【摘要】：張江教授提出的"強制闡釋論"這一斷語,既指出了當代西方文論的重要表征和長期積弊,也為國內(nèi)文學批評界、理論研究界反思中國古典、現(xiàn)當代文論和文學批評的研究方式、話語重建等提供了一個包容性極強的"問題閾"。關(guān)于當代文論的建設性出路,張江教授又進一步給出了"本體闡釋"的前瞻性主張。本文是在這一新的闡釋范式建構(gòu)思路的觸發(fā)下,從"本體闡釋"的闡釋策略、闡釋話語和闡釋者三個密切聯(lián)系的維度對之所作的進一步探索,主要述及了這一新的闡釋范式自身在具體的闡釋策略方法論層面所具有的科學價值問題,作為本體闡釋話語的民族性文學理論體系及其建設問題,以及闡釋主體應有的批評學養(yǎng)和批評態(tài)度問題。
[Abstract]:Professor Zhang Jiang's conclusion of "forced hermeneutics" not only points out the important characteristics and long-term disadvantages of contemporary western literary theory, but also reflects on Chinese classical in the field of domestic literary criticism and theoretical research. The research methods and discourse reconstruction of contemporary literary theory and literary criticism provide an inclusive "problem threshold". On the constructive way out of the contemporary literary theory, Professor Zhang Jiang further puts forward the forward-looking idea of Noumenon interpretation. Under the trigger of this new paradigm of interpretation, this paper explores it from the perspective of "Noumenon interpretation", which is closely related to discourse and interpreter, from the perspective of "Noumenon interpretation", which is closely related to the three dimensions of discourse and interpreter. This paper mainly discusses the scientific value of this new interpretation paradigm itself at the level of specific interpretation strategy methodology, as well as the national literature theory system and its construction as the Noumenon interpretation discourse. And explain the subject should be critical education and critical attitude issues.
【作者單位】： 南京大學中國新文學研究中心;
【分類號】：I0
，

本文編號：2442792