發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-13 01:37

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：管理層激勵(lì)與上市公司業(yè)績(jī)的關(guān)系研究　出處：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 貨幣薪酬激勵(lì) 股權(quán)激勵(lì) 股票期權(quán)激勵(lì) 限制性股票激勵(lì) 上市公司業(yè)績(jī)

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代公司的一個(gè)主要特征就是所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者的兩權(quán)分離,這一特征使上市公司的代理成本增加。為了降低委托代理成本,公司的所有者不斷學(xué)習(xí)和更新公司的內(nèi)部治理方法--管理層激勵(lì)機(jī)制,將管理層的自身利益與公司利益結(jié)合起來。管理層激勵(lì)能否提高上市公司業(yè)績(jī)一直是該領(lǐng)域研究的熱點(diǎn)。我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)管理層激勵(lì)理論領(lǐng)域的文獻(xiàn)研究起步較晚,管理層激勵(lì)機(jī)制現(xiàn)在還很不健全,尤其是在股權(quán)激勵(lì)機(jī)制方面。最近幾年,公司治理理念的不斷更新以及資本市場(chǎng)的蓬勃發(fā)展,為完善我國(guó)管理層激勵(lì)機(jī)制提供了良好的契機(jī)。關(guān)于管理層激勵(lì)的研究也逐漸增多,我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)管理層激勵(lì)理論有了更加深入的認(rèn)識(shí)。本文是立足于前人研究的基礎(chǔ)對(duì)管理層激勵(lì)與公司經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究,期望為完善我國(guó)管理層激勵(lì)機(jī)制理論獻(xiàn)上微薄之力。本文在對(duì)管理層激勵(lì)、上市公司業(yè)績(jī)的影響因素和二者的關(guān)系進(jìn)行文獻(xiàn)梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)文獻(xiàn)的研究成果和理論基礎(chǔ),提出了四個(gè)研究假設(shè)。文章以我國(guó)上市公司2010-2014年的數(shù)據(jù)作為研究樣本,分別從管理層貨幣薪酬激勵(lì)、股權(quán)激勵(lì)這兩個(gè)方面研究其與上市公司業(yè)績(jī)之間的關(guān)系。在選擇上市公司的公司規(guī)模、股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)以及財(cái)務(wù)杠桿為控制變量的基礎(chǔ)上,通過構(gòu)建多元回歸模型對(duì)管理層貨幣薪酬激勵(lì)與上市公司業(yè)績(jī)之間的關(guān)系進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究;運(yùn)用PSM分析法來分析管理層股權(quán)激勵(lì)與上市公司業(yè)績(jī)之間的關(guān)系。通過實(shí)證研究發(fā)現(xiàn),對(duì)管理層進(jìn)行貨幣薪酬激勵(lì)和股權(quán)激勵(lì)都能提高公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)。關(guān)于產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)的研究,國(guó)有控股公司的管理層貨幣薪酬激勵(lì)的效果好于民營(yíng);而民營(yíng)控股公司的管理層股權(quán)激勵(lì)的效果好于國(guó)有。對(duì)不同股權(quán)激勵(lì)方式進(jìn)行對(duì)比,發(fā)現(xiàn)限制性股票激勵(lì)的效果要好于股票期權(quán)激勵(lì)�？紤]股權(quán)集中度的影響,發(fā)現(xiàn)股權(quán)集中度越高,股權(quán)激勵(lì)效果越差。文章的實(shí)證結(jié)果在一定程度上可以為上市公司選擇合適的管理層激勵(lì)機(jī)制提供借鑒,使上市公司將管理層的自身利益與公司的長(zhǎng)期利益結(jié)合起來,以提高公司的經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)。
[Abstract]:One of the main characteristics of modern companies is the separation of owners and managers, which makes the agency cost of listed companies increase, in order to reduce the cost of principal-agent. The owner of the company is constantly learning and updating the internal governance method of the company-management incentive mechanism. Combining the self-interest of the management with the interests of the company. Whether the management incentive can improve the performance of listed companies has been a hot topic in this field. The management incentive mechanism is not perfect, especially in the equity incentive mechanism. In recent years, the concept of corporate governance has been updated and the capital market is booming. It provides a good opportunity for perfecting the incentive mechanism of management in our country, and the research on the incentive of management is also increasing gradually. Chinese scholars have a deeper understanding of the management incentive theory. This paper is based on the previous research on the relationship between management incentive and corporate performance. In order to improve the theory of management incentive mechanism, this paper reviews the literature on the management incentive, the factors affecting the performance of listed companies and the relationship between them. According to the research results and theoretical basis of the literature, this paper puts forward four research hypotheses. This paper takes the data of Chinese listed companies from 2010-2014 as the research sample, respectively from the management monetary compensation incentive. This paper studies the relationship between equity incentive and the performance of listed companies, on the basis of choosing the size, ownership structure and financial leverage of listed companies as control variables. An empirical study on the relationship between management monetary compensation incentive and the performance of listed companies is carried out by constructing a multiple regression model. PSM analysis method is used to analyze the relationship between management equity incentive and listed company performance. Monetary compensation incentive and equity incentive can improve the performance of the company. The research on the nature of property right shows that the effect of monetary compensation incentive of state-owned holding company is better than that of private company. The effect of management equity incentive of private holding company is better than that of state-owned. By comparing different equity incentive methods, we find that the effect of restricted stock incentive is better than stock option incentive. Consider the effect of equity concentration. It is found that the higher the degree of equity concentration, the worse the effect of equity incentive. The empirical results of this paper can provide a reference for the listed companies to choose the appropriate incentive mechanism of management to a certain extent. In order to improve the company's operating performance, the listed company combines the self-interest of the management with the long-term interest of the company.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F272.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張棟;楊興全;鄭紅媛;;高管貨幣薪酬、晉升激勵(lì)與國(guó)有上市銀行績(jī)效[J];南方金融;2016年05期

