人稱代詞“他”句內(nèi)回指的歧義
[Abstract]:Anaphora phenomenon has been one of the central topics in linguistic research since 1970s. However, the research on the inner-anaphora ambiguity in third-person pronouns is still very limited. On the basis of three plane theories, this paper uses the methods of induction and deduction, format and subcategorization, contextual construction, and so on, to analyze the distribution of anaphora ambiguity, the causes of anaphora ambiguity, and the common syntactic structure types. The anaphora influencing factors and dissolving ways are analyzed systematically. The text of this paper consists of five chapters. The introduction of the first chapter introduces the research object, methods and sources of the corpus, and makes a comprehensive review of the previous related studies. In this part, while affirming the previous related research, it also points out their shortcomings, and puts forward the significance and research goal of this paper. Chapter two focuses on the distribution of anaphora structure. First of all, according to the etymology, the author summarizes the characteristics of the directed function and the common types of direction. Then, the syntactic distribution of "he" and antecedents are studied respectively, and the corresponding relationship between them in the same sentence is summarized, which provides the basis for the following induction of ambiguity types and the discussion of judgment principles. Chapter three focuses on anaphora ambiguity. Firstly, the syntactic structure types of anaphora ambiguity are summarized on the basis of chapter 2 distribution. Then, the causes of anaphora ambiguity and the factors influencing the judgment of anaphora ambiguity are analyzed from syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and cognitive aspects. While affirming the function of these surface syntactic judgment factors, it also puts forward the query according to the examples, which paves the way for the following research on the specific judgment methods. Chapter four focuses on the methods of ambiguity resolution. This part is led by syntactic analysis, introducing and affirming syntactic surface disambiguation methods, and pointing out the anaphora ambiguity which they cannot interpret, and supplemented by semantic and pragmatic. Cognitive psychology and other methods are used to analyze the omission of syntactic disambiguation. At the end of this chapter, we try to put forward the "four-step screening method" and think that the anaphora ambiguity problem should be solved by comprehensive and systematic method. The fifth chapter summarizes the innovation and deficiency of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:H146
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 宋宏;;人稱代詞語篇回指的語義解釋模型[J];當(dāng)代外語研究;2012年11期
2 王德亮;;語篇回指的認(rèn)知圖式分析[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
3 張寧;;歧義回指的表現(xiàn)形式和確定[J];中國(guó)外語;2009年06期
4 賈志峰;;漢語單數(shù)第三人稱代詞的演變及原因[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期
5 楊永忠;;第三人稱代詞反單向性照應(yīng)的生成解釋[J];天津外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
6 嚴(yán)敏芬;李健雪;;指稱晦暗性現(xiàn)象的認(rèn)知語用闡釋[J];淮陰師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期
7 張立飛;董榮月;;從認(rèn)知語法看現(xiàn)代漢語第三人稱代詞的回指功能[J];解放軍外國(guó)語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期
8 吳媛媛;;第三人稱代詞流變探微[J];北方論叢;2007年03期
9 潘冬;;英語第三人稱代詞照應(yīng)分析——兼與屈春芳同志商榷[J];外國(guó)語言文學(xué);2006年03期
10 周國(guó)光;;試論語義指向分析的原則和方法[J];語言科學(xué);2006年04期
,本文編號(hào):2205076
本文鏈接:http://lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2205076.html