【摘要】： 美術(shù)作品作為一種特殊的商品進(jìn)入市場,藝術(shù)家主要通過兩種途徑獲得利益:出售作品原件給他人;授權(quán)他人在原作的基礎(chǔ)外使用該作品。其方式如授權(quán)他人對作品進(jìn)行復(fù)制、展覽、發(fā)行、改編等。也就由此產(chǎn)生了美術(shù)作品的“二次利用”問題。而本文所指的“二次利用”也就是再次發(fā)揮功能和作用的過程。美術(shù)作品的“二次利用”可以被理解為美術(shù)作品再次發(fā)揮價值的過程,并且它需要經(jīng)過細(xì)致的研究、設(shè)計和制造,才能以另外一種成品的形式展現(xiàn)在世人面前,實現(xiàn)它的使用功能這樣一種市場上出現(xiàn)的情況。美術(shù)作品在被授權(quán)進(jìn)行復(fù)制、展覽、發(fā)行、改編等的過程中必然會涉及到知識產(chǎn)權(quán)問題。最近幾年,美術(shù)作品“二次利用”的熱潮不斷掀起,由于市場還存在一定的不成熟性,因此相關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)仍需進(jìn)一步研究和深化。本文將結(jié)合現(xiàn)有的法律條文并結(jié)合實證案例對美術(shù)作品“二次利用”中的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)進(jìn)行研究。 本文的緒論部分,介紹論文研究的背景、目的,研究方法和整體規(guī)劃,引出本次研究。第一章為美術(shù)作品授權(quán)所涉及法律綜述部分,將與美術(shù)作品“二次利用”相關(guān)的著作權(quán)法進(jìn)行歸納總結(jié),介紹在實踐利用對此進(jìn)行授權(quán)的單位,當(dāng)前的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀。第二章開始進(jìn)入本文的論證部分,并在此章論述商業(yè)性藝術(shù)授權(quán)過程中的法律細(xì)分和適用,結(jié)合美國artkey藝術(shù)授權(quán)中心在中國的案例進(jìn)行實證分析。第三章研究著作權(quán)法對私權(quán)保護(hù)過程中的利益沖突問題,即公益性藝術(shù)授權(quán),以博物館對館藏文物對外授權(quán)許可進(jìn)行美術(shù)作品的衍生產(chǎn)品開發(fā)的案例進(jìn)行分析。第四章研究著作權(quán)保護(hù)年限對美術(shù)作品衍生產(chǎn)品授權(quán)的影響,以書畫開發(fā)過程和故宮博物院的藝術(shù)授權(quán)年限為案例進(jìn)行分析。最后為結(jié)論部分,總結(jié)本次研究,提出美術(shù)作品“二次利用”中授權(quán)問題的處理方案,實現(xiàn)全文論述的系統(tǒng)性和全面性。 本次研究過程中主要的創(chuàng)新之處包括以下三個方面:首先,本文首次以美術(shù)作品授權(quán)問題為題進(jìn)行研究。以往的研究雖然有涉及此方面的內(nèi)容,但大多比較分散,難以形成系統(tǒng),并且研究內(nèi)容只是針對局部的某一個問題,沒能從整體上實現(xiàn)該項研究成果。其次,本文在研究過程中所涉及的實證分析案例也是對現(xiàn)有研究的創(chuàng)新。本身這一領(lǐng)域的研究就處于初步階段,實證案例更是稀缺。本次研究所選的案例均屬于行業(yè)內(nèi)最具代表性的典型和經(jīng)典案例,對于研究論證具有不可或缺的作用。最后,本文在研究中針對美術(shù)作品“二次利用”知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)方案進(jìn)行了設(shè)計,彌補了現(xiàn)有研究的不足,并對今后的研究和實踐提供了理論指導(dǎo)。
[Abstract]:The art works enter the market as a kind of special commodity, the artist obtains the benefit mainly through two ways: selling the original works to others; authorizing others to use the works outside the original works. Such as authorizing others to copy, exhibit, distribute, adapt, etc. It also gave rise to the problem of "second use" of art works. And this paper refers to the "second use" is the process of function and function again. The "second use" of a work of art can be understood as a process of reproducing the value of a work of art, and it requires careful research, design and manufacture in order to present itself in front of the world in the form of another finished product. The realization of its use of the functionality of such a market situation. Art works in authorized reproduction, exhibition, distribution, adaptation and other processes will inevitably involve intellectual property issues. In recent years, the upsurge of "secondary utilization" of fine arts works has been set off continuously. Due to the immaturity of the market, the protection of related intellectual property rights still needs to be further studied and deepened. This paper will combine the existing legal provisions and empirical cases to study the protection of intellectual property rights in the second use of fine arts works. The introduction part of this paper introduces the background, purpose, research method and overall planning of the paper, and leads to this study. The first chapter is the review of the laws involved in the authorization of art works. The author summarizes the copyright law related to the "second use" of art works, and introduces the current situation of intellectual property protection in the units that authorize the authorization in practice. The second chapter begins to enter the argumentation part of this article, and in this chapter discusses the legal subdivision and application in the process of commercial art authorization, and carries on the empirical analysis combined with the American artkey Art Authorization Center's case in China. The third chapter studies the conflict of interest of copyright law in the process of protecting private rights, that is, the authorization of public welfare art, and analyzes the case of developing derivative products of fine arts works by means of museum to license the foreign license of cultural relics in the collection. The fourth chapter studies the influence of copyright protection years on the license of derivative products of art works, taking the developing process of calligraphy and painting and the period of art license of the Palace Museum as examples. Finally, for the conclusion part, summarize this research, put forward the plan to deal with the authorization problem in "the second use" of fine arts, and realize the systematic and comprehensive discussion of the full text. The main innovations in the process of this study include the following three aspects: first of all, this paper focuses on the issue of authorizing art works for the first time. Although there are some contents involved in this field in the past, most of them are scattered and difficult to form a system. Moreover, the research content is only aimed at a local problem and can not realize the research results as a whole. Secondly, the empirical analysis cases involved in the research process are also the innovation of the existing research. Its own research in this field is in the initial stage, empirical cases are scarce. The cases selected in this study belong to the most representative typical and classic cases in the industry, and play an indispensable role in the research and demonstration. Finally, this paper designs the protection scheme of the "second use" intellectual property rights of art works, which makes up for the deficiency of the existing research, and provides theoretical guidance for the future research and practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央美術(shù)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：J124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 徐飛;經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)平行進(jìn)口的法律規(guī)制[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2003年01期

2 王遷;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中發(fā)行權(quán)的適用[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2001年04期

，

本文編號：2455822