畢達(dá)哥拉斯“數(shù)本源”文藝?yán)碚撗芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-26 08:28
【摘要】：論文研究對(duì)象是畢達(dá)哥拉斯在文藝?yán)碚撝杏嘘P(guān)本體論、認(rèn)識(shí)論、方法論及哲學(xué)意識(shí)形態(tài)的相關(guān)思想。論文選題背景源自當(dāng)下的文學(xué)理論(在很大程度上也是一般的文學(xué)理論)已經(jīng)不能積極有效地介入當(dāng)下的社會(huì)文化與審美、藝術(shù)活動(dòng),不能令人滿(mǎn)意地解釋改革開(kāi)放、尤其是1990年代以來(lái)文學(xué)藝術(shù)的生產(chǎn)方式、傳播方式以及大眾的文化消費(fèi)方式的巨大變化;而對(duì)于新近出現(xiàn)的文藝活動(dòng)深刻變化的一味回避或拒斥,又反過(guò)來(lái)強(qiáng)化了文學(xué)理論中原有的本質(zhì)主義傾向。因?yàn)槲乃嚴(yán)碚摰臉?gòu)建是關(guān)乎文學(xué)本質(zhì)、審美屬性、文學(xué)功能、文學(xué)的內(nèi)容與形式以及同其它藝術(shù)形式的關(guān)系等一系列問(wèn)題的系統(tǒng)工程,故而具有研究的必要性。研究的主要方法包括,從歷時(shí)維度上對(duì)文藝?yán)碚摰谋倔w研究、思維方式、批評(píng)范式等進(jìn)行分析;對(duì)畢達(dá)哥拉斯文藝?yán)碚撨M(jìn)行建構(gòu),將之放置于一個(gè)更大的時(shí)空框架下,深刻認(rèn)識(shí)其哲學(xué)觀點(diǎn),進(jìn)而分析其美學(xué)思想。為此在論文的先期部分就先行追溯至古希臘時(shí)代,并對(duì)在文藝美學(xué)思想方面較有代表性的哲學(xué)家及其思想進(jìn)行歸納抽象。在對(duì)這些哲學(xué)家個(gè)性的文藝美學(xué)思想的梳理中探查其可能存在的共性成分,進(jìn)而與畢達(dá)哥拉斯進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,并在哲學(xué)的層面上對(duì)文學(xué)起源、文學(xué)思維、文學(xué)功能及文學(xué)形式等問(wèn)題初步探討。研究認(rèn)為,之所以提出構(gòu)建這樣一種新的文論,其目的還在于對(duì)當(dāng)下的文藝學(xué)發(fā)展做出相應(yīng)的答復(fù),因?yàn)槲膶W(xué)理論教科書(shū)在理解文學(xué)的性質(zhì)時(shí)存在嚴(yán)重的普遍主義與本質(zhì)主義的傾向,糾正這種傾向就必須重建文學(xué)理論的知識(shí)論基礎(chǔ)。我們把這個(gè)新的知識(shí)論基礎(chǔ)稱(chēng)之為建構(gòu)主義。研究結(jié)論是,在如今面臨多元文化的情景下,構(gòu)建畢達(dá)哥拉斯主義文論理應(yīng)被看做是一種歷史性的結(jié)果,事件化的必然之物。畢達(dá)哥拉斯主義文論既是限定狀態(tài)下各種因果關(guān)系綜合的產(chǎn)物,又是以自身為因果,誘發(fā)新的過(guò)程的起點(diǎn)。只有不斷的適應(yīng),不斷的創(chuàng)新,文學(xué)才具備其源遠(yuǎn)流長(zhǎng)的活力。
[Abstract]:The object of this paper is Pythagoras' thoughts on ontology, epistemology, methodology and philosophical ideology in literary theory. The background of this thesis is derived from the current literary theory (to a large extent, the general literary theory), which has been unable to actively and effectively intervene in the current social culture and aesthetic, artistic activities, and can not satisfactorily explain the reform and opening up. Especially the great changes in the mode of production, communication and mass cultural consumption of literature and art since the 1990s; The avoidance or rejection of the recent profound changes in literary and artistic activities, in turn, reinforces the original essentialism tendency in literary theory. Because the construction of literary theory is related to the nature of literature, aesthetic attributes, literary functions, the content and form of literature and the relationship with other artistic forms, so it is necessary to study. The main methods of the study include the analysis of the Noumenon study, the mode of thinking and the critical paradigm of literary and art theory from the diachronic dimension. This paper constructs Pythagoras' theory of literature and art, puts it in a larger framework of time and space, deeply understands its philosophical point of view, and then analyzes its aesthetic thought. Therefore, in the advance part of the thesis, it goes back to the ancient Greek era, and sums up the representative philosophers and their thoughts in the field of literature and art aesthetics. In the combing of these philosophers' literary and artistic aesthetic thoughts, the author probes into their possible common elements, and then makes a comparative analysis with Pythagoras, and makes a philosophical analysis of the literary origin and literary thinking. A preliminary discussion on the function and form of literature. It is believed that the purpose of constructing such a new literary theory is to make a corresponding reply to the current development of literature and art. Because there is a serious tendency of universalism and essentialism in understanding the nature of literature in the textbooks of literary theory, it is