中国韩国日本在线观看免费,A级尤物一区,日韩精品一二三区无码,欧美日韩少妇色

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 管理論文 > 成本管理論文 >

石河子市社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的成本測(cè)算研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-08-11 20:46
【摘要】:目的:測(cè)算2012年石河子市社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目實(shí)際成本和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)成本,為政府在社區(qū)衛(wèi)生資源配置、合理制定公共衛(wèi)生服務(wù)項(xiàng)目補(bǔ)償政策、評(píng)價(jià)分析社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)績(jī)效等方面提供參考依據(jù),也為社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)改善管理、提高服務(wù)質(zhì)量和服務(wù)效率、降低成本等方面提供參考。 方法:通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)研究與專家訪談結(jié)合本地區(qū)社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的開(kāi)展現(xiàn)狀,確定完全成本法、作業(yè)成本法和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)成本法為社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的實(shí)際成本和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)成本的成本測(cè)算方法;其中通過(guò)半結(jié)構(gòu)訪談法了解石河子市現(xiàn)階段社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的開(kāi)展現(xiàn)狀及政府財(cái)政補(bǔ)償現(xiàn)狀,通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法獲得作業(yè)工作量、消耗人時(shí)、參與人次等基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)。 結(jié)果: 1.2012年,石河子社區(qū)高血壓健康管理項(xiàng)目的總成本為1449305.88元,人均實(shí)際成本為6.15元。 2.按實(shí)際管理的高血壓、糖尿病患者測(cè)算,社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為1765106.67元,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)人均成本為7.49元。 3.按患病率測(cè)算不同管理水平測(cè)算的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)成本⑴若100%管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為3068179.76元,人均成本為13.04元。⑵若90%管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為2859060.70元,人均總成本為12.14元。⑶若80%管理,,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為2649615.47元,人均成本為11.26元。⑷若70%管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為2440170.25元,人均成本為10.37元。⑸若60%管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為2230725.03元,人均成本為9.48元。⑹若50%管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)總成本為2021279.80元,人均成本為8.59元。 4.不同管理水平下成本測(cè)算模型 本地區(qū)人群高血壓患病率為34.08%,糖尿病患病率為10.80%,設(shè)管理水平為n%:人均補(bǔ)助標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模型為: y=8.9*n%+4.14,總補(bǔ)償金額模型為:y=2094221.46*n%+974221.315.不同年份的石河子市社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的財(cái)政補(bǔ)償預(yù)測(cè)模型TC={0.02*W(1+b3)*[0.608*M(1+b1)*n%+N(1+b2)]}/(1+b1)+IC(1+b4)+OC(1+b5) 結(jié)論: 1、2012年石河子市人均實(shí)際成本為6.15元,不同管理水平的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)成本均高于實(shí)際成本,存在財(cái)政缺口。2、人力成本是社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目成本的主要構(gòu)成部分。3、社區(qū)高血壓糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目的人員配備不合理,缺乏專職人員。4、社區(qū)高血壓、糖尿病健康管理項(xiàng)目管理不完善。
[Abstract]:Objective: to calculate the actual cost and standard cost of community hypertension and diabetes health management project in Shihezi City in 2012, so as to rationally formulate the compensation policy of public health service project for the government to allocate community health resources. Evaluation and analysis of the performance of community health services provide reference for community health service institutions to improve management, improve service quality and efficiency, reduce costs and so on. Methods: according to the present situation of community hypertension and diabetes health management project, complete cost method, activity cost method and standard cost method were determined as community hypertension by literature research and expert interview. The method of calculating the actual cost and standard cost of diabetes health management project, among which, through the semi-structure interview method, to understand the present situation of community hypertension, diabetes health management project and the current state of government financial compensation in Shihezi city. The basic data were obtained by questionnaire survey, such as workload, consumption of people and the number of people involved. Results: 1. In 2012, the total cost of hypertension health management project in Shihezi community was 1449305.88 yuan, and the actual cost per capita was 6.15 yuan. 2. According to the actual management of hypertension, diabetes patients, community hypertension, diabetes health management project standard total cost of 1765106.67 yuan, standard per capita cost of 7.49 yuan. If the standard cost is 100%, the total standard cost is 3068179.76 yuan, the per capita cost is 13.04 yuan, if 90%, the standard cost is 2859060.70 yuan, the per capita total cost is 12.14 yuan, and the total cost is 12.14 yuan. 3. 3 if the management is 80%, according to the prevalence rate, the standard cost is 100%, the standard cost is 3068179.76 yuan, the per capita cost is 13.04 yuan. The total standard cost is 2649615.47 yuan, the per capita cost is 11.26 yuan if the management is 70%, the standard cost is 2440170.25 yuan, the per capita cost is 10.37 yuan if 60% management, the standard cost is 2230725.03 yuan, the per capita cost is 9.48 yuan. 6 if the management is 50%. The total standard cost is 2021279.80 yuan, and the per capita cost is 8.59 yuan. The prevalence of hypertension was 34.08, the prevalence of diabetes was 10.80, the standard model of per capita subsidy was: yyang8.9n% 4.14, and the total compensation amount model was: yyyang2094221.46n% 974221.315. the model of cost measurement was 34.08, the prevalence rate of diabetes was 10.80, the standard model of per capita subsidy was: yyyyong 2094221.46n% 974221.315. The prediction model of financial compensation for hypertension and diabetes mellitus health management project in Shihezi city in different years, TC = {0.02W (1b3) * [0.608m (1b1) n% N (1b2)]} / (1b1) IC (1b4) OC (1b5) conclusion: 1. The actual cost per capita in Shihezi city in 2012 was 6.15 yuan. The standard cost of different management level is higher than the actual cost, there is a financial gap of 0.2, the human cost is community hypertension, The main component of the diabetes health management project cost. 3, community hypertension diabetes health management project staffing unreasonable, lack of full-time personnel .4, community hypertension, diabetes health management project management is not perfect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:石河子大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:R197.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盧祖洵,姚嵐,金建強(qiáng),李倩;各國(guó)社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)簡(jiǎn)介及特點(diǎn)分析[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2002年01期

