發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-25 15:22

  本文選題：社區(qū)矯正人員 + 心理矯正��； 參考：《云南師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2016年12月30日,國(guó)家衛(wèi)生計(jì)生委、中宣部等聯(lián)合印發(fā)的《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)心理健康服務(wù)的指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn)》,該意見(jiàn)指出:需要重視特殊人群(社區(qū)服刑人員)的心理健康服務(wù),對(duì)其加強(qiáng)人文關(guān)懷和心理疏導(dǎo),消除歧視,幫助他們重新融入社會(huì),提高承受挫折、適應(yīng)環(huán)境能力,避免再犯,所以對(duì)社區(qū)矯正人員開(kāi)展心理矯正工作,顯得尤為重要。心理矯正工作是指心理學(xué)工作者運(yùn)用專(zhuān)業(yè)的心理學(xué)方法、技術(shù)和手段,對(duì)社區(qū)矯正人員開(kāi)展心理評(píng)估、心理健康教育、心理咨詢(xún)與輔導(dǎo)、心理預(yù)測(cè)與心理危機(jī)干預(yù),并在矯正結(jié)束時(shí)對(duì)干預(yù)效果進(jìn)行評(píng)估的一系列、連續(xù)的工作。心理矯正工作是一個(gè)連續(xù)的、動(dòng)態(tài)的過(guò)程,不僅包括前期對(duì)社區(qū)矯正人員進(jìn)行心理健康狀況、人身危險(xiǎn)性評(píng)估;評(píng)估后針對(duì)其犯罪類(lèi)型、矯正態(tài)度、社會(huì)支持系統(tǒng)、性格、年齡、性別等特征,開(kāi)展分類(lèi)教育、個(gè)別教育;實(shí)施心理矯正后對(duì)效果做全面評(píng)估,作為刑滿(mǎn)解矯的依據(jù)。所以,社區(qū)矯正人員心理矯正評(píng)估問(wèn)卷是一個(gè)多層次的構(gòu)念,包括10個(gè)部分:心理危機(jī)、自傷傾向、反社會(huì)傾向、再犯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、心理健康狀況、精神病性、矯正態(tài)度、矯正適應(yīng)、矯正需求和矯正效果評(píng)估。本研究共選取45名呈貢區(qū)司法局和楚雄市司法局社區(qū)矯正人員開(kāi)展個(gè)案訪(fǎng)談工作,通過(guò)質(zhì)性分析初步構(gòu)建社區(qū)矯正人員心理矯正評(píng)估問(wèn)卷,再結(jié)合筆者在呈貢司法局的工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)、專(zhuān)家豐富的咨詢(xún)案例等資料,編制形成最初的社區(qū)矯正人員心理矯正評(píng)估問(wèn)卷,最后選取云南省五華區(qū)司法局(292名)和曲靖宣威市司法局社區(qū)矯正人員(138名)開(kāi)展問(wèn)卷施測(cè)工作。數(shù)據(jù)回收后經(jīng)過(guò)項(xiàng)目分析、探索性因素分析、驗(yàn)證性因素分析、信效度的統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)檢驗(yàn),刪除不適切的題目后形成最終問(wèn)卷,最后對(duì)社區(qū)矯正人員心理健康現(xiàn)狀和心理矯正效果的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行探討。研究結(jié)果表明:1.自編的《社區(qū)矯正人員心理矯正評(píng)估問(wèn)卷》具有良好的信效度,為心理矯正工作進(jìn)行全程評(píng)估提供依據(jù)。2.總體而言,大多數(shù)社區(qū)矯正人員矯正態(tài)度積極,矯正效果明顯。3.通過(guò)獨(dú)立樣本t檢驗(yàn)和方差分析對(duì)人口學(xué)變量進(jìn)行差異檢驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn):不同年齡段的社區(qū)矯正人員在再犯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)卷上存在顯著差異,在其他問(wèn)卷上不存在顯著差異;不同婚姻狀況的社區(qū)矯正人員在各個(gè)問(wèn)卷上的得分均不存在顯著差異;判處社區(qū)矯正時(shí)間不同的人員在自傷傾向、反社會(huì)傾向、再犯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、精神病性問(wèn)卷上存在顯著差異;在再犯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)卷中,已經(jīng)參加矯正時(shí)間6個(gè)月以下的人員再犯風(fēng)險(xiǎn)明顯高于6-12個(gè)月和12個(gè)月以上的人員。
[Abstract]:On 30 December 2016, the National Health and Family Planning Commission, the Central propaganda Department and others jointly issued the guidance on strengthening Mental Health Services, which pointed out that attention should be paid to mental health services for special groups of people (community inmates). To strengthen their humanistic care and psychological guidance, eliminate discrimination, help them re-integrate into society, improve their ability to withstand setbacks, adapt to the environment and avoid repeated offenses, so it is particularly important for community correction personnel to carry out psychological correction work. Psychological correction refers to psychological workers using professional psychological methods, techniques and means to carry out psychological assessment, mental health education, psychological counseling and counseling, psychological prediction and psychological crisis intervention to community correction personnel. And at the end of the correction to evaluate the effectiveness of a series of interventions, continuous work. Psychological correction is a continuous and dynamic process, which includes not only the psychological health status and personal risk assessment of community correction personnel in the early stage, but also the type of crime, attitude correction, social support system and personality. Age, sex and other characteristics, carry out classified education, individual education; after the implementation of psychological correction to make a comprehensive evaluation of the effect, as the basis for correction of the sentence. Therefore, the community correction assessment questionnaire is a multi-level structure, including 10 parts: psychological crisis, self-injury tendency, anti-social tendency, reoffending risk, mental health condition, psychosis, correcting attitude, correcting adaptation. Corrective needs and corrective effect assessment. In this study, 45 community correction staff of Chenggong District Judicial Bureau and Chuxiong City Judicial Bureau were selected to conduct case interviews, and a preliminary psychological correction assessment questionnaire for community correctors was constructed by qualitative analysis. Combined with the author's working experience in Chenggong Judicial Bureau and the rich consulting cases of experts, the author compiled the initial psychological correction assessment questionnaire for community correction personnel. In the end, 292 members of Wuhua District Judicial Bureau of Yunnan Province and 138 Community Corrections staff of Xuanwei City Judicial Bureau of Qujing were selected to carry out the questionnaire. After data recovery, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, statistical test of reliability and validity, elimination of inappropriate topics and final questionnaire were formed. Finally, the present situation of mental health and the effect of community correction are discussed. The results of the study show that 1: 1. The questionnaire of Community Correction staff's Psychological Correction Evaluation has good reliability and validity, which provides the basis for the whole process evaluation of the mental correction work. Overall, the majority of community correction personnel positive attitude, correction effect is obvious. 3. Through the independent sample t-test and variance analysis of demographic variables difference test found: community corrector in different age groups in the risk of recidivism questionnaire there is significant difference, there is no significant difference in other questionnaires; There was no significant difference in the scores of community correctors with different marital status on each questionnaire, and there were significant differences in the self-injury tendency, antisocial tendency, risk of recidivism and psychotic questionnaire among those who were sentenced to community correction for different time. In the recidivism risk questionnaire, those who had participated in correction for less than 6 months had significantly higher risk of recidivism than those who had participated in correction for 6-12 months and more than 12 months.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B841.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 李剛;;春天的寄語(yǔ) 給社區(qū)矯正人員[J];人民調(diào)解;2013年04期