necessary to reconstruct the knowledge basis of literary theory to correct this tendency. We call this new basis of knowledge constructivism. The conclusion is that under the situation of multiculturalism, the construction of Pythagorean literary theory should be regarded as a historical result and an inevitable event. Pythagorean literary theory is not only the product of various causality synthesis under limited condition, but also the starting point of inducing new process by itself. Only by constant adaptation and innovation can literature have its long-standing vitality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉大濤;;主體間性視野下畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的美學(xué)思想[J];廣西師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期
2 王志德;;畢達(dá)哥拉斯數(shù)論的美學(xué)探微[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2012年S1期
3 馮亞;;畢達(dá)哥拉斯美學(xué)思想在希臘古典藝術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];藝術(shù)探索;2011年05期
4 劉彥順;;從“時(shí)間性”論“本質(zhì)主義”文藝學(xué)的終結(jié)[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年04期
5 王元驤;;文藝?yán)碚?工具性的還是反思性的?[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線(xiàn);2008年04期
6 楊慶祥;;“主體論”與“新時(shí)期文學(xué)”的建構(gòu)[J];當(dāng)代文壇;2007年06期
7 支宇;;“反本質(zhì)主義”文藝學(xué)是否可能?——評(píng)一種新銳的文藝學(xué)話(huà)語(yǔ)[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2006年06期
8 毛慶耆;;關(guān)于文藝學(xué)概念涵義問(wèn)題的討論[J];毛澤東文藝思想研究;2005年00期
9 王岳川;文藝方法論與本體論研究在中國(guó)[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年02期
10 王成華;西方古典哲學(xué)對(duì)實(shí)體的追究及其意義[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王月穎;音樂(lè)本體研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
2 李震;從認(rèn)識(shí)論到生存論的感性及其審美意義[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年
3 董嶺;藝術(shù)功能論[D];暨南大學(xué);2001年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條
1 宋文婕;20世紀(jì)西方現(xiàn)代文學(xué)中的神話(huà)模式探析[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2012年
2 譚馨雅;畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的自然和諧觀[D];西南大學(xué);2012年
3 王志慶;古希臘早期數(shù)學(xué)觀之研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年
4 楊ma偉;關(guān)注藝術(shù)終極視域[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2007年
5 戚霞;莊子和畢達(dá)哥拉斯美學(xué)思想比較[D];延邊大學(xué);2007年
6 王立杰;現(xiàn)象學(xué)直觀及其對(duì)文學(xué)本體論研究的啟示與意義[D];四川大學(xué);2007年
7 徐世勇;論早期畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的數(shù)本原思想[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年
8 張麗;論認(rèn)識(shí)論與體驗(yàn)論相融合的文學(xué)批評(píng)理論體系[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2002年
9 何金俐;論藝術(shù)理性精神[D];山東師范大學(xué);2001年
，
本文編號(hào)：2415305
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2415305.html
[Abstract]:The object of this paper is Pythagoras' thoughts on ontology, epistemology, methodology and philosophical ideology in literary theory. The background of this thesis is derived from the current literary theory (to a large extent, the general literary theory), which has been unable to actively and effectively intervene in the current social culture and aesthetic, artistic activities, and can not satisfactorily explain the reform and opening up. Especially the great changes in the mode of production, communication and mass cultural consumption of literature and art since the 1990s; The avoidance or rejection of the recent profound changes in literary and artistic activities, in turn, reinforces the original essentialism tendency in literary theory. Because the construction of literary theory is related to the nature of literature, aesthetic attributes, literary functions, the content and form of literature and the relationship with other artistic forms, so it is necessary to study. The main methods of the study include the analysis of the Noumenon study, the mode of thinking