2 劉杭生 ,程曉明 ,蔡卓 ,盛鋒 ,陳艷 ,于躍 ,李玲 ,彭巨亞 ,吳躍憲;保定市社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)項(xiàng)目成本測(cè)算與分析[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2002年08期

3 李玲,于躍,蔡偉,盛鋒,陳艷,劉杭生,蔡卓,程曉明;寧夏石嘴山市社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)現(xiàn)況與模式分析[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2002年12期

4 辛梅,曲江斌,林靜;濟(jì)南市社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)人力資源現(xiàn)狀調(diào)查與分析[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2004年21期

5 韓優(yōu)莉;焦忠毅;;社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)作業(yè)成本法成本核算方法研究[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2007年21期

6 王孝琦;何中臣;楊榮瀟;唐貴忠;;重慶市主城區(qū)社區(qū)衛(wèi)生服務(wù)中心的人力資源配置現(xiàn)況調(diào)查[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2011年13期

7 萬(wàn)美霞;陳永年;;社區(qū)基本公共衛(wèi)生服務(wù)按績(jī)效支付的成本因素探討[J];中國(guó)全科醫(yī)學(xué);2011年31期

8 雷海潮,侯建林,毛阿燕,胡海寧,吳國(guó)安,虞睿;公共衛(wèi)生機(jī)構(gòu)成本核算的思路、模型和應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年09期

9 喬楠;陳文;胡敏;蔣虹麗;;社區(qū)公共衛(wèi)生財(cái)政補(bǔ)助及其投入方式研究[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年02期

10 張媚;景琳;李玉強(qiáng);王慧敏;楊義;盧建磊;肖蕾;;城市社區(qū)公共衛(wèi)生服務(wù)財(cái)政補(bǔ)償資金績(jī)效:基于投入與產(chǎn)出問(wèn)題探討[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年05期



本文編號(hào):2178193

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://www.lk138.cn/guanlilunwen/chengbenguanlilunwen/2178193.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶1d2c7***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com