2 王應(yīng)舉;;最佳搭檔[J];人民調(diào)解;2013年06期

3 阿諍;;消弭不和諧因素是走向和諧的必由之路[J];社區(qū);2006年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 彭璇;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)視野下社區(qū)矯正人員減刑制度探析[A];建設(shè)公平正義社會(huì)與刑事法律適用問(wèn)題研究-全國(guó)法院第24屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募�（下�?cè)）[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 張仲東　赫天中;服刑人員向社區(qū)矯正人員現(xiàn)身說(shuō)法[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

2 記者 王維維;矯正人員月勞動(dòng)至少8小時(shí)[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

3 記者 盧金增 通訊員 張偉偉 梁昭;對(duì)363名矯正人員了如指掌[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

4 記者 龔哲明 通訊員 蔣偉學(xué);我市建立新型社區(qū)矯正人員綜合服務(wù)基地[N];寧波日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

5 記者 袁京;矯正人員“再犯率”年均0.16%以下[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

6 記者 郭超美 特約記者 尹海義 通訊員 王云秋;驅(qū)散社區(qū)矯正人員心靈的陰霾[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

7 通訊員 皇甫冰;為觀(guān)護(hù)矯正人員鋪設(shè)回歸之路[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

8 記者 鄧鐵軍 通訊員 廖維玉;廣西全州：幫助社區(qū)矯正人員就業(yè)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

9 本報(bào)記者 郭超美 特約記者 尹海義;王云秋：驅(qū)散矯正人員的心霾[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

10 通訊員 徐嫻;互助式平臺(tái)讓矯正人員重新融入社會(huì)[N];杭州日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳紅燕;社區(qū)矯正人員心理矯正評(píng)估問(wèn)卷的編制[D];云南師范大學(xué);2017年

2 李勇;論社區(qū)矯正人員的基本權(quán)利保障[D];四川師范大學(xué);2013年

3 李麗;社區(qū)矯正人員勞動(dòng)權(quán)保障若干問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

4 蔣海彬;我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正人員實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

5 李寅旭;社區(qū)矯正隊(duì)伍建設(shè)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

6 譚龍;基于J2EE的社區(qū)矯正人員監(jiān)管系統(tǒng)[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

7 林勇;廣東省社區(qū)矯正人員管理研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

8 駱躍軍;社區(qū)矯正信息管理系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];電子科技大學(xué);2014年

9 蔣芷琳;我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正的困境與解決路徑[D];貴州師范大學(xué);2015年

10 彭璇;社區(qū)矯正減刑制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2066483