發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-21 15:31

  本文選題：“337調(diào)查”　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　出處：《安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中美兩國(guó)自1979年建交以來(lái),雙邊貿(mào)易取得了長(zhǎng)足發(fā)展,但貿(mào)易摩擦也從未停息。隨著我國(guó)對(duì)美出口產(chǎn)品結(jié)構(gòu)的不斷升級(jí),“337調(diào)查”逐漸取代過(guò)去的“兩反一�！贝胧┏蔀橘Q(mào)易摩擦的主要手段。針對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象,本文在前人研究的基礎(chǔ)上,從四個(gè)方面對(duì)“337調(diào)查”進(jìn)行討論。首先,從“337調(diào)查”制度的起源,調(diào)查程序以及救濟(jì)措施三個(gè)方面對(duì)“337調(diào)查”制度進(jìn)行概述,而后分析美國(guó)對(duì)華“337調(diào)查”的現(xiàn)狀,并得出如下結(jié)論:我國(guó)是“337調(diào)查”的首要對(duì)象國(guó)、申請(qǐng)人的主要訴由為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)、中國(guó)企業(yè)的敗訴率高以及機(jī)電產(chǎn)品是主要被訴對(duì)象。其次,從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)角度探討了美國(guó)對(duì)華發(fā)起“337調(diào)查”的原因。認(rèn)為宏觀方面的原因有三個(gè),即美國(guó)維護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì),兩國(guó)專(zhuān)利競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力相差懸殊致使我國(guó)產(chǎn)品易侵權(quán)以及美國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義抬頭;而微觀方面的原因也有三個(gè),即企業(yè)應(yīng)訴不積極,“337調(diào)查”的特點(diǎn)是“337調(diào)查”多發(fā)的重要原因,我國(guó)企業(yè)缺乏自主知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)意識(shí)。接著分析了中國(guó)JW公司成功應(yīng)訴日本KC公司“337調(diào)查”的經(jīng)典案例,并總結(jié)出企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)“337調(diào)查”的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。然后,利用主成分分析法對(duì)“337調(diào)查”進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析以確定引起美國(guó)對(duì)華發(fā)起“337調(diào)查”的主要原因,實(shí)證分析的結(jié)論認(rèn)為:造成美國(guó)對(duì)華發(fā)起“337調(diào)查”的主要誘因是美國(guó)貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義抬頭。最后,提出應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)“337調(diào)查”的對(duì)策。從企業(yè)的角度而言,企業(yè)要提高自主創(chuàng)新能力,實(shí)施市場(chǎng)多元化戰(zhàn)略以及積極在美注冊(cè)專(zhuān)利以獲得專(zhuān)利的交叉許可和制衡;而從政府的角度而言,政府要加大力度實(shí)施知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略并且嘗試建立起中國(guó)式的“337調(diào)查”條款。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States in 1979, bilateral trade has made considerable progress. However, trade friction has never ceased. With the continuous upgrading of China's export product structure to the United States, the "337 investigation" gradually replaced the past "two opposing, one guarantee" measures as the main means of trade friction. On the basis of previous studies, this paper discusses "337 investigation" from four aspects. Firstly, it summarizes the system of "337 investigation" from three aspects: the origin of "337 investigation" system, the investigation procedure and the relief measures. Then it analyzes the current situation of "337 investigation" in the United States, and draws the following conclusions: China is the primary target country of "337 investigation", and the main cause of the applicant's action is intellectual property infringement. The high rate of defeat of Chinese enterprises and the fact that mechanical and electrical products are the main objects of prosecution. Secondly, this paper discusses the causes of the "337 investigation" initiated by the United States in China from the macro and micro perspectives. It is believed that there are three reasons for the macro aspects. That is, the United States maintains the competitive advantage of intellectual property rights, and the disparity in patent competitiveness between the two countries has led to the rise of US trade protectionism and product infringement in China. There are also three reasons for the microcosmic reasons. That is, enterprises are not active in responding to complaints, and the characteristics of "337 investigation" are the important reasons for the frequent occurrence of "337 investigation". Chinese enterprises lack the consciousness of independent intellectual property rights and intellectual property protection. Then, this paper analyzes the classic cases of Chinese JW Company successfully responding to the "337 investigation" of Japanese KC Company, and sums up the experiences of the enterprises in dealing with the "337 investigation" in the United States. The principal component analysis method is used to make an empirical analysis of the 337 Survey to determine the main reasons that caused the US to launch the 337 Survey in China. The conclusion of the empirical analysis is that the main inducement of the "337 investigation" is the rise of American trade protectionism. Finally, the countermeasures to deal with the "337 survey" are put forward. From the perspective of enterprises, enterprises should improve their independent innovation ability. Implement a market diversification strategy and actively register patents in the United States to obtain cross-licensing and checks and balances; and from the government's point of view, The government will step up efforts to implement the IPR national strategy and try to establish a Chinese-style Section 337 investigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D822.371.2;F741.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉新民;;試論中國(guó)式337調(diào)查制度的構(gòu)建[J];行政與法;2016年01期

2 李s，

本文編號(hào)：1644466