發(fā)布時間：2018-03-30 18:20

  本文選題：中美　切入點：高校道德教育　出處：《陜西師范大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：道德教育是高等學校教育的重要內(nèi)容,是培養(yǎng)具有較高思想道德素質(zhì)、符合社會需要的合格人才的重要環(huán)節(jié),是世界各國共同關注的領域之一。由于政治制度、經(jīng)濟制度、歷史文化傳統(tǒng)等方面的差異,中美兩國道德教育的開展各具特色。因此,本文采用專題比較的方法,以中國和美國高校道德教育作為比較研究的對象,關注雙方道德教育中存在的共同問題,以期在比較中取人之長、補己之短,同時發(fā)揮我國道德教育的優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng),進而對促進我國高校道德教育有所啟示和借鑒。全文由五章組成,共分為四個部分： 第一章即緒論部分,主要對論文研究意義、國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀、研究內(nèi)容與方法以及創(chuàng)新與不足進行簡要式說明。 第二章是理論闡釋部分,主要闡釋道德教育的內(nèi)涵、原則,對道德教育與德育、思想政治教育、公民道德教育進行概念厘清,界定道德教育的范疇。 第三、四、五章是本文的重點和主體部分,通過道德教育的目標、內(nèi)容和途徑三個方面的比較研究,總結中美兩國高校在道德教育目標、道德教育內(nèi)容和道德教育途徑上的共性和差異性,并提出了可供借鑒的啟示：在道德教育目標上必須堅持正確的政治方向,重新審視并確立道德教育目標的側重點,積極探索層次分明的道德教育目標體系；在道德教育內(nèi)容上,應積極強化集體觀念教育、愛國主義教育和公民權利與義務意識教育；在道德教育途徑上,要構建主體性道德教育模式,營造積極健康的道德教育環(huán)境,突顯道德教育的實踐性和服務性。 結語是本文的第四部分,是我在比較、總結的基礎上,結合思想政治教育專業(yè)相關理論和論文寫作過程中的思考,對高校道德教育的理論體系和實踐體系的建設提出自己的觀點,以引起全社會對高校道德教育發(fā)展的關注和重視,共同促進高校道德教育的發(fā)展. 本文認為在中美高校道德教育的比較研究中,不應以單純的比較為目的,比較的目的在于啟示,比較的真正意義在于提高；同時在比較的啟示上,不應只突出我國對美國成功經(jīng)驗的借鑒,同樣應突出我國道德教育的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)和成功經(jīng)驗。也就是說,比較是相互的,借鑒是相互的,這也就是本文的最大價值所在。同時,社會在發(fā)展,時代在變化,比較分析的具體結論不是一成不變的。我們必須拓寬視野,使我國高校道德教育融入世界、走向世界,從世界各國道德教育的發(fā)展中汲取有益營養(yǎng),同時向世界各國展示我國高校道德教育的成功經(jīng)驗,促進道德教育的國際化發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Moral education is an important part of higher education, is to cultivate high moral quality, an important part of the qualified personnel for the needs of the society, is one of the common concern of all countries in the world. Because of the political system, economic system, different historical and cultural traditions and other aspects of the two countries, Sino US to carry out moral education have their own characteristics. Therefore, this paper the subject comparison, the moral education in Colleges and universities Chinese and America as the object of comparative research, pay close attention to the common problems of both sides in moral education, in order to take in the comparison, fill our own short, and exert the excellent traditional moral education of our country, and to promote the inspiration and reference of our moral education in Colleges and universities. The thesis consists of five chapters, is divided into four parts:
The first chapter, the introduction part, is a brief description of the significance of the research, the research status at home and abroad, the research content and methods, and the innovation and deficiency.
The second chapter is the theoretical interpretation part, mainly explaining the connotation and principles of moral education, clarifying the concept of moral education and moral education, ideological and political education, civic moral education, and defining the scope of moral education.
Third, fourth, the five chapter is the main body part of this article, through the moral education goal, a comparative study of the three aspects of the content and method, summary of Sino US university moral education goal, similarities and differences of the content of moral education and moral education way, and offers some enlightenment: the goal of moral education we must adhere to the correct political orientation, re-examine and establish the goal of moral education focus, and actively explore the moral education target system hierarchy; the content of moral education, we should strengthen the concept of collective education, patriotic education and the rights and duties of citizens awareness education; in the approach of moral education, to construct the model of moral education the main body, to create a positive and healthy environment of moral education, highlighting the practicality of moral education and service.
The conclusion is the fourth part of this paper, I compare, on the basis of summing up, based on the thinking of the ideological and political education theory and the process of writing the paper, put forward their views to construct the theoretical system and practice system of moral education in Colleges and universities, to attract the attention of the whole society and attach great importance to the development of the moral education in Colleges and universities, together to promote the development of moral education in Colleges and universities.
This paper argues that in the comparative study of the moral education in Colleges and universities, should not be a simple comparison for the purpose of comparison is to compare the true meaning of enlightenment, is to improve; and in the comparison enlightenment, we should not only focus on our country to draw lessons from the successful experience of the United States, the fine tradition and successful experience should be equally prominent in China moral education. That is to say, the comparison is mutual, from each other, this is the biggest value of this paper. At the same time, with the development of society, in the era of change, specific conclusions comparative analysis is not immutable and frozen. We must broaden their horizons, make our moral education into the world, to the world. We can learn more from the development of moral education in the world, and show the successful experience of moral education in Colleges and universities in China to the world, to promote the moral education and international development.

【學位授予單位】：陜西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G641

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 楊清榮;儒家義利觀解讀[J];道德與文明;2005年01期

2 莊穗;對集體主義價值觀的新思考——兼與個人主義價值觀的比較和反思[J];福建省社會主義學院學報;2002年04期

3 金瑾如;中美高校德育共同性與特殊性比較分析[J];廣西青年干部學院學報;2003年03期

4 但昭偉;;以“權利語言與最低要求道德”為核心的道德教育[J];中國德育;2006年05期

5 張佐;中西道德教育比較──兼論我國新時期德育改革[J];杭州師范學院學報;1994年01期

6 周兆龍;中美高校學生德育途徑比較初探[J];江西社會科學;2002年12期

7 心遠;在碰撞中產(chǎn)生能量──楊振寧教授答問錄[J];科技導報;1994年07期

8 劉小強;蔣喜鋒;;質(zhì)量戰(zhàn)略下的課程改革——20世紀80年代以來美國本科教育頂點課程的改革發(fā)展[J];清華大學教育研究;2010年02期

9 唐漢衛(wèi);多元文化視景中的美國道德教育[J];當代教育科學;2005年18期

10 鄧才彪;淺談道德教育他律與自律的問題[J];山東師大學報(社會科學版);1997年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 戴靜;中美學校德育的比較及對中國學校德育的啟示[D];華中師范大學;2004年

2 鄭紅鶯;美國學校德育途徑方法借鑒研究[D];西南政法大學;2005年

3 王宏偉;美國高校德育及其對我國的啟示[D];東北師范大學;2008年

4 蘭小凱;中美高校道德教育比較研究[D];延邊大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1687077