發(fā)布時間：2018-05-10 18:39

  本文選題：自媒體平臺提供者 + 信息管控　； 參考：《對外經濟貿易大學》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：本文主要研究的法律問題是,用戶在網絡平臺上發(fā)布與傳播的網絡信息被自媒體平臺服務提供者采取刪除、屏蔽等措施,或者網絡賬號被采取暫時封禁或永久關閉技術措施的情況下,該用戶可以要求自媒體平臺服務提供者承擔何種民事責任,侵權或是違約?本文的論述就是圍繞這一主要問題層層展開:首先,本文明確了探討這一法律問題的必要性,在用戶發(fā)布或傳播的信息被網絡服務提供者無辜刪除的情況下,人們常常潛意識的認為自己的網絡言論自由受到了侵犯,因此在理論上澄清這是否對用戶構成侵犯這一法律問題實屬重要,因為這不僅涉及到傳統(tǒng)的民事權利理論在網絡空間中的適用,還涉及到我們對于網絡自由的深刻認知。其次,基于web2.0技術模式下的網絡發(fā)展現狀、自媒體平臺的公共性等特點,本文在第二章中系統(tǒng)介紹了自媒體平臺服務提供者信息管控義務產生的法律基礎,以及這種義務的存在可能對用戶享有網絡自由帶來的消極影響,例如有償刪帖、錯誤管控、過度管控等失范現象的發(fā)生。在第三章中,本文以實踐中發(fā)生的具體案例作為討論問題的限縮線索和主線,深入分析了自媒體平臺服務提供者刪除用戶信息是否其三種權益:是否侵犯其知識產權,具體指的是知識產權中的發(fā)表權和信息網絡傳播權;是否侵犯用戶的消費者權益;是否侵犯用戶的言論自由。其中,本文重點分析了用戶信息被刪除與用戶言論自由基本權利受損之間的關系,并得出二者不具有等同關系的結論。在第四章中,本文主要對違約性的后果是否成立進行了討論和分析。在司法實踐中,曾有用戶以其與網絡服務提供者之間簽訂有用戶服務協議為由,要求法院判令對網絡服務提供者任意刪帖或查封帳號的行為構成違約�；�于此,本章主要對用戶與自媒體平臺服務提供者之間的相對性關系進行分析和考察,探究在類似案例中用戶以違約責任為由提起法律之訴的合理性以及在現實情況下面臨的困難,包括用戶注冊協議的效力,合同的無償性是否影響違約責任的承擔,合同中程序性義務的缺失等問題。在第五章中,本文在前幾章論述的基礎上,對于網絡空間中用戶對信息享有某種權利的觀點進行了探討和反思,即用戶是信息的創(chuàng)造者,因此其對于該信息有著絕對的支配權和壟斷權這種觀點。此外,這種觀點也將其與某一自媒體平臺服務提供者之間基于用戶注冊協議而成立的契約無限放大至整個網絡,進而得出了自媒體平臺服務提供者的行為屬于侵權行為。但事實上,如前文所述,當我們仔細研判種種侵犯的權利類型是否成立時,根據現有的理論體系往往無法得出恰當的結論。對此,本章所要討論的內容就是對這一現象背后的原因進行反思和探討,主要就兩個主要問題進行討論:第一,承載信息的網絡數據只是一種載體,還是構成權利體系中的客體?第二,當自媒體平臺服務提供者違規(guī)刪除用戶信息后,究竟是何種利益受到傷害?在第六章中,本文通過對自媒體平臺提供者信息管控的民事后果進行分析和探討之后,認為用戶在網絡空間中享有的是一種選擇性的自由與秩序性利益,從整個人類和社會的發(fā)展角度看,這種利益仍是需要加以保護的,但上升到絕對權的保護高度是欠妥當的,因為網絡信息一經產生便不具有唯一性的特性使得用戶無法對其進行獨占性的支配。
[Abstract]:The legal problem of this article is that the user can ask what people from the media platform service provider to publish and spread the network information on the network platform by the self media platform service provider to delete, shield and other measures, or when the network account is temporarily blocked or permanently closed. Responsibility, tort, or breach of contract? This article is discussed around this main problem: first, the civilization is sure to discuss the necessity of this legal problem, and when the information that the user releases or disseminated is deleted by the network service provider, people often subconsciously think that their freedom of speech is invaded. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether this is a legal problem for users in theory, because it not only involves the application of the traditional theory of civil rights in the cyberspace, but also involves a deep understanding of the freedom of the network. Secondly, the current status of network development based on the Web2.0 technology model, the public from the media platform. In the second chapter, this paper systematically introduces the legal basis of the information management obligation of the self media platform service provider, and the negative influence that the existence of this obligation may bring to the users' freedom of the network, such as the occurrence of the anomie phenomena such as compensated deleting, error control, and excessive management and control. In the third chapter, this paper As the clue and main line of the discussion, it analyzes the three rights and interests of the self media platform service provider to delete the user information: whether it infringes its intellectual property rights, specifically refers to the right to publish and the information network transmission in intellectual property rights, whether infringement of the user's rights and interests of consumers or not. This article focuses on the analysis of the relationship between the deletion of user information and the damage to the basic rights of the user's freedom of speech, and draws the conclusion that the two does not have the equivalent relationship. In the fourth chapter, this paper discusses and analyzes the establishment of the consequences of default. In judicial practice, there have been users in the judicial practice. On the basis of signing a user service agreement with the network service provider, it requires the court to order a breach of default. Based on this, this chapter mainly analyzes and investigates the relative relationship between the user and the service provider of the self media platform, and explores the users in similar cases. The rationality of the liability for breach of contract and the difficulties faced in the reality, including the validity of the user registration agreement, whether the compensation of the contract will affect the liability for breach of contract and the lack of procedural obligation in the contract. In the fifth chapter, on the basis of the previous chapters, this article is for the users in the cyberspace. The view that information has a certain right is discussed and reflected that the user is the creator of information, so it has the absolute dominance and monopolization of the information. In addition, this view also extends the contract to a certain self media platform service provider based on the user registration agreement. In fact, as mentioned in the previous article, when we carefully judge whether the types of infringements are set up, we can not get the proper conclusion according to the existing theoretical system. The content of this chapter is behind the phenomenon. The reasons for the reflection and discussion, mainly on the two main issues to discuss: first, the network data carrying information is only a carrier, or the object of the right system? Second, when the media platform service provider violating user information, what kind of interests are hurt? In the sixth chapter, this article through the self After the analysis and discussion of the civil consequences of the information management and control of the media platform provider, it is considered that the user enjoys a selective free and orderly interest in the cyberspace. From the perspective of the development of the whole human and the society, this interest is still needed to be protected, but it is not appropriate to rise to the protection of the absolute right. Once the network information is generated, it does not have a unique nature, which makes it impossible for users to dominate the network.

【學位授予單位】：對外經濟貿易大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923
，

本文編號：1870421