反啟蒙視野下的《俄狄浦斯王》
發(fā)布時間:2018-11-26 21:05
【摘要】:本文以古希臘悲劇《俄狄浦斯王》為載體,比較古希臘雅典古典時代的語境、18世紀(jì)語境與20世紀(jì)中葉以來反啟蒙思潮三種語境下的解讀,辨別不同性質(zhì)的“反啟蒙”話語與啟蒙主義的關(guān)系及其價值。本文共分三個章節(jié),第一章試圖將《俄狄浦斯王》置于其產(chǎn)生的話語背景下予以解讀,指出在作品中俄狄浦斯的失敗是其無法逃脫的命運使然,是古希臘雅典啟蒙時代,神的權(quán)威不可撼動的表征。第二章試圖將《俄狄浦斯王》置于當(dāng)下后現(xiàn)代思潮崛起的話語背景下予以解讀,指出俄狄浦斯在當(dāng)代失敗是由于自身的缺陷(人及其理性的不健全)所導(dǎo)致的。第三章通過比較以上兩種語境下對《俄狄浦斯王》的解讀,試圖回答以下三個問題:(1)啟蒙出現(xiàn)問題時,我們應(yīng)該怎么辦;(2)啟蒙和反啟蒙的關(guān)系是怎樣的;(3)當(dāng)下反啟蒙的價值及其應(yīng)避免的問題。
[Abstract]:Based on the tragedy of ancient Greece, King Oedipus, this paper compares the context of the ancient Greek Athens classical era, the context of the 18th century and the anti-enlightenment trend of thought since the middle of the 20th century. Distinguish the relationship and value of anti-enlightenment discourse and enlightenment doctrine. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter tries to interpret Oedipus under the background of his discourse, and points out that the failure of Oedipus in his works is his inescapable fate, and it is the Enlightenment of Athens in ancient Greece. The unshakable expression of God's authority. The second chapter tries to interpret King Oedipus in the context of the rise of postmodernism, and points out that Oedipus' failure in the contemporary era is caused by his own defects (human beings and their rational imperfections). The third chapter tries to answer the following three questions by comparing the interpretation of King Oedipus in the above two contexts: (1) what should we do when there are problems in enlightenment, (2) what is the relationship between enlightenment and anti-enlightenment; (3) the value of anti-enlightenment and the problems that should be avoided.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:I106
本文編號:2359616
[Abstract]:Based on the tragedy of ancient Greece, King Oedipus, this paper compares the context of the ancient Greek Athens classical era, the context of the 18th century and the anti-enlightenment trend of thought since the middle of the 20th century. Distinguish the relationship and value of anti-enlightenment discourse and enlightenment doctrine. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter tries to interpret Oedipus under the background of his discourse, and points out that the failure of Oedipus in his works is his inescapable fate, and it is the Enlightenment of Athens in ancient Greece. The unshakable expression of God's authority. The second chapter tries to interpret King Oedipus in the context of the rise of postmodernism, and points out that Oedipus' failure in the contemporary era is caused by his own defects (human beings and their rational imperfections). The third chapter tries to answer the following three questions by comparing the interpretation of King Oedipus in the above two contexts: (1) what should we do when there are problems in enlightenment, (2) what is the relationship between enlightenment and anti-enlightenment; (3) the value of anti-enlightenment and the problems that should be avoided.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:I106
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 陶渝蘇;差異與同一的對抗——評西方后現(xiàn)代主義對本質(zhì)主義哲學(xué)的拒斥[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2002年03期
2 鄧宏藝;;理性的悲歌——重讀《俄狄浦斯王》[J];貴州社會科學(xué);2007年03期
3 陳曉明;現(xiàn)代性之隱憂與多樣性方案[J];海南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期
4 張巖;劉欣;;古希臘命運觀念的現(xiàn)代闡釋[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2007年04期
,本文編號:2359616
本文鏈接:http://lk138.cn/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2359616.html
最近更新
教材專著