2 王生年;尤明淵;;管理層薪酬激勵(lì)能提高信息披露質(zhì)量嗎?[J];審計(jì)與經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年04期

3 韓少真;潘穎;張曉明;;公司治理水平與經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)——來自中國(guó)A股上市公司的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù)[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2015年01期

4 李春玲;張好圓;;民營(yíng)企業(yè)管理層股權(quán)激勵(lì)與公司業(yè)績(jī)的效應(yīng)研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2014年13期

5 周超;;高管薪酬、公司治理與公司業(yè)績(jī)——基于滬深兩市上市公司的研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2013年10期

6 張瑞君;李小榮;許年行;;貨幣薪酬能激勵(lì)高管承擔(dān)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)嗎[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2013年08期

7 曹建安;聶磊;李珊;;上市公司高管股權(quán)激勵(lì)與企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)的實(shí)證關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2013年01期

8 羅堯;陳珊;;股權(quán)集中度、高管激勵(lì)與企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)——基于我國(guó)金融、保險(xiǎn)行業(yè)上市公司的實(shí)證研究[J];商業(yè)文化(下半月);2012年10期

9 王燁;葉玲;盛明泉;;管理層權(quán)力、機(jī)會(huì)主義動(dòng)機(jī)與股權(quán)激勵(lì)計(jì)劃設(shè)計(jì)[J];會(huì)計(jì)研究;2012年10期

10 熊風(fēng)華;彭玨;;高管權(quán)力對(duì)高管薪酬的影響研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;2012年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 朱梅;管理層激勵(lì)與企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)相關(guān)性研究[D];山東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

2 王文斐;我國(guó)上市公司股票期權(quán)激勵(lì)制度有效性實(shí)證分析[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

3 孫濤;智力資本評(píng)價(jià)及其對(duì)組織績(jī)效的影響研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1416926