本文選題：福利競(jìng)賽 + 福利需求　； 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文歸納了福利競(jìng)賽的內(nèi)涵,認(rèn)為福利競(jìng)賽是指在政府的推動(dòng)下社會(huì)福利體系呈現(xiàn)的盲目擴(kuò)張和無(wú)規(guī)則攀升趨勢(shì)。目前福利競(jìng)賽表現(xiàn)在以下方面：社會(huì)福利水平的快速提升,社會(huì)福利體系不斷擴(kuò)張,社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)項(xiàng)目福利化傾向明顯。福利競(jìng)賽初步顯現(xiàn)就已經(jīng)造成了一定的負(fù)面影響：福利規(guī)則體系遭到破壞、市場(chǎng)作用空間被限制、擠壓。分析福利競(jìng)賽的形成機(jī)制則發(fā)現(xiàn),福利需求攀升、政府供給福利意愿增強(qiáng)以及公共政策決策程序的失控引發(fā)了福利的競(jìng)賽趨勢(shì),這其中國(guó)家過(guò)度干預(yù)的理念和事實(shí)起著重要作用。歐洲地區(qū)“高福利”和拉美地區(qū)“福利趕超”在經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)時(shí)對(duì)各國(guó)造成了嚴(yán)重的負(fù)面影響,一些地區(qū)至今不能擺脫困境。這對(duì)中國(guó)有著重要的啟示：遏制福利競(jìng)賽應(yīng)警惕民粹主義、摒棄不當(dāng)?shù)膰?guó)家干預(yù)理念、排除國(guó)家過(guò)度干預(yù)的事實(shí)；福利的盲目攀升在長(zhǎng)期內(nèi)會(huì)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展造成不良影響；福利體系建設(shè)應(yīng)把握好制度細(xì)節(jié)和關(guān)鍵點(diǎn)。在遏制福利競(jìng)賽的具體對(duì)策方面,本文認(rèn)為應(yīng)注重對(duì)社會(huì)福利的經(jīng)濟(jì)適應(yīng)性評(píng)估、建立福利制度的規(guī)則體系,注重初次收入分配的公正性、市場(chǎng)機(jī)制的健全和程序正義的建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:This paper sums up the connotation of welfare competition and holds that welfare competition refers to the blind expansion and irregular climbing trend of social welfare system under the promotion of the government. The current welfare competition is manifested in the following aspects: the rapid improvement of the social welfare level, the continuous expansion of the social welfare system, and the obvious tendency of welfare in social insurance projects. The preliminary appearance of welfare competition has caused some negative effects: the welfare rules system has been destroyed, the market function space has been restricted and squeezed. By analyzing the forming mechanism of welfare competition, it is found that the rising demand for welfare, the increasing willingness of the government to supply welfare and the runaway process of public policy decision-making lead to the trend of welfare competition. The concept and facts of excessive state intervention play an important role. Europe's "high welfare" and Latin America's "welfare catch-up" have had a serious negative impact on countries during the economic crisis, and some regions have so far been unable to get out of trouble. This has important enlightenment to China: to curb welfare competition, we should guard against populism, abandon the improper concept of state intervention and exclude the fact of excessive state intervention, and the blind rise of welfare will have a negative impact on the development of economy and society in the long run. The construction of welfare system should grasp the system details and key points. In the specific countermeasures to curb the welfare competition, this paper holds that we should pay attention to the economic adaptability evaluation of social welfare, the establishment of the welfare system rules system, the fairness of the initial income distribution, the perfection of the market mechanism and the construction of procedural justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D632.1;F842.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁建定;郭林;;我國(guó)企業(yè)職工基本養(yǎng)老金調(diào)整機(jī)制:變遷、問(wèn)題與優(yōu)化[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2011年09期

2 胡萬(wàn)年;郭啟貴;施瑋;;康德政治自由的層次性[J];巢湖學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

3 于長(zhǎng)革;;中國(guó)式財(cái)政分權(quán)與公共服務(wù)供給的機(jī)理分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2008年11期

4 韓偉;穆懷中;;中國(guó)統(tǒng)籌養(yǎng)老金適度調(diào)整指數(shù)分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2007年04期

5 蘇京春;;中等收入階段福利趕超與經(jīng)濟(jì)趕超:概念、邏輯及前車之鑒[J];財(cái)政研究;2011年11期

6 田千山;;公共政策公共性的偏離與回歸——基于善治理論的視角[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2011年04期

7 張千帆;;行政自由裁量權(quán)的法律控制——以美國(guó)行政法為視角[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年03期

8 丁建定;20世紀(jì)80年代以來(lái)瑞典的社會(huì)保障制度改革[J];國(guó)際論壇;2003年05期

9 樊綱;張曉晶;;“福利趕超”與“增長(zhǎng)陷阱”:拉美的教訓(xùn)[J];管理世界;2008年09期

10 H.哈士曼,艾彥;認(rèn)真對(duì)待各種自由——肯定性自由概念和否定性自由概念[J];國(guó)外社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 檀柯;希臘現(xiàn)代福利制度研究[D];北京大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 季盼盼;企業(yè)社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)費(fèi)負(fù)擔(dān)能力適度水平研究[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1941644