發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 14:31

  本文選題：省會(huì)城市 + 房地產(chǎn)業(yè)　； 參考：《山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)業(yè)作為國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要產(chǎn)業(yè),在自身產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展取得巨大成就的同時(shí),促進(jìn)了經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長(zhǎng),增加了社會(huì)就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),在改善民生方面也發(fā)揮著不可忽視的作用。因此,研究房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展水平很有必要。自2004年實(shí)施中部崛起戰(zhàn)略以來(lái),我國(guó)中部六省房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展取得較大進(jìn)步,但相比東部沿海省市,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展實(shí)力仍較弱,并且六省的房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r也存在明顯差異。本文對(duì)比研究六省省會(huì)城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展水平,以期為六省會(huì)城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展提供可行的建議,促進(jìn)六市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的持續(xù)健康發(fā)展。本文基于文獻(xiàn)分析法和系統(tǒng)研究法,圍繞房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)、商品房建設(shè)、商品房銷售、房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)和房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)模,選取了20個(gè)指標(biāo),構(gòu)建了房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,并選用二級(jí)指標(biāo),對(duì)比分析了六省會(huì)城市的房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀。為綜合評(píng)價(jià)六省會(huì)城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展水平,利用2010-2014年六省會(huì)城市五年數(shù)據(jù)的平均值構(gòu)造指標(biāo)原始數(shù)據(jù)矩陣,運(yùn)用熵值法進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,計(jì)算了六城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平的綜合得分和各指標(biāo)得分,得出了綜合排名:鄭州市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平最高,長(zhǎng)沙市次之,合肥市和武漢市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平處于中間水平,分別位列第三和第四,太原市和南昌市位列第五和第六。僅從綜合排名的高低難以反映六市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的具體差異。因此,本文進(jìn)一步對(duì)實(shí)證研究中六省會(huì)城市一級(jí)指標(biāo)和二級(jí)指標(biāo)的得分進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)出了六省會(huì)城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的優(yōu)劣勢(shì)。并結(jié)合中部六省會(huì)城市房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的狀況和優(yōu)劣勢(shì),總結(jié)出六省會(huì)城市在房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展過(guò)程中存在的共性問(wèn)題和個(gè)性問(wèn)題,針對(duì)共性問(wèn)題,從政府層面提出強(qiáng)化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策引導(dǎo)、優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)、促進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)、構(gòu)建多元化融資體系和完善預(yù)警預(yù)報(bào)監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)五項(xiàng)建議,從企業(yè)層面提出增強(qiáng)企業(yè)大局意識(shí)、加強(qiáng)企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)管理和樹(shù)立房地產(chǎn)業(yè)精品意識(shí)三項(xiàng)建議;針對(duì)個(gè)性問(wèn)題,從揚(yáng)優(yōu)勢(shì)和補(bǔ)劣勢(shì)的角度提出建議。本文將研究對(duì)象細(xì)化到市域范圍,并且不局限于同一省的行政區(qū)劃,而是以經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平具有可比性的中部六省的省會(huì)城市為研究對(duì)象,更具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和指導(dǎo)意義。其次,本文在指標(biāo)的選取上大多采用了相對(duì)指標(biāo),增強(qiáng)了可比性,更能充分反映地區(qū)間房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平的差異。
[Abstract]:As an important industry in the development of national economy, the real estate industry has made great achievements in the development of its own industry, at the same time, it has promoted the economic growth, increased the social employment opportunities, and played an important role in improving the livelihood of the people. Therefore, it is necessary to study the development level of real estate industry. Since the implementation of the central rising strategy in 2004, the development of the real estate industry in the six provinces of central China has made great progress, but compared with the eastern coastal provinces, the strength of the real estate industry development is still relatively weak, and there are obvious differences in the development situation of the real estate industry in the six provinces. This paper compares the development level of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals in order to provide feasible suggestions for the development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals and to promote the sustained and healthy development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals. Based on the method of literature analysis and systematic research, this paper selects 20 indexes around the development of real estate, the construction of commercial housing, the sale of commercial housing, the management of real estate enterprises and the scale of real estate industry. This paper constructs the evaluation index system of the development level of the real estate industry, and selects the secondary index, and compares and analyzes the present situation of the development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals. In order to comprehensively evaluate the development level of real estate industry in six provincial capitals, using the average of the five year data of six provincial capitals from 2010 to 2014 to construct the original index data matrix, the entropy method is used to carry on the empirical research. The comprehensive scores and index scores of the development level of the real estate industry in six cities are calculated, and the comprehensive ranking is obtained: the real estate industry development level of Zhengzhou is the highest, Changsha is the second, and the real estate development level of Hefei and Wuhan is in the middle level. Taiyuan City and Nanchang City ranked fifth and sixth, respectively. Only from the level of comprehensive ranking can not reflect the six cities real estate development of the specific differences. Therefore, this paper further analyzes the scores of the first and second class indexes of the six provincial capitals, and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals. Combined with the development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals of central China, this paper summarizes the common and individual problems in the development of the real estate industry in the six provincial capitals, aiming at the common problems. Five suggestions are put forward from the government level to strengthen the industrial policy guidance, optimize the industrial internal structure, promote the industrial upgrading, construct the diversified financing system and perfect the early-warning, forecast and monitoring system, and put forward five suggestions from the enterprise level to enhance the overall situation consciousness of the enterprise. This paper puts forward three suggestions on strengthening the management of enterprises and establishing the consciousness of fine goods in real estate industry, and puts forward some suggestions from the angle of promoting the advantages and complementing the inferiority in view of the personality problems. This paper classifies the research object into the scope of the city, and not limited to the administrative division of the same province, but takes the provincial capitals of the six provinces with comparable economic development level as the research object, which has practical significance and guiding significance. Secondly, the selection of indicators in this paper mostly used relative indicators, enhance comparability, more fully reflect the development level of regional real estate differences.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 "對(duì)我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展的分析與思考"課題組;賈海;葉劍平;;我國(guó)大中城市房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)發(fā)展水平評(píng)價(jià)[J];調(diào)研世界;2016年01期