and the critical paradigm of literary and art theory from the diachronic dimension. This paper constructs Pythagoras' theory of literature and art, puts it in a larger framework of time and space, deeply understands its philosophical point of view, and then analyzes its aesthetic thought. Therefore, in the advance part of the thesis, it goes back to the ancient Greek era, and sums up the representative philosophers and their thoughts in the field of literature and art aesthetics. In the combing of these philosophers' literary and artistic aesthetic thoughts, the author probes into their possible common elements, and then makes a comparative analysis with Pythagoras, and makes a philosophical analysis of the literary origin and literary thinking. A preliminary discussion on the function and form of literature. It is believed that the purpose of constructing such a new literary theory is to make a corresponding reply to the current development of literature and art. Because there is a serious tendency of universalism and essentialism in understanding the nature of literature in the textbooks of literary theory, it is necessary to reconstruct the knowledge basis of literary theory to correct this tendency. We call this new basis of knowledge constructivism. The conclusion is that under the situation of multiculturalism, the construction of Pythagorean literary theory should be regarded as a historical result and an inevitable event. Pythagorean literary theory is not only the product of various causality synthesis under limited condition, but also the starting point of inducing new process by itself. Only by constant adaptation and innovation can literature have its long-standing vitality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉大濤;;主體間性視野下畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的美學(xué)思想[J];廣西師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期
2 王志德;;畢達(dá)哥拉斯數(shù)論的美學(xué)探微[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2012年S1期
3 馮亞;;畢達(dá)哥拉斯美學(xué)思想在希臘古典藝術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];藝術(shù)探索;2011年05期
4 劉彥順;;從“時(shí)間性”論“本質(zhì)主義”文藝學(xué)的終結(jié)[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年04期
5 王元驤;;文藝?yán)碚?工具性的還是反思性的?[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線(xiàn);2008年04期
6 楊慶祥;;“主體論”與“新時(shí)期文學(xué)”的建構(gòu)[J];當(dāng)代文壇;2007年06期
7 支宇;;“反本質(zhì)主義”文藝學(xué)是否可能?——評(píng)一種新銳的文藝學(xué)話(huà)語(yǔ)[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2006年06期
8 毛慶耆;;關(guān)于文藝學(xué)概念涵義問(wèn)題的討論[J];毛澤東文藝思想研究;2005年00期
9 王岳川;文藝方法論與本體論研究在中國(guó)[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年02期
10 王成華;西方古典哲學(xué)對(duì)實(shí)體的追究及其意義[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 王月穎;音樂(lè)本體研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
2 李震;從認(rèn)識(shí)論到生存論的感性及其審美意義[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年
3 董嶺;藝術(shù)功能論[D];暨南大學(xué);2001年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條
1 宋文婕;20世紀(jì)西方現(xiàn)代文學(xué)中的神話(huà)模式探析[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2012年
2 譚馨雅;畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的自然和諧觀[D];西南大學(xué);2012年
3 王志慶;古希臘早期數(shù)學(xué)觀之研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2009年
4 楊ma偉;關(guān)注藝術(shù)終極視域[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2007年
5 戚霞;莊子和畢達(dá)哥拉斯美學(xué)思想比較[D];延邊大學(xué);2007年
6 王立杰;現(xiàn)象學(xué)直觀及其對(duì)文學(xué)本體論研究的啟示與意義[D];四川大學(xué);2007年
7 徐世勇;論早期畢達(dá)哥拉斯學(xué)派的數(shù)本原思想[D];華中科技大學(xué);2004年
8 張麗;論認(rèn)識(shí)論與體驗(yàn)論相融合的文學(xué)批評(píng)理論體系[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2002年
9 何金俐;論藝術(shù)理性精神[D];山東師范大學(xué);2001年
，本文編號(hào)：2415305
本文鏈接：http://www.lk138.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2415305.html
