人們對(duì)言語(yǔ)禮貌的研究方興未艾,而對(duì)言語(yǔ)不禮貌的研究近年來(lái)卻剛剛興起,且至今無(wú)人從宏觀角度對(duì)言語(yǔ)不禮貌的全過(guò)程,即言語(yǔ)不禮貌在語(yǔ)篇中的觸發(fā),發(fā)展和消除進(jìn)行過(guò)理論闡釋。且之前針對(duì)言語(yǔ)不禮貌的研究多是以英文語(yǔ)料為載體,漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料的不禮貌研究鳳毛麟角。 有鑒于此,本文試圖通過(guò)分析漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料,從而對(duì)不禮貌言語(yǔ)使用的全過(guò)程進(jìn)行闡釋。具體來(lái)說(shuō),本文旨在回答以下三個(gè)問(wèn)題,即：在漢語(yǔ)語(yǔ)境的交際中,言語(yǔ)不禮貌是如何被觸發(fā)的?言語(yǔ)不禮貌觸發(fā)后,交際是如何進(jìn)行的?言語(yǔ)不禮貌是如何在交際中消除的?這三個(gè)問(wèn)題構(gòu)成了言語(yǔ)不禮貌研究的全過(guò)程。 楊平(2001)和冉永平(2004)認(rèn)為言語(yǔ)交際是話語(yǔ)與相關(guān)語(yǔ)境成分相互順應(yīng)的過(guò)程,并在綜合順應(yīng)理論和關(guān)聯(lián)理論的基礎(chǔ)上分別提出關(guān)聯(lián)-順應(yīng)模式和順應(yīng)-關(guān)聯(lián)模式以解釋言語(yǔ)交際過(guò)程。本文認(rèn)為言語(yǔ)交際的過(guò)程是話語(yǔ)形式與交際者的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境假設(shè)相互順應(yīng)的過(guò)程,認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境假設(shè)的形式是在對(duì)相關(guān)語(yǔ)境成分進(jìn)行選擇的基礎(chǔ)上建立起來(lái)的,從而提出本文所采用的交際的順應(yīng)-關(guān)聯(lián)模式。該模式主要包括以下觀點(diǎn)：第一,認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境假設(shè)的形成是動(dòng)態(tài)性過(guò)程；第二,話語(yǔ)交際是話語(yǔ)與認(rèn)知語(yǔ)境假設(shè)的動(dòng)態(tài)順應(yīng)過(guò)程；第三,交際過(guò)程受...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：90 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Figuers
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Significance of the Present Study
    1.2 Outline of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Review of Related Theories
        2.1.1 Leech's Politeness Principle
        2.1.2 Brown and Levinson's Face Theory
        2.1.3 Verschueren's Adaptation Theory
        2.1.4 Sperber and Wilson's Relevance Theory
    2.2 Review of Previous Studies
        2.2.1 Definition of Impoliteness
            2.2.1.1 The Most Appropriate Terminology
            2.2.1.2 Definition of Impoliteness
        2.2.2 Classification of Impoliteness
        2.2.3 Factors Triggering Impoliteness
            2.2.3.1 Culpeper's View
            2.2.3.2 Jay's View
        2.2.4 Impoliteness Strategies
            2.2.4.1 Frameworks of Impoliteness Strategies
            2.2.4.2 Employment of Impoliteness Strategies in Communication
        2.2.5 Responses to Impoliteness
            2.2.5.1 No Responding
            2.2.5.2 Responding:accepting or countering
    2.3 Theoretical Foundations of the Present Study
        2.3.1 Yang Ping's Relevance-adaptation Model
        2.3.2 Ran Yongping's Adaptation-relevance Model
    2.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Research Questions
    3.2 Data Collection
        3.2.1 Definition of Verbal Impoliteness Reconsidered
        3.2.2 Classification of Verbal Impoliteness Based on the Present Definition
        3.2.3 Selection of the Data
    3.3 Adaptation-relevance Model Developed in This Study
        3.3.1 Inadequacies of Yang's and Ran's Models
        3.3.2 An Adapted Adaptation-relevance Model Based on Ran's Model
        3.3.3 The Main Claims of the Present Model
            3.3.3.1 Dynamics of Cognitive Contextual Assumption
            3.3.3.2 Inter-adaptability between Utterances and Cognitive Contextual Assumption
            3.3.3.3 Guidance of Optimal Relevance Presumption in Communication
            3.3.3.4 Involvement of Strategy-choosing in Communication
    3.4 Chapter Summary
Chapter Four Analysis of Verbal Impoliteness in Thunderstorm
    4.1 Analysis of Triggering of Verbal Impoliteness under the AdaptedAdaptation-relevance Model
        4.1.1 Analysis of Triggering of Speaker-intended Hearer-perceived VerbalImpoliteness
        4.1.2 Analysis of Triggering of Speaker-unintended Hearer-perceived VerbalImpoliteness
    4.2 Analysis of Processing of Verbal Impoliteness under the AdaptedAdaptation-relevance Model
        4.2.1 Analysis of Impoliteness Strategies in Thunderstorm
            4.2.1.1 Impoliteness Strategies in Thunderstorm
            4.2.1.2 Employment of Impoliteness Strategies in Thunderstorm
        4.2.2 Responses of Impoliteness-perceiver
            4.2.2.1 The Option of Not Responding
            4.2.2.2 The Option of Responding
    4.3 Analysis of Termination of Verbal Impoliteness under the AdaptedAdaptation-relevance Model
        4.3.1 Submission to Opponent
        4.3.2 Dominant Third Party Intervention
        4.3.3 Compromise
        4.3.4 Stand-off
        4.3.5 Withdrawal
        4.3.6 Settlement with Further Hidden Conflict
    4.4 Discussion of Verbal Impoliteness in Thunderstorm
    4.5 Chapter Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Findings of the Present Study
    5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Later Studies
References
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表



本文編號(hào)：4019136