2 王雪微;王士君;范大龍;宋樝;;我國(guó)各省市地區(qū)房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)情況研究[J];資源開(kāi)發(fā)與市場(chǎng);2015年12期

3 仇兵奎;張惠;;武漢市城鎮(zhèn)化與房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展耦合協(xié)調(diào)度分析[J];地域研究與開(kāi)發(fā);2015年02期

4 夏貝貝;張雅淋;;房地產(chǎn)業(yè)與國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展關(guān)系研究——基于中國(guó)30個(gè)省會(huì)城市的實(shí)證分析[J];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

5 蘇艷艷;史新宇;梁朋朋;關(guān)中美;;河南省房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平空間格局研究[J];資源開(kāi)發(fā)與市場(chǎng);2015年03期

6 馬偉龍;;基于因子分析的四川省市域房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展水平分析[J];綿陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年11期

7 李子倫;;需求層次理論視角下中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展的邏輯缺陷[J];西安交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

8 周達(dá);;建立房地產(chǎn)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系監(jiān)測(cè)首都房地產(chǎn)的發(fā)展水平[J];中華建設(shè);2014年08期

9 夏春光;張英佳;李雪銘;;省域房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)綜合評(píng)價(jià)與時(shí)空差異研究[J];商業(yè)時(shí)代;2014年17期

10 曹宇;;中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展歷程[J];企業(yè)技術(shù)開(kāi)發(fā);2014年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張鶴;南昌市房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)可持續(xù)發(fā)展評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

2 吳偉倫;房地產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展水平及影響因素研究[D];河北工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

3 郭秀秀;房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)健康狀況評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2012年

4 薛宏磊;吉林省房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展水平的地域差異研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1778155