宏觀審慎政策對(duì)房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格的影響研究
[Abstract]:After the reform and opening up, the state has put forward a series of reforms aimed at the macro-control system of real estate. The real estate industry of our country has reached a new height and become the pillar industry of our country. With the rapid development of the economy, The substantial increase in the income of Chinese citizens and the shortage of housing due to the natural laws of the market have led to a rapid rise in housing prices in recent years. Many countries in the world have experienced excessive real estate development, and excessive rise in housing prices has led to the accumulation of bubbles. Finally, the national economy as a whole is endangered by the precedent. It has been publicly accepted that macroprudential policies are more effective than other policies in controlling house prices. The central bank controls the real estate market by macroprudential policy in order to restrain the house price, reduce the real estate heat, make it develop smoothly, and play a vital role in the stability of our country's financial market and even the national economy. Therefore, it is imperative to study the relationship between house prices and macro-prudential policies. It is of great practical significance to discover and deeply explore the economic laws behind them and provide corresponding policy recommendations. In view of the severity of the financial crisis in 2008, this paper selects the quarterly data on house prices from 2005 to 2015 and the corresponding interest rates, money supply, loan value ratio, GDP growth rate, leverage ratio, consumer price index. The loan value ratio (LTV) is used as a macroprudential proxy variable. The VAR model is used to test the effect of macro-prudential policy on housing price, and the effects of macro-prudential policy on the price fluctuation, the mechanism and the optimal policy combination are analyzed. The research shows that the fluctuation of house price is often the main source of systemic financial risk, but the singularity of monetary policy regulation can not completely make the financial stability. To solve the problem of housing price regulation, we must apply macroprudential policy appropriately. The principal variable loan value ratio (LTV) of macroprudential policy instrument is used to restrain the resident's credit behavior and to coordinate with other appropriate policies so as to reduce the fluctuation of house price most effectively. Although some foreign scholars have studied the influence of macroprudential on housing prices, it is not difficult to find out that the first is the separation of theory and practice, and there is no good combination analysis; The second is a panoramic analysis of the macro-prudential framework, lacking research on the use of a specific policy tool; third, domestic studies on the relationship between a single monetary policy and housing prices; and fourth, even if there is a macro-prudential study. Most of them are from the point of view of its effect on the whole financial industry, but there are few literatures to analyze the effect of macroprudential policy on house price by combining theory and practice. Therefore, this paper uses the model to test the empirical effect of macro-prudential policy on housing price, and puts forward the corresponding policy measures, and analyzes the effect of macro-prudential policy on housing price fluctuation. The mechanism of action and the optimal policy combination and so on. It is helpful to explore the influence mechanism of macroprudential policy on house price and help to control house price better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:F299.23
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 于一;何維達(dá);;貨幣政策、信貸質(zhì)量與銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];國(guó)際金融研究;2011年12期
2 肖爭(zhēng)艷;彭博;;住房?jī)r(jià)格與中國(guó)貨幣政策規(guī)則[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2011年11期
3 覃豪;;淺析房地產(chǎn)宏觀調(diào)控政策兩難困局及政策建議[J];中國(guó)城市經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年23期
4 張振勇;;論我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)預(yù)警系統(tǒng)的建立[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年08期
5 譚政勛;王聰;;中國(guó)信貸擴(kuò)張、房?jī)r(jià)波動(dòng)的金融穩(wěn)定效應(yīng)研究——?jiǎng)討B(tài)隨機(jī)一般均衡模型視角[J];金融研究;2011年08期
6 張橋云;郎波;;美國(guó)住房金融市場(chǎng):運(yùn)行機(jī)制、監(jiān)管改革及對(duì)中國(guó)的啟示[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)體制比較;2011年03期
7 李曉霞;;抑制我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)過(guò)度投機(jī)的政策研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2011年04期
8 馮科;;中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)在貨幣政策傳導(dǎo)機(jī)制中的作用研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2011年04期
9 王培輝;;中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格泡沫原因分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2011年03期
,本文編號(hào):2284173
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/2284173.html