發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-29 04:43

  本文選題：文學(xué)理論教材 + 西方文論�。� 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：文學(xué)理論課程是高校中文系漢語(yǔ)言文學(xué)專業(yè)的主干課程之一,文學(xué)理論教材是這個(gè)課程的重要的學(xué)習(xí)資料。文學(xué)理論教材的編寫(xiě)中的重要組成部分是西方文論,而新時(shí)期以來(lái)的文學(xué)理論教材對(duì)西方文論的吸收、批評(píng)并不是一成不變的,二者的關(guān)系呈現(xiàn)出一種變化過(guò)程。對(duì)二者關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究,可以梳理出教材對(duì)西方文論吸收、批評(píng)的變化過(guò)程,分析出經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),落實(shí)到文學(xué)理論教材編寫(xiě)中,可以為未來(lái)教材的編寫(xiě)提供一些參考意見(jiàn)。研究文學(xué)理論教材與西方文論的關(guān)系,主要是看文學(xué)理論教材吸收了、批評(píng)了哪些理論;吸收的理論是小范圍的觀點(diǎn)式的,還是一種包容又深入的理論式、思潮式的。不過(guò),我們的論述重點(diǎn)還是放在對(duì)西方文論的吸收上。因?yàn)槲覈?guó)文學(xué)理論教材對(duì)于西方文論整體態(tài)勢(shì)上是包容與開(kāi)放的,是以吸收、借鑒為主的;同時(shí),作為教材,其本身就是提供給學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)的資料,重心還是放在對(duì)西方文論的介紹上。從教材采用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、編寫(xiě)的方式、吸收西方文論的層面等幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行分析后,可以大致歸納出新時(shí)期文學(xué)理論教材與西方文論呈現(xiàn)出的基本關(guān)系:由單一化到多維化,并不斷深入化、深度化的發(fā)展過(guò)程。新時(shí)期以來(lái)的文學(xué)理論教材的編寫(xiě),大多是有益的經(jīng)驗(yàn),但也存在一些不足,論文中分析出的經(jīng)驗(yàn)與不足,可以為未來(lái)文學(xué)理論教材編寫(xiě)者提供參考。經(jīng)驗(yàn)方面主要有:反本質(zhì)主義思潮對(duì)教材編寫(xiě)的影響越來(lái)越深刻,文學(xué)理論上的基本問(wèn)題的定義更加多元與開(kāi)放;文學(xué)理論教材中的中國(guó)文論的主體性增強(qiáng);在吸收西方文論時(shí),更加適應(yīng)了中國(guó)語(yǔ)境,中西方文論之間呈現(xiàn)出銜接與解釋、匯通與融合的趨勢(shì);文學(xué)理論教材對(duì)于學(xué)生本體的關(guān)注更加明顯,更加回歸作為教材本身的作用。不足之處主要是對(duì)理應(yīng)受到重視的作家文論的吸收呈現(xiàn)出減少的趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:Literature theory course is one of the main courses of Chinese language and literature major in Chinese department of higher learning, and literature theory teaching material is the important study material of this course. The important component of the compilation of literary theory textbook is western literary theory, but in the new period, the literary theory textbook absorbs the western literary theory, the criticism is not invariable, the relationship between the two presents a kind of change process. By studying the relationship between the two, we can sort out the changing process of absorbing and criticizing the western literary theory, analyze the experience and lessons, put it into practice in the compilation of literary theory textbook, and provide some reference suggestions for the compilation of the future textbook. The study of the relationship between literary theory textbooks and western literary theories is mainly based on what theories have been absorbed and criticized in the textbooks of literary theory, and whether the absorbing theories are of a small range of viewpoints, or a kind of inclusive and deep theoretical and ideological patterns. However, our discussion focuses on the absorption of Western literary theory. Because the textbooks of Chinese literary theory are inclusive and open to the overall situation of western literary theory, and are mainly absorbed and used for reference. At the same time, as teaching materials, they themselves are the materials for students to learn. The focus is on the introduction of western literary theory. Based on the analysis of the standards used in the textbooks, the way of compiling and absorbing the level of western literary theory, the basic relationship between the textbooks of literary theory in the new period and western literary theories can be summed up: from singularity to multi-dimension. And continue to deepen, the development of the depth of the process. The compilation of literature theory textbooks since the new period is mostly beneficial experience, but there are also some shortcomings. The experience and deficiency analyzed in the paper can provide reference for the future writers of literary theory textbooks. Experience mainly includes: the influence of anti-essentialism on the compilation of textbooks is more and more profound, the definition of basic problems in literary theory is more diversified and open, the subjectivity of Chinese literary theory is strengthened in the textbooks of literary theory; In absorbing western literary theories, they are more adapted to the Chinese context, and there is a trend of convergence and interpretation, convergence and integration between Chinese and western literary theories, and the attention of literary theory textbooks to students' Noumenon is more obvious. More return to the role of the textbook itself. The deficiency is that the absorption of the writer's literary theory should be paid more attention.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張江;;強(qiáng)制闡釋論[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;2014年06期

2 朱立元;;試論后現(xiàn)代主義文論思潮在當(dāng)代中國(guó)的積極影響[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年01期

3 朱國(guó)華;;反本質(zhì)主義文藝學(xué)教材的可能性[J];學(xué)海;2011年05期

4 胡亞敏;;后現(xiàn)代教學(xué)理念與研究型教材編寫(xiě)[J];文藝?yán)碚撗芯?2010年05期

5 曹順慶;文彬彬;;多元的文學(xué)本質(zhì)——對(duì)本質(zhì)主義和建構(gòu)主義論爭(zhēng)的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2010年01期

6 陶東風(fēng);;文學(xué)理論:建構(gòu)主義還是本質(zhì)主義?——兼答支宇、吳炫、張旭春先生[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2009年07期

7 汪正龍;;英美文學(xué)理論教材的現(xiàn)狀與走向管窺——兼談對(duì)我國(guó)文學(xué)理論教材改革的啟示[J];江漢論壇;2009年06期

8 金永兵;馬前;;文學(xué)理論“蘇聯(lián)模式”及其在新時(shí)期的價(jià)值變遷[J];文藝?yán)碚撆c批評(píng);2008年05期

9 支宇;;對(duì)以群主編《文學(xué)的基本原理》(1964年版)的社會(huì)學(xué)反思[J];文藝研究;2008年09期

10 潘熹;;范式:中國(guó)化文論的建構(gòu)——蔡儀《文學(xué)概論》的歷史意義考察[J];社科縱橫;2008年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2080900