發(fā)布時間：2018-06-01 07:51

  本文選題：自動詞第三者被動句 + 領主屬賓句　； 參考：《湖南大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：一直以來，人們普遍認為間接被動句是日語獨有的句式。但縱觀近年來的研究，筆者發(fā)現漢語中也有類似的表現。即、“領主屬賓句”、“保留賓語被動句”分別可以和日語間接被動句中的自動詞第三者被動句和所有者被動句構成對應關系。然而，目前關于這方面的研究才剛起步，仍有許多問題有待解決。 本文在先行研究的基礎上，首先從構式語法理論出發(fā)，驗證了自動詞第三者被動句和“領主屬賓句”的可比性，同時從“非賓格理論”出發(fā)進行考察，從而得知兩種句式的對應度并非僅依賴于動詞的種類。受久野高見（2000）分析日語被害被動句成立條件的啟發(fā)，本文通過分析實際的語言用例，嘗試探討了新的對應條件�？偠�言之，兩者的對應與施動者是否為有情物及句子上下文的受害顯示程度等因素相關。 其次，關于所有者被動句和“保留賓語被動句”的可比性，本文亦通過構式語法理論進行了驗證。并根據領屬名詞和隸屬名詞的可讓渡性，對兩種句式中的所有者和所有物間的領屬關系進行重新分類，并基于這一分類對兩者的對應條件及對應度進行了考察。原則上，所有物對所有者的不可讓渡性越高，兩種構式的成立條件所受的制約越小，，兩者的對應度也就越高。但根據上下文及個人敘述視點的不同，對應度有時也會相應降低。此外，由于日語被動句一般不允準非生物名詞作主語，故當領屬關系為物品的整體—部分關系時，保留賓語被動句得以成立，而相應的所有者被動句則顯得不自然。當所有者和所有物間為整體量和部分量的關系時亦能得出同樣的結論。
[Abstract]:It has been widely accepted that indirect passive sentences are unique to Japanese. But in recent years, the author found that there is a similar performance in Chinese. That is, "the lord belongs to the object sentence" and "reserved object passive sentence" can form the corresponding relation with the third party passive sentence and the owner passive sentence in the Japanese indirect passive sentence, respectively. However, the current research on this area is just beginning, there are still many problems to be solved. On the basis of the first research, this paper first verifies the comparability between the passive sentence of the third party and the sentence of "the lord belongs to object" from the theory of construction grammar, and at the same time, from the theory of "non-objective case" to investigate. It is concluded that the corresponding degree of two sentence patterns is not dependent only on the type of verbs. Inspired by the analysis of the conditions for the establishment of Japanese passive sentences, this paper attempts to explore new corresponding conditions by analyzing practical language use cases. In a word, the correspondence between the two factors is related to whether the operator is a sentient object and the degree of victimization of sentence context. Secondly, the comparison between owner passive sentence and reserved object passive sentence is verified by the theory of construction grammar. According to the transferability of the noun and subordinate noun, this paper reclassifies the relationship between owner and owner in the two sentence patterns, and studies their corresponding conditions and corresponding degree based on this classification. In principle, the higher the irtransferability of the property to the owner, the smaller the restriction on the establishment conditions of the two constructions and the higher the corresponding degree of the two constructions. However, according to the context and personal narrative point of view, the degree of correspondence is sometimes reduced accordingly. In addition, since Japanese passive sentences generally do not allow abiotic nouns to be subject, when the relationship between the subject and the subordinate is the wholly-partial relationship of the object, the passive sentence of the retention object can be established, while the corresponding passive sentence of the owner appears unnatural. The same conclusion can be reached when the relationship between the owner and the owner is between the total quantity and the partial quantity.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H36;H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐杰;兩種保留賓語句式及相關句法理論問題[J];當代語言學;1999年01期

2 李倩;;日語間接被動句與漢語對應句式研究[J];日語學習與研究;2008年S1期

3 于康;;日漢所有關系被動句與所有物共現的語義條件[J];日語學習與研究;2009年04期

4 徐曙;何芳芝;;“太郎が/は父に死なれた”與“王冕死了父親”的構式關系——構式語法視角的分析研究[J];日語學習與研究;2010年05期

5 李杰;;試論發(fā)生句——對隱現句和領主屬賓句的句式意義的重新審視[J];世界漢語教學;2009年01期

6 韓景泉;領有名詞提升移位與格理論[J];現代外語;2000年03期

7 溫賓利,陳宗利;領有名詞移位:基于MP的分析[J];現代外語;2001年04期

8 王奇;;“領主屬賓句”的語義特點與句法結構[J];現代外語;2006年03期

9 李鉆娘;羅慎儀;;出現式與消失式動詞的存在句[J];語文研究;1987年03期

10 沈家煊;;“王冕死了父親”的生成方式——兼說漢語“糅合”造句[J];中國語文;2006年04期

本文編號：1963437