發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-21 16:21

【摘要】：長(zhǎng)處和困難問卷(Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire,SDQ)是評(píng)估青少年兒童情緒和行為問題的常用評(píng)估工具。自1997年發(fā)表以來在世界范圍內(nèi)廣泛應(yīng)用,至今已有超過4000項(xiàng)實(shí)證研究使用了該工具。很多研究已經(jīng)表明,長(zhǎng)處和困難問卷具備良好的信效度(R.Goodman,1997;R.Goodman et al.,1998;R.Goodman,Renfrew,Mullick,2000)。然而,該問卷在國內(nèi)使用過程中,品行維度和同伴維度得分的信度在不同的研究中差異較大(品行維度的α系數(shù)范圍在0.35~0.848之間,而同伴維度的α系數(shù)則在0.001~0.602之間)。究竟是什么因素造成如此大的差異?本文擬使用信度概化技術(shù)對(duì)該問卷的信度系數(shù)這種不一致的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行定量分析,探討既往研究之間信度系數(shù)的差異,并檢驗(yàn)樣本特征和研究特征對(duì)信度系數(shù)的影響。本研究對(duì)46項(xiàng)研究中的三種信度:α系數(shù)、重測(cè)信度系數(shù)、分半信度系數(shù)分別進(jìn)行異質(zhì)性檢驗(yàn),對(duì)α系數(shù)進(jìn)行調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)分析。概化分析結(jié)果表明,隨機(jī)效應(yīng)模型估計(jì)的信度均值接近0.7或大于0.7。三種信度及各因子的異質(zhì)性顯著,品行因子表現(xiàn)較其他因子更不穩(wěn)定(Q=5486.716),同伴因子的異質(zhì)性程度相對(duì)其余因子較低(Q=1641.000),表明同伴因子的信度表現(xiàn)出“較穩(wěn)定的低”�；旌闲�應(yīng)模型的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)分析結(jié)果表明:年齡標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差、總樣本量、均分、文獻(xiàn)來源、出版物類型、樣本類型都會(huì)對(duì)總量表α有預(yù)測(cè)作用;出版年份和文獻(xiàn)來源對(duì)品行問題分量表得分的α系數(shù)有預(yù)測(cè)作用;均分和抽樣地區(qū)對(duì)同伴關(guān)系分量表得分的α有預(yù)測(cè)作用。該工具在跨樣本的使用上信度不穩(wěn)定。結(jié)論:在未來應(yīng)用長(zhǎng)處和困難問卷時(shí),應(yīng)注意這些樣本特征和研究特征對(duì)信度的影響。
[Abstract]:The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire,SDQ) is a common tool for assessing adolescent children's emotional and behavioral problems. It has been widely used in the world since its publication in 1997. So far, more than 4000 empirical studies have used the tool. Many studies have shown that the strengths and difficulties questionnaire has a good reliability and validity (R. Goodman / 1997 / R. Goodman et al.,1998;R.Goodman,Renfrew,Mullick,2000). However, in the process of using the questionnaire in China, the reliability of the scores of conduct dimension and peer dimension was significantly different in different studies (the 偽 coefficient of the conduct dimension ranged from 0.35 to 0.848, and the 偽 coefficient of the peer dimension was between 0.001 and 0.602). What makes such a big difference? This paper intends to use the reliability generalization technique to quantitatively analyze the inconsistent performance of the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire, to explore the differences of reliability coefficients among previous studies, and to examine the influence of sample characteristics and research features on reliability coefficients. In this study, three kinds of reliability of 46 studies, 偽 coefficient, retest reliability coefficient and split-half reliability coefficient, were tested for heterogeneity, and the adjustment effect of 偽 coefficient was analyzed. The results of generalizability analysis show that the estimated reliability of stochastic effect model is close to 0.7 or greater than 0.7. The heterogeneity of three kinds of reliability and each factor was significant, the character factor was more unstable than other factors (QN 5486.716), and the heterogeneity of peer factor was lower than that of other factors (QN 1641.000), which indicated that the reliability of peer factor was "stable low". The results of adjustment effect analysis of mixed effect model show that age standard deviation, total sample size, mean score, literature source, publication type and sample type can all predict the total amount of table 偽; The year of publication and the sources of literature can predict the 偽 coefficient of the score of the sub-scale of conduct problems, and the mean score and the sampling area can predict the score of the sub-scale of peer relationship. The reliability of the tool in cross-sample use is unstable. Conclusion: in the future application of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire, we should pay attention to the influence of these sample characteristics and research features on reliability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B848

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅惠文;蓋若琰;徐凌忠;張楠;莫秀婷;惠亞茹;張晶晶;;外出務(wù)工的父母對(duì)學(xué)齡前留守兒童情緒和行為問題影響的研究[J];中國初級(jí)衛(wèi)生保健;2016年02期

2 羅杰;周瑗;陳維;潘運(yùn);趙守盈;;大五人格測(cè)驗(yàn)在中國應(yīng)用的信度概化分析[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2016年01期

3 裴永光;劉可;卜秀青;王筠;葉啟蒙;林惜君;;廣州市11～14歲流動(dòng)兒童心理健康狀況的調(diào)查研究[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2016年03期

4 楊彥川;范方;蔡柔娜;彭婷;黃蓉;蔣玉露;;初三學(xué)生睡眠質(zhì)量的影響因素:一項(xiàng)追蹤研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2015年06期

5 梁文濤;潘泉西;周晨旭;李穎莉;;昆明市主城區(qū)中小學(xué)生情緒與行為問題調(diào)查[J];楚雄師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年10期

6 袁茵;歐陽旭偉;李仲強(qiáng);唐鵬;邱劍;魯娓;楊改芳;袁夢(mèng);;流浪兒童的自我意識(shí)與行為檢出情況及兩者的相關(guān)分析[J];現(xiàn)代預(yù)防醫(yī)學(xué);2015年13期

7 趙曉俠;陳晶琦;馮亞男;李景壹;;東北某城市小學(xué)生行為問題及其影響因素[J];中國學(xué)校衛(wèi)生;2015年06期

8 黎紅艷;徐建平;陳基越;范業(yè)鑫;;大五人格問卷(BFI-44)信度元分析——基于信度概化方法[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年05期

9 趙曉俠;陳晶琦;馮亞男;金怡晨;劉成鳳;于卜一;;山東省某農(nóng)村地區(qū)小學(xué)生行為問題現(xiàn)況調(diào)查及影響因素研究[J];中國兒童保健雜志;2015年05期

10 侯金芹;;讀寫困難對(duì)情緒和行為的影響——父母教養(yǎng)方式的中介作用[J];中國特殊教育;2014年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王廣海;我國學(xué)齡前兒童睡眠問題：特點(diǎn)、影響因素及行為干預(yù)[D];華東師范大學(xué);2015年

2 章晨晨;青少年內(nèi)化性問題及外化性問題危險(xiǎn)因素的追蹤研究[D];中南大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 羅天竺;農(nóng)村留守兒童與非留守兒童的心理、行為狀況比較研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

2 扈麗萍;住院青少年健康及功能障礙的調(diào)查研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

3 唐永云;青春期知信行、成長(zhǎng)發(fā)展和心理亞健康的關(guān)系探索[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

4 梁芳;遼寧省兒童青少年精神障礙評(píng)定方法及危險(xiǎn)因素分析[D];大連醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年

5 劉書君;長(zhǎng)處和困難問卷（SDQ）中文版的信度和效度研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2285676