城鎮(zhèn)職工養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)中的公平性分析
[Abstract]:Aging is a serious challenge facing the whole world in the 21st century, so it leads to the serious economic and social problems of the whole country. Pension insurance, which is most directly affected by it, has been paid more and more attention by the government, scholars and people. The old-age insurance is a kind of economic welfare policy, which is guided by the government and enforced by the state, which is used to maintain the basic life of the laborer after retirement. Endowment insurance concerns the vital interests of all workers. The Fifth Plenary session of the 17th CPC Central Committee proposed that "improving the social security system covering urban and rural residents, national income redistribution will pay more attention to equity." The third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee adopted the decision on "establishing a more equitable and sustainable social security system" concerning social security for the people's livelihood. This shows that the government has begun to pay more attention to the fairness of pension insurance, and has begun to improve the fairness of the positive reform exploration. Therefore, the author tries to analyze the endowment insurance of urban workers in this stage from the perspective of fairness. This paper makes an understanding of the fair situation of the pension insurance for workers and staff at present, and can provide reference and reference for the future reform of the pension insurance in our country. This paper analyzes the equity of urban pension insurance in China by the method of literature research and comparative analysis. First of all, the basic theory of equity of pension insurance requirements is discussed. On this basis, the connotation of fairness in endowment insurance is analyzed. Then, it analyzes the unfair situation of the urban workers' endowment insurance in China, including the unfairness between different responsible subjects, the unfairness between different regions and cities. The unfairness between units of different nature and the unfairness between different industries. Then, the author makes a detailed discussion on the reasons that hinder the fairness of the old-age insurance for urban workers in China, including the incomplete coverage of the system, the existence of fragmentation of the system, and the imbalance of regional economic development. The reasons for the inequality of political status and other supporting measures of relevant stakeholders. Finally, aiming at the present situation and the reasons, the author puts forward some ideas and countermeasures to improve the equity of urban workers' endowment insurance. It is necessary to strengthen the fairness of social security and share the system concept, establish a unified responsibility and unified rights of the payment system, balance the burden of the government and enterprises, improve the overall planning level of pension insurance funds, establish a shared basic platform; It is necessary to speed up the integration of urban workers' pensions, realize a truly unified social insurance system, increase the amount of insurance fees collected in monopoly industries, and increase the redistribution function of social insurance. Finally, build up a contributory basic endowment insurance system as the core.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:F842.67
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 褚福靈;;論養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)的繳費(fèi)替代率與待遇替代率[J];北京市計(jì)劃勞動(dòng)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期
2 盛和泰;;養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)“碎片化”的成因分析與應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];保險(xiǎn)研究;2011年05期
3 張毅;;轉(zhuǎn)型期養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)支出責(zé)任分擔(dān)的合理性分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年06期
4 楊思斌;;我國(guó)社會(huì)保障制度的公平原則及其實(shí)現(xiàn)途徑[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2007年05期
5 李玲;;中國(guó)社會(huì)保障制度的60年及其公平性研究[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年11期
6 張明麗;王亞萍;張閃閃;;國(guó)外社保整合對(duì)我國(guó)碎片化養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度改革的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和啟示[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2012年07期
7 鄭秉文;;中國(guó)社!八槠贫取蔽:εc“碎片化沖動(dòng)”探源[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年03期
8 曾廣樂(lè);;經(jīng)濟(jì)與道德關(guān)系新論[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年03期
9 肖嚴(yán)華;;中國(guó)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)制度公平問(wèn)題研究[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年08期
10 黎民,曾永泉;政府與企業(yè)在社會(huì)養(yǎng)老保險(xiǎn)中的博弈[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期
本文編號(hào):2199004
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/jingjilunwen/bxjjlw/2199004.html