蘇世讓與鄭士龍朝天詩(shī)中的明朝形象比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-13 19:01
【摘要】：本文主要以16世紀(jì)朝鮮館閣文人的代表人物蘇世讓(1486-1562)和鄭士龍(1491-1570)創(chuàng)作的朝天詩(shī)為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用比較文學(xué)形象學(xué)的研究方法,分析二人作品中出現(xiàn)的明朝形象。并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)比兩種明朝形象的差異,發(fā)掘其差異的成因。蘇世讓的朝天詩(shī)中主要描寫了以下幾種明朝形象:處境悲慘的百姓、無(wú)禮的官員、野蠻的少數(shù)民族、繁榮的城市和惡劣的自然環(huán)境;鄭士龍的朝天詩(shī)中主要描寫了以下幾種明朝形象:強(qiáng)大的軍事設(shè)施、繁榮的城市、才華出眾的官員、魅力萬(wàn)千的女性和惡劣的自然環(huán)境。經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)比研究,筆者認(rèn)為,蘇世讓和鄭士龍的朝天詩(shī)中塑造了兩種截然不同的明朝形象:蘇世讓的朝天詩(shī)中刻畫了一個(gè)百姓生活極其困苦、下層官員腐敗無(wú)禮、社會(huì)環(huán)境動(dòng)蕩不安、自然環(huán)境艱苦惡劣的負(fù)面明朝形象,鄭士龍的朝天詩(shī)則塑造了一個(gè)軍事力量強(qiáng)大、經(jīng)濟(jì)富庶、社會(huì)開放、官員德才兼?zhèn)涞恼婷鞒蜗�。筆者認(rèn)為,之所以出現(xiàn)這樣的區(qū)別,是因?yàn)樘K世讓的朝天詩(shī)反映出詩(shī)人的特殊體驗(yàn)——基于對(duì)明朝社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的真切感受,而鄭士龍的朝天詩(shī)則回避了明朝的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí),反映了朝鮮文人關(guān)于"天朝上國(guó)"的集體想象。對(duì)特殊體驗(yàn)和社會(huì)機(jī)體想象的不同選擇則源于16世紀(jì)上半期朝鮮士大夫中士林派與勛舊派思想意識(shí)的不同。16世紀(jì)新興的士林派文人具有強(qiáng)烈的社會(huì)批判意識(shí),在個(gè)人層面上繼承了鄭夢(mèng)周的學(xué)脈,追求正義,在政治層面上崇尚倡導(dǎo)民本思想和王道政治,追求至治主義;而即將沒(méi)落的勛舊派勢(shì)力則具有很強(qiáng)的保守主義傾向,在個(gè)人層面上追求享樂(lè)主義,在政治層面上傾向于維護(hù)現(xiàn)狀,保持既得特權(quán)。筆者通過(guò)蘇世讓及鄭士龍朝天詩(shī)中的明朝形象研究,對(duì)士林派和勛舊派的思想認(rèn)識(shí)進(jìn)行對(duì)比,更加深入全面地認(rèn)識(shí)16世紀(jì)上半期朝鮮上層文人的思想面貌。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the representative characters of Korean Pavilion literati in the 16th century, Su Shijun (1486? 1562) and Zheng Shilong (1491? 1570), are taken as the object of study, and the method of comparative literature iconography is used as the research object. Analyze the image of Ming Dynasty in their works. On this basis, we compare the differences between the two images of Ming Dynasty, and explore the causes of the differences. The images of Ming Dynasty are mainly described in Su Shirong's poems: miserable people, rude officials, savage ethnic minorities, prosperous cities and bad natural environment, and the following are the images of the Ming Dynasty: miserable people, rude officials, savage ethnic minorities, prosperous cities and bad natural environment; Zheng Shilong's poems mainly describe the following images of Ming Dynasty: powerful military facilities, prosperous cities, talented officials, attractive women and harsh natural environment. Through a comparative study, the author believes that Su Shijun's and Zheng Shilong's poems create two distinct images of the Ming Dynasty: Su Shirong's poems depict a common people's life is extremely difficult, and the lower officials are corrupt and rude, and the author thinks that the poems by Su Shijun and Zheng Shilong have created two distinct images of the Ming Dynasty. The social environment is unstable and the natural environment is harsh and the negative image of Ming Dynasty. Zheng Shilong's poems on the sky have shaped a positive image of Ming Dynasty with strong military power, rich economy, open society and both moral and talented officials. The author believes that the reason for this distinction is that Su Shirong's poems on the sky reflect the poet's special experience-based on his true feelings of the social reality of the Ming Dynasty, while Zheng Shilong's poems evade the social reality of the Ming Dynasty. It reflects the collective imagination of the Korean literati on "the supremacy of China". The different choices to the special experience and the imagination of the social body originated from the difference of ideological consciousness between the scholar-bureaucrat school and the old school in the first half of the 16th century. The new scholar-scholar in the 16th century had a strong social critical consciousness, and the scholar-scholar in the 16th century had a strong sense of social criticism. On the personal level, he inherited Zheng Mengzhou's learning vein, pursued justice, advocated people-oriented thought and kingly politics at the political level, and pursued supremacy. On the other hand, the dying old school has a strong conservative tendency, pursuing hedonism on the individual level, maintaining the status quo on the political level, and maintaining the acquired privileges. Through the study of the image of Ming Dynasty in the poems of Su Shi and Zheng Shilong, the author contrasts the ideological understanding between the Scholars' School and the Old School, and more deeply and comprehensively understands the ideological features of the upper Korean literati in the first half of the 16 ~ (th) century.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I312.072
