發(fā)布時間：2018-04-24 00:17

  本文選題：互補性關(guān)系 + 競爭性關(guān)系　； 參考：《長沙理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：2008年金融危機的爆發(fā)，暴露出美國經(jīng)濟金融化及消費拉動戰(zhàn)略的缺陷，美國政府試圖將經(jīng)濟拉回到實體經(jīng)濟發(fā)展軌道，逆向選擇現(xiàn)有國際分工，提出了“再工業(yè)化”戰(zhàn)略。隨著中國資源要素稟賦的收窄，房地產(chǎn)價格的攀升，環(huán)境的惡化，，人口紅利也不斷壓縮，傳統(tǒng)制造產(chǎn)業(yè)的比較優(yōu)勢逐步消褪，而現(xiàn)今中國又積累了豐厚的知識、技術(shù)及財富，提出了“戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)”。隨著中美兩國均將制造業(yè)發(fā)展目標(biāo)放在高端制造產(chǎn)業(yè)方面，在全球市場規(guī)模、原材料市場、人才資本等生產(chǎn)要素一定的前提下，兩國制造業(yè)長期以來的互補性關(guān)系將轉(zhuǎn)變。 本論文以拓展的比較優(yōu)勢和制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移為依據(jù)，通過對改革開放至美國“再工業(yè)”期間中美對外貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)、中美制造業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)及2008年中美雙邊貿(mào)易數(shù)據(jù)比較，系統(tǒng)地分析了中美制造業(yè)長期的互補性關(guān)系的形成及原因。通過對歷年的美國制造業(yè)就業(yè)人數(shù)變化、歷年美國制造業(yè)相關(guān)指標(biāo)、歷年中美高科技出口占制成品出口的比重及2010年中美雙邊貿(mào)易主要商品構(gòu)成比較，指出“再工業(yè)化”以后，中美長期的互補性關(guān)系正在逐步轉(zhuǎn)變�；�于上述結(jié)論，選取中美制造業(yè)出口結(jié)構(gòu)相似度指標(biāo)，運用核密度估計(Kernel density)方法，通過實證界定了中美制造業(yè)競爭性趨勢。此外，基于產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭優(yōu)勢理論，從中美制造業(yè)在全球范圍內(nèi)的競爭力、出口地位、原材料需求及制造業(yè)產(chǎn)品供給等角度，進(jìn)一步證實兩國制造業(yè)競爭性趨勢的形成。 本文認(rèn)為隨著中美制造業(yè)的不斷發(fā)展，尤其是美國制造業(yè)重振與中國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的推行，兩國制造業(yè)競爭趨勢會逐步深化，但互補性也仍會作為一種形態(tài)存在。同時，指出雖然中美制造業(yè)處于競爭性趨勢，但并不意味著中國與美國關(guān)系的對立，而是應(yīng)該擴大合作，謀求共同發(fā)展。中國應(yīng)基于中美制造業(yè)的競爭力分析，從制造業(yè)發(fā)展方向、科技創(chuàng)新、人力儲備及原材料等方面，構(gòu)建競爭性趨勢下中國制造業(yè)發(fā)展思路。
[Abstract]:The outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008 exposed the defects of American economic financialization and consumption-driven strategy. The American government tried to pull the economy back into the real economic development orbit, reverse selected the existing international division of labor, and put forward the strategy of "reindustrialization". With the narrowing of China's resource factor endowment, the rise of real estate prices, the deterioration of the environment, the continuous compression of the demographic dividend, the gradual erosion of the comparative advantage of the traditional manufacturing industry, and the accumulation of rich knowledge, technology and wealth in China today, Put forward "strategic emerging industry". With both China and the United States focusing on the high-end manufacturing industry, the long-term complementary relationship between the two countries' manufacturing industries will change under the premise of certain factors of production such as global market size, raw material market, human capital and so on. Based on the comparative advantage of expansion and the industrial transfer of manufacturing industry, this paper compares the Sino-American foreign trade data, the Sino-American manufacturing data and the bilateral trade data in 2008 between China and the United States during the period of reform and opening up to the "re-industry" of the United States. This paper systematically analyzes the formation and causes of long-term complementary relationship between Chinese and American manufacturing industries. By comparing the changes in manufacturing employment in the past years, the relative indicators of manufacturing industry in the past years, the proportion of Sino-American high-tech exports in manufactured exports over the years and the main commodity composition of Sino-US bilateral trade in 2010, it is pointed out that after "re-industrialization", The long-term complementary relationship between China and the United States is gradually changing. Based on the above conclusions, this paper selects the similarity index of manufacturing export structure between China and the United States, and uses the Kernel density estimation method to define the competitive trend of manufacturing industry in China and the United States empirically. In addition, based on the theory of industrial competitive advantage, this paper further proves the formation of the competitive trend of the manufacturing industry of the two countries from the perspectives of the global competitiveness, export status, raw material demand and manufacturing product supply of China and the United States. This paper holds that with the continuous development of Sino-US manufacturing industry, especially the revival of American manufacturing industry and the implementation of China's strategic emerging industries, the competitive trend of manufacturing industry between the two countries will be deepened gradually, but complementarity will still exist as a form. At the same time, it is pointed out that although the manufacturing industry between China and the United States is in a competitive trend, it does not mean the antagonism between China and the United States, but should expand cooperation and seek common development. Based on the analysis of the competitiveness of Chinese and American manufacturing industry, China should construct the development thinking of Chinese manufacturing industry under the competitive trend from the aspects of manufacturing development direction, scientific and technological innovation, manpower reserve and raw materials.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F424;F471.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 夏先良;;中美貿(mào)易失衡、產(chǎn)業(yè)分工與美國失業(yè)率[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年11期

2 殷醒民;;21世紀(jì)初中美制造能力差距縮小的證據(jù)及戰(zhàn)略含義[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

3 陳立敏;王璇;饒思源;;中美制造業(yè)國際競爭力比較:基于產(chǎn)業(yè)競爭力層次觀點的實證分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2009年06期

4 蔣欽云;;我國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)劃與美國重振制造業(yè)框架比較研究[J];國際經(jīng)濟合作;2012年01期

5 梁碧波;;美國的貿(mào)易保護(hù):“國家利益”決定抑或“利益集團”導(dǎo)向——基于美國制造業(yè)的實證分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2009年09期

6 劉建江;楊細(xì)珍;;產(chǎn)品內(nèi)分工視角下中美貿(mào)易失衡中的貿(mào)易利益研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2011年08期

7 袁冬梅;;美國制造業(yè)重振面臨的人才儲備挑戰(zhàn)[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2012年04期

8 胡昭玲;張詠華;;中國制造業(yè)國際垂直專業(yè)化分工鏈條分析——基于非競爭型投入產(chǎn)出表的測算[J];財經(jīng)科學(xué);2012年09期

9 邢玉升;曹利戰(zhàn);;中國制造業(yè)出口貿(mào)易的技術(shù)水平——測度及行業(yè)特征檢驗[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

10 李新功;;國際貨幣體系錯配與中國制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新途徑探析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟研究;2012年10期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 廖雯婷;中美貿(mào)易失衡的原因和對策探究[D];南京大學(xué);2011年

2 樊淑娟;新型國際分工下的中國制造業(yè)國際競爭力研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：1794284