發(fā)布時間：2018-01-01 08:08

  本文關鍵詞：基于網(wǎng)絡DEA的公路工程代建項目績效評價研究　出處：《河北工程大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 網(wǎng)絡DEA 代建項目 績效評價

【摘要】：政府投資是宏觀經(jīng)濟調控的重要手段,是政府實施經(jīng)濟管理職能的重要方式,公共項目一直都是我國政府投資的重點,為了進一步提高政府投資建設項目的建設管理水平,改革投資項目管理方式,理順政府投資項目建設中政府的地位和職能關系,合理確定建設主體,提高政府投資的效率和效益,國家推行出“代建制”經(jīng)營模式。國家“十二五”規(guī)劃中加大了全社會交通固定資產(chǎn)投資,自新疆交通運輸廳的數(shù)字表明:2011年至2013年,新疆在建高速公路3933公里,其中代建高速公路1933公里,占49%。2013年新疆共完成交通固定資產(chǎn)投資352億元,其中代建項目完成226.76億元,占近65%。由此可以看到針對個別省份的公路建設管理力量不夠,大規(guī)模高速公路建設經(jīng)驗不足的情況,“代建制”模式依然被當作首選。在當前情況下,如何建立一套科學、有效的工程項目代建制績效評價指標體系,同時對代建的工程項目實施過程和效果進行評價,確保代建項目處于可控狀態(tài),并且根據(jù)評價結果對代建單位實施有效的激勵和懲罰措施,關系到工程項目代建制實施能否取得成功。本文以我國公路工程“代建制”經(jīng)營模式績效評價為選題,在參考國內外相關研究成果基礎上,對選題的必要性和可行性進行分析,采用網(wǎng)絡DEA方法,建立了相應的績效評價指標體系。選取8個公路工程代建制項目(決策單元)作為評價對象,收集各決策單元的評價指標數(shù)據(jù),并對所有數(shù)據(jù)進行指標的量綱統(tǒng)一,將量綱統(tǒng)一后的數(shù)據(jù)代入兩階段網(wǎng)絡DEA模型,從而得出8個決策單元的第一階段和第二階段的技術效率(CRS)、純技術效率(VRS)、規(guī)模效率(SE),對兩個階段的效率值進行對比分析,從而找出分別導致兩個階段的經(jīng)營績效低下原因,并提出不同階段的相關改善建議。與傳統(tǒng)DEA效率結果相比看出網(wǎng)絡DEA方法更適用與公路工程代建制經(jīng)營績效評價。
[Abstract]:Government investment is an important means of macroeconomic regulation and control, is an important way for the government to implement economic management functions, public projects have been the focus of our government investment. In order to further improve the level of construction management of government investment and construction projects, reform the management of investment projects, straighten out the position and function of the government in the construction of government investment projects, and rationally determine the main body of construction. To improve the efficiency and efficiency of government investment, the state has implemented the "agent system" mode of operation. In the "12th Five-Year Plan", the state has increased the investment in fixed assets of the whole society. Figures from Xinjiang Traffic and Transportation Department show that from 2011 to 2013, 3, 933 kilometers of expressway is under construction in Xinjiang, of which 1933 kilometers of highway is under construction. The total investment of transportation fixed assets in Xinjiang was 35.2 billion yuan, of which twenty-two billion six hundred and seventy-six million yuan was completed on behalf of the construction project. From this, we can see that the highway construction management strength is not enough for individual provinces, and the large-scale expressway construction experience is not enough, the "agent system" model is still regarded as the first choice. How to set up a set of scientific and effective performance evaluation index system of engineering project construction system, at the same time to evaluate the implementation process and effect of the construction project, to ensure that the agent construction project is in a controllable state. And according to the evaluation results of the agency to implement effective incentives and penalties. Related to the success of the implementation of the project agent system. This paper based on the performance evaluation of the "agent system" management model of highway engineering in China, on the basis of reference to the relevant research results at home and abroad. This paper analyzes the necessity and feasibility of selecting the topic, establishes the corresponding performance evaluation index system by using the network DEA method, and selects 8 highway engineering agent construction projects (decision making units) as the evaluation objects. The evaluation index data of each decision making unit are collected, and all the data are unified in dimension, and the data after dimensionality unification are substituted into the two-stage network DEA model. Thus, the technical efficiency of the first and second stages of the eight decision making units is obtained. The technical efficiency of the eight decision-making units is compared with that of the technical efficiency in the first and second stages, the pure technical efficiency and the scale efficiency are compared and analyzed. In order to find out the causes of the two phases of the low performance of the operation. Compared with the traditional DEA efficiency results, the network DEA method is more suitable to evaluate the performance of highway engineering agent management.
【學位授予單位】：河北工程大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F542.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 韓松;王二明;;中國商業(yè)銀行整體效率研究——基于具有中間投入和中間產(chǎn)出的綜合網(wǎng)絡DEA模型[J];經(jīng)濟理論與經(jīng)濟管理;2015年08期

2 王松;;代建方如何做好政府投資項目的造價控制[J];四川水泥;2015年04期

3 劉瑞波;邊志強;;基于兩階段關聯(lián)DEA的高速公路上市公司經(jīng)營效率研究[J];山東財政學院學報;2011年03期

4 王龍;;平衡計分卡核心理念探析[J];科技管理研究;2010年24期

5 陳偉;趙富洋;林艷;;基于兩階段DEA的高技術產(chǎn)業(yè)R&D績效評價研究[J];軟科學;2010年04期

6 韓美貴;金德智;;政府投資項目代建人績效評價指標體系研究[J];科技管理研究;2009年07期

7 張靜;楊彥萍;;基于BSC的政府投資項目代建單位績效評價指標體系研究[J];煤炭經(jīng)濟研究;2009年01期

8 杜亞靈;尹貽林;嚴玲;;公共項目績效改善研究:風險分配途徑[J];科技管理研究;2008年05期

9 漆玉娟;鄭佰靜;;政府投資項目代建單位績效考評指標體系的構建[J];基建優(yōu)化;2007年04期

10 廖亮;;我國政府投資項目代建制模式發(fā)展趨勢的思考[J];中國招標;2006年Z1期

，

本文編號：1363633