發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-05 06:38

  本文選題：城鎮(zhèn)化 + 農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)��； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，給城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程提供了充足的動(dòng)力，但經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速增長(zhǎng)主要依靠外延擴(kuò)張，是基于對(duì)城市邊緣區(qū)耕地資源的占用。本文所研究的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)指的是城鎮(zhèn)化建設(shè)中的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)，主要是指土地資源從農(nóng)業(yè)用地變更為城市建設(shè)用地的過(guò)程，是資源重新分配和利用的過(guò)程。面對(duì)越來(lái)越嚴(yán)重的農(nóng)村土地城市化，為了追求最大的經(jīng)濟(jì)效益和社會(huì)效益，必須提高土地生產(chǎn)效率和配置效率，盡最大可能減少農(nóng)村土地資源的損失，對(duì)于單個(gè)區(qū)域或整個(gè)社會(huì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)可持續(xù)發(fā)展具有積極而重要的意義。 本文從農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率的角度,以生產(chǎn)前沿面理論作為理論依據(jù),采用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析方法對(duì)不同研究區(qū)域的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率進(jìn)行比較全面的分析，主要研究?jī)?nèi)容有兩方面：一是為實(shí)現(xiàn)資源最優(yōu)配置，研究如何使資源與效益的投入產(chǎn)出比最小化，分別對(duì)資源配置在不同經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下的表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行分析，對(duì)土地資源市場(chǎng)配置和政府配置的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行對(duì)比。二是分析制度環(huán)境對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率的影響。在DEA模型的基礎(chǔ)上，將收集來(lái)的真實(shí)數(shù)據(jù)作為研究對(duì)象，對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率受到的制度環(huán)境影響進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析，并根據(jù)分析結(jié)果提出提高農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率的建議。 經(jīng)過(guò)分析研究，本文得到結(jié)論是:制度環(huán)境變量對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率有顯著影響，不考慮制度環(huán)境因素的影響，具有制度優(yōu)勢(shì)地區(qū)的效率會(huì)被高估，而處于制度劣勢(shì)地區(qū)的效率會(huì)被低估。在本文中，對(duì)技術(shù)效率的實(shí)證分析采用三階段DEA模型，選擇影響農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率但不在主觀可控范圍內(nèi)的因素，側(cè)重考慮對(duì)農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)配置效率有影響的制度環(huán)境變量。測(cè)算得出制度環(huán)境變量對(duì)各地區(qū)技術(shù)效率具有顯著影響，經(jīng)環(huán)境變量調(diào)整后的各地區(qū)技術(shù)效率水平顯著下降，其中西部地區(qū)下降幅度最大，說(shuō)明制度環(huán)境變遷將有利于對(duì)西部地區(qū)技術(shù)效率的進(jìn)一步改善，其作用也最為顯著。1999-2008年間，區(qū)域間流轉(zhuǎn)技術(shù)效率差異明顯，東部的技術(shù)效率水平最高，其次為中部地區(qū)，最后為西部地區(qū)；純技術(shù)效率差異不顯著,東部的純技術(shù)效率水平最高,其次為西部地區(qū)和中部地區(qū)；區(qū)域間流轉(zhuǎn)的規(guī)模效率差異顯著，東部地區(qū)的規(guī)模效率值顯著大于中、西部地區(qū)，但三大區(qū)域的效率值都有很大的提升空間，都未達(dá)到最優(yōu)規(guī)模。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of China's economy has provided sufficient impetus for the urbanization process, but the rapid economic growth mainly depends on the extension expansion, which is based on the occupation of cultivated land resources in the urban fringe areas. The rural land circulation studied in this paper refers to the rural land circulation in the construction of urbanization, mainly refers to the process of land resources changing from agricultural land to urban construction land, and the process of resource redistribution and utilization. In the face of more and more serious urbanization of rural land, in order to pursue the maximum economic and social benefits, we must improve the efficiency of land production and allocation, and minimize the loss of rural land resources as far as possible. It has positive and important significance for the economic sustainable development of a single region or the whole society. In this paper, from the perspective of the allocation efficiency of rural land circulation, with the production frontier theory as the theoretical basis, using the method of data envelopment analysis to analyze the allocation efficiency of rural land circulation in different research areas. The main research contents are as follows: first, in order to realize the optimal allocation of resources, the paper studies how to minimize the input-output ratio of resources to benefits, and analyzes the manifestation of resource allocation under different economic conditions. The characteristics of land resource market allocation and government allocation are compared. The second is to analyze the impact of institutional environment on the transfer of rural land allocation efficiency. On the basis of DEA model, the real data collected are taken as the research object, and the institutional environment impact on the allocation efficiency of rural land circulation is analyzed empirically, and the suggestions to improve the allocation efficiency of rural land circulation are put forward according to the analysis results. Through analysis and research, this paper concludes that the institutional environment variables have a significant impact on the allocation efficiency of rural land circulation, and the efficiency of areas with institutional advantages will be overestimated without considering the impact of institutional environmental factors. And the efficiency of the region in institutional inferiority will be underestimated. In this paper, the empirical analysis of technical efficiency adopts the three-stage DEA model to select the factors that affect the allocation efficiency of rural land transfer but are not within the scope of subjective control. Focus on the consideration of the transfer of rural land allocation efficiency of the institutional environment variables. It is estimated that the institutional environmental variables have a significant impact on the technical efficiency of each region. After adjusting the environmental variables, the level of technical efficiency of each region has decreased significantly, and the western region has the largest decline. It shows that the change of institutional environment will benefit the further improvement of the technical efficiency in the western region, and its effect is also the most significant. During 1999-2008, the difference of the technical efficiency between regions is obvious, the level of technical efficiency in the east is the highest, and the second is the central region. Finally, the difference of pure technical efficiency is not significant, the level of pure technical efficiency is the highest in the east, followed by the western region and the central region, the scale efficiency of the inter-regional circulation is significant, the scale efficiency of the eastern region is significantly higher than that of the middle region. In the western region, however, the efficiency of the three regions has great room for improvement and has not reached the optimal scale.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F299.21;F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐瓊;技術(shù)效率與前沿面理論評(píng)述[J];財(cái)經(jīng)論叢(浙江財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2005年02期

2 楊志榮;吳次芳;靳相木;姚秋萍;;基于DEA模型的城市用地經(jīng)濟(jì)效益比較研究[J];長(zhǎng)江流域資源與環(huán)境;2009年01期

3 蓋國(guó)鳳;資源配置效率測(cè)度與前沿生產(chǎn)函數(shù)[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問題研究;1998年11期

4 郭貫成;吳群;;供地政策對(duì)土地市場(chǎng)配置效率影響的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析——理論研究與實(shí)踐檢驗(yàn)[J];地域研究與開發(fā);2009年01期

5 方先知;土地利用效率測(cè)度的指標(biāo)體系與方法研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2004年12期

6 張大勇;馬增林;余志剛;;城鎮(zhèn)化過(guò)程中的土地配置問題及對(duì)策[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年05期

7 胡曉珍;張衛(wèi)東;楊龍;;制度環(huán)境、技術(shù)效率與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)差異[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

8 吳郁玲;馮忠壘;曲福田;;比較優(yōu)勢(shì)理論與開發(fā)區(qū)土地資源配置效率的地區(qū)差異分析[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2006年03期

9 但承龍,雍新琴,厲偉;土地利用結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化模型及決策方法——江蘇啟東市的實(shí)證分析[J];華南熱帶農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

10 海鷹;孫佟;明紹利;;蘭格模式的再思考[J];科教文匯(中旬刊);2008年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1981009