SST公司不良質(zhì)量成本的形成與改進(jìn)研究
[Abstract]:A. Since Fegenbaum, Julan put forward the concept of quality cost, quality cost management has developed rapidly in many countries, especially in Europe and America, and has been applied in enterprises. For example, International Telegraph and telephone Company, General Electric (GE), (IBM) have established quality cost management system. The application of quality cost management plays a great role in the development of enterprises and winning the trust of customers. However, with the globalization of the world economy, especially the globalization of quality competition and the widening of the concept of quality, the change of quality concept from "applicability" to "customer satisfied OPPM" has put forward more and more high demands on product quality. The continuous improvement of customer requirements and the change of quality concept pose a great challenge to the traditional quality cost theory. After entering the 21 st century, OPPM has become the quality target of many world-class enterprises. In order to achieve this goal, most international enterprises are sparing no effort to promote tools such as 6sigma and lean production, so that the quality and cost of enterprises have been greatly improved. Then in many enterprises have ignored a hidden mountain-poor quality costs. The main reason is that the management of the bad quality cost based on OPPM has put forward very high requirements to the quality control system, quality concept and management level of the enterprise. Meanwhile, the traditional quality cost theory is based on the quality idea of "applicability". Nor can the bad quality cost based on OPPM be effectively guided scientifically. On the basis of summarizing the latest research results of traditional quality cost theory, this paper analyzes the factors such as customer satisfaction, failure mode and effect, such as (FMEA), quality loss and invisible quality cost, combined with the actual situation of SST Company. Further improve the elements of bad quality cost, study the formation of bad quality cost of SST company, find out the cause of its formation and put forward the corresponding improvement method. This paper first describes the research background, significance, content, methods, technical route and innovation of the research, as well as the latest research results and related theories at home and abroad in the field of poor quality cost. This paper aims at the implementation and application of traditional quality cost theory in SST Company, including the collection, analysis and improvement of bad quality cost information, combined with customer satisfaction, failure mode and effect analysis, quality loss and hidden quality cost, etc. On the premise of OPPM quality target, the classification and constituent elements of bad quality cost of SST Company are further improved. Secondly, this paper analyzes the data of the bad quality cost of SST Company, exerts the wisdom of the team, finds out the root cause of the bad quality cost, and puts forward the corresponding improvement measures and methods. The improvement methods are mainly from three aspects: process quality control, quality decision and management methods. This paper absorbs and draws lessons from a large number of advanced quality management experiences, quality control and decision-making methods at home and abroad, and combines the latest research results of scholars at home and abroad, on the basis of the implementation and application of traditional quality cost theory in SST Company. Based on the quality goal of OPPM, the component elements of bad quality cost are further improved, and the improvement strategy of bad quality cost is studied from three aspects: process quality control, quality decision and management method. And combined with the actual case of SST to verify its effectiveness.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:F426.6;F406.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙湘蓮,李世聰;隱性質(zhì)量成本的涵義及控制[J];財(cái)會月刊;2002年10期
2 張立寧;;淺談質(zhì)量成本控制方法[J];河北企業(yè);2012年01期
3 蔣家東,徐哲;企業(yè)質(zhì)量投入決策的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];航空標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化與質(zhì)量;2001年01期
4 王培欣;劉桑偉;;質(zhì)量成本控制模型的比較研究[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2006年05期
5 王曉妮;蘇寧;;淺談質(zhì)量成本內(nèi)涵[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2009年01期
6 尤建新,濮津;質(zhì)量損失的責(zé)任如何分擔(dān)[J];企業(yè)管理;2001年06期
7 張光明;工序能力指數(shù)的修正及其經(jīng)濟(jì)性分析[J];數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)與管理;1998年02期
8 尚珊珊;尤建新;;質(zhì)量成本與質(zhì)量水平關(guān)系及其模型研究[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2010年07期
9 尤建新,沈榮芳;質(zhì)量成本預(yù)測和管理方案決策的方法與應(yīng)用研究[J];應(yīng)用概率統(tǒng)計(jì);1999年04期
10 米子川;;基于全線質(zhì)量成本分析的質(zhì)量決策[J];中國質(zhì)量;2006年09期
,本文編號:2189399
本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/guanlilunwen/chengbenguanlilunwen/2189399.html