本文選題：房地產(chǎn)市場 + 行政規(guī)制�。� 參考：《華東政法大學學報》2017年01期

【摘要】：近十年來國家和地方對房地產(chǎn)市場的行政干預措施運用了各類規(guī)制手段、影響到諸多市場主體的權利,然而,運用一般的規(guī)制理論卻很難評價這些措施的得失及其在法治層面的缺陷。究其原因,在于學界尚未就作為規(guī)制對象的我國房地產(chǎn)市場和作為規(guī)制目的的房地產(chǎn)市場與宏觀經(jīng)濟關系,以及國家在經(jīng)濟活動中的主導地位對房地產(chǎn)規(guī)制產(chǎn)生的影響三者展開充分的認識和研究。我國房地產(chǎn)市場規(guī)制具有規(guī)制者與被規(guī)制者重合、微觀產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)制與宏觀經(jīng)濟高度相關的特殊之處。因此,打破規(guī)制者與被規(guī)制者的重合、客觀評價規(guī)制機關的獨立性、建立穩(wěn)定的規(guī)制框架以及提高可負擔性住房權利的地位等視角應在規(guī)制方案設計時受到重視。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, the administrative intervention measures of the state and the local authorities in the real estate market have applied various regulatory measures, which have affected the rights of many market subjects, however, However, it is difficult to evaluate the gains and losses of these measures and their defects in the level of rule of law by using the general regulation theory. The reason lies in the fact that there is no relationship between the real estate market, which is the object of regulation, and the real estate market, which is the object of regulation, and the macro-economy. And the influence of the leading position of the state in the economic activities on the real estate regulation is fully understood and studied. The regulation of the real estate market in China has the special features of the superposition of the regulators and the regulated ones, and the high correlation between the micro industrial regulation and the macro economy. Therefore, the perspective of breaking the coincidence between the regulator and the regulated, objectively evaluating the independence of the regulatory body, establishing a stable regulatory framework and improving the status of affordable housing rights should be paid attention to in the design of the regulatory scheme.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學法學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金一般項目“住房調控與保障的行政法研究”(項目號14BFX034)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：D922.29

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 謝昌浩,阮萍;對房地產(chǎn)市場中空置問題的界定及衡量[J];中國青年政治學院學報;2002年02期

2 劉洪玉 ,鄭思齊 ,沈悅;房地產(chǎn)市場“泡沫”還是“過熱”[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1775816