我國工傷保險勞動能力喪失等級待遇研究
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the importance of industrial injury insurance in occupational safety is especially prominent, and the treatment of industrial injury is in the core position in the category of industrial injury insurance. The rationality and scientificity of the formulation of the hierarchical treatment for the loss of working ability in industrial injury insurance in China are worth studying deeply. This paper profoundly reveals whether the establishment of the ranking treatment for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance is scientific? If it is not scientific and unreasonable, how should the scientific and reasonable compensation standard for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance be calculated? This paper probes into the causes of the mismatch between the class of industrial injury and the salary by means of presentations and interviews, and finally puts forward how to establish a scientific and reasonable class treatment for the loss of labor ability in industrial injury insurance in China. According to the standard interval of injury insurance treatment and the historical development path of China's industrial injury insurance, this paper formulates a scheme for the grading treatment of the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance, and finally draws the following conclusions: Firstly, there are unreasonable problems in the policy of China's industrial injury insurance, whether it is long-term disability treatment or one-time treatment. There is an asymmetry between the payment and the disability level, the regional compensation system is fragmented and the compensation level is uneven. The formulation of the disability treatment policy in China's industrial injury insurance is not scientific and reasonable. Secondly, it is theoretically analyzed that the nature of industrial injury is a kind of civil tort, and the liability for industrial injury compensation has experienced the employee's own responsibility and fault. The essence of industrial injury compensation under the framework of social insurance is the result of quota compensation of mutual compromise between labor and management. Comprehensive analysis theoretically deduces that the treatment of disability in industrial injury insurance is essentially equal to the wage value of lost labor capacity. Thirdly, through 128 countries. Or the analysis of the treatment interval of disability in the area of industrial injury insurance, the way of long-term payment of allowance is the mainstream of complete permanent disability treatment, and the calculation model of treatment is: treatment coefficient * treatment base * treatment period = complete permanent disability treatment; the standard of partial permanent disability treatment in foreign industrial injury insurance is mostly a certain proportion. Fourthly, according to the theoretical explanation and deduction, the experience of foreign countries and the historical path of China's industrial injury insurance compensation treatment, the calculating model of the high-middle and low-grade treatment of industrial injury insurance is DT = a * L * w * (t1-t2) + (29-2n) * W. Among them, DT is the treatment of disability, AA is the treatment coefficient of disability, L is the percentage of loss of labor ability or degree of disability l < (75-100%), n < (1,2,3,4,5,6), W is the wage of the local people, T1 is the retirement age, T2 is the disabled age. Fifth, there is an objective inevitability of one-off compensation for the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance. The treatment for the loss of labor ability in China's industrial injury insurance should be based on the willingness of the disabled to choose the mode of payment. The standard of one-time compensation should be long-term corresponding to the level of disability. The discount of the allowance is consistent.
【學位授予單位】:華東師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F842.616
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 余飛躍;;美國工傷保險制度概述[J];中國醫(yī)療保險;2016年01期
2 宋妍;錢永坤;;煤炭企業(yè)生產(chǎn)安全的薪酬激勵機制研究[J];中國公共安全(學術版);2015年04期
3 余飛躍;吳亞偉;;是否足補與同補:農(nóng)民工工傷補償收入替代率及其地區(qū)差異研究——以一至四級因工傷殘待遇一次性支付標準為例[J];華東師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2015年06期
4 姜新;加旺能;;一次性工傷醫(yī)療補助金的尷尬[J];山東人力資源和社會保障;2015年11期
5 馬媛媛;王泰山;曹煜;;待遇調(diào)整對工傷保險基金運行的影響[J];中國社會保障;2015年10期
6 劉輝;周慧文;;基于公平視角的農(nóng)民工職業(yè)傷害保障研究[J];中國勞動;2015年16期
7 孟昭環(huán);;一次性工傷醫(yī)療補助金對工傷保險基金安全運行影響探析[J];人力資源管理;2015年03期
8 張軍;;建筑業(yè)農(nóng)民工參加工傷保險情況分析[J];中國人力資源社會保障;2015年02期
9 何欣;吳蕾;;返鄉(xiāng)工傷致殘農(nóng)民工生存狀況研究[J];人口研究;2015年01期
10 鄧大松;吳菲;熊羽;;農(nóng)民工職業(yè)傷害保障缺失深層因素分析[J];求實;2014年04期
相關重要報紙文章 前2條
1 嚴其慶;;一次性工傷醫(yī)療補助金不應與傷殘等級掛鉤[N];中國勞動保障報;2015年
2 謝洪;;冷眼看“一次性工傷醫(yī)療補助金”[N];中國勞動保障報;2012年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 蔡和平;中德工傷保險法律制度比較研究[D];北京大學;2004年
相關碩士學位論文 前7條
1 金劍;中日工傷保險制度比較研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學;2013年
2 王東偉;提高煤炭行業(yè)工傷保險賠償給付水平研究[D];遼寧大學;2012年
3 吳鏑;中美工傷保險制度比較[D];華東政法大學;2012年
4 王達光;我國高風險行業(yè)工傷社會保險與雇主責任保險互補分析與研究[D];云南大學;2011年
5 張倍銘;論我國工傷補償法律制度的完善[D];西南大學;2011年
6 李迪;中美工傷保險制度比較研究[D];江蘇大學;2010年
7 黃曉波;建筑行業(yè)農(nóng)民工工傷保險研究[D];上海交通大學;2007年
,本文編號:2200541
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/2200541.html