and the development trend. In this chapter, the author takes the two legal systems, the international treaty as the angle of view. This paper investigates their historical evolution, present situation and development trend of the agreement jurisdiction system, and finally makes a summary in order to provide useful reference for the reconstruction of the agreement jurisdiction system in China. The third chapter is the history and current situation of the agreement jurisdiction system in our country. In this chapter, the author combs the legislation about the agreement jurisdiction system in our country. By analyzing the present situation of legislation and judicial practice of our country's current agreement jurisdiction system, the author points out the deficiency and challenge of this system. Chapter 4th is the perfection of our country's agreement jurisdiction system. In this chapter, the author puts forward some perfect methods to solve the problems in the previous chapter, and discusses the feasibility and significance of perfection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 毛玲;民事管轄制度若干問(wèn)題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 郭天武;民事管轄諸問(wèn)題研究[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

3 廖永安;;我國(guó)民事訴訟地域管轄制度之反思[J];法商研究;2006年02期

4 李浩;管轄權(quán)下放性轉(zhuǎn)移若干問(wèn)題研究——兼論我國(guó)民訴法第39條之修改[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1998年01期

5 郭翔;;民事地域管轄:理念的轉(zhuǎn)換與制度的完善[J];河北法學(xué);2006年02期

6 呂曉莉;國(guó)際民事訴訟中的協(xié)議管轄制度——兼評(píng)我國(guó)大陸相關(guān)立法[J];河北法學(xué);2002年06期

7 呂曉莉;德國(guó)國(guó)際民事訴訟中的協(xié)議管轄制度[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 郭磊;論協(xié)議管轄在國(guó)內(nèi)民事訴訟中的適用與完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

2 陳洋;論協(xié)議管轄制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1449057