本文編號(hào)：2457842
[Abstract]:In this paper, the representative characters of Korean Pavilion literati in the 16th century, Su Shijun (1486? 1562) and Zheng Shilong (1491? 1570), are taken as the object of study, and the method of comparative literature iconography is used as the research object. Analyze the image of Ming Dynasty in their works. On this basis, we compare the differences between the two images of Ming Dynasty, and explore the causes of the differences. The images of Ming Dynasty are mainly described in Su Shirong's poems: miserable people, rude officials, savage ethnic minorities, prosperous cities and bad natural environment, and the following are the images of the Ming Dynasty: miserable people, rude officials, savage ethnic minorities, prosperous cities and bad natural environment; Zheng Shilong's poems mainly describe the following images of Ming Dynasty: powerful military facilities, prosperous cities, talented officials, attractive women and harsh natural environment. Through a comparative study, the author believes that Su Shijun's and Zheng Shilong's poems create two distinct images of the Ming Dynasty: Su Shirong's poems depict a common people's life is extremely difficult, and the lower officials are corrupt and rude, and the author thinks that the poems by Su Shijun and Zheng Shilong have created two distinct images of the Ming Dynasty. The social environment is unstable and the natural environment is harsh and the negative image of Ming Dynasty. Zheng Shilong's poems on the sky have shaped a positive image of Ming Dynasty with strong military power, rich economy, open society and both moral and talented officials. The author believes that the reason for this distinction is that Su Shirong's poems on the sky reflect the poet's special experience-based on his true feelings of the social reality of the Ming Dynasty, while Zheng Shilong's poems evade the social reality of the Ming Dynasty. It reflects the collective imagination of the Korean literati on "the supremacy of China". The different choices to the special experience and the imagination of the social body originated from the difference of ideological consciousness between the scholar-bureaucrat school and the old school in the first half of the 16th century. The new scholar-scholar in the 16th century had a strong social critical consciousness, and the scholar-scholar in the 16th century had a strong sense of social criticism. On the personal level, he inherited Zheng Mengzhou's learning vein, pursued justice, advocated people-oriented thought and kingly politics at the political level, and pursued supremacy. On the other hand, the dying old school has a strong conservative tendency, pursuing hedonism on the individual level, maintaining the status quo on the political level, and maintaining the acquired privileges. Through the study of the image of Ming Dynasty in the poems of Su Shi and Zheng Shilong, the author contrasts the ideological understanding between the Scholars' School and the Old School, and more deeply and comprehensively understands the ideological features of the upper Korean literati in the first half of the 16 ~ (th) century.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I312.072
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 魏凱琦;蘇世讓與鄭士龍朝天詩(shī)中的明朝形象比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年
，本文編號(hào)：2457842
本文鏈接：http://lk138.cn/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/2457842.html
最近更新
教材專著
