發(fā)布時間：2018-05-07 04:37

  本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權保護 + 出口商品結構��； 參考：《湖南大學》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：我國《十二五發(fā)展規(guī)劃》及2012年我國政府工作報告中明確提出“加快轉變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展方式,推進經(jīng)濟結構戰(zhàn)略性調整”、“推動外貿(mào)發(fā)展從規(guī)模擴張向質量效益提高轉變、從成本優(yōu)勢向綜合競爭優(yōu)勢轉變”的發(fā)展方向與基本思路。在知識與創(chuàng)新成為經(jīng)濟持續(xù)增長動力的今天,如何抓住全球經(jīng)濟格局調整的機遇,如何通過完善知識產(chǎn)權保護制度、改變出口貿(mào)易方式來促進技術進步,成為我國經(jīng)濟領域面臨的重要課題之一。那么,在這個復雜的經(jīng)濟系統(tǒng)中,知識產(chǎn)權保護、出口商品結構、全要素生產(chǎn)率三者之間存在怎樣的相互影響機制與作用途徑?我國產(chǎn)權保護制度在出口商品結構變遷中扮演了何種角色?我國知識產(chǎn)權保護制度的變革與完善是否影響了全要素生產(chǎn)率及其組成部分?本文以結構調整與技術進步為導向,以知識產(chǎn)權保護為主線,針對以上問題展開研究。 首先從概念、度量方式、發(fā)展趨勢等方面分析了我國知識產(chǎn)權保護和出口商品結構現(xiàn)狀,構建了區(qū)分初級產(chǎn)品、高技術產(chǎn)品和其他工業(yè)制成品三個部分的出口商品結構度量指標,綜合考慮我國立法與執(zhí)法兩個方面建立我國區(qū)際知識產(chǎn)權保護指標。不管是從專利授權、專利申請、GP指數(shù),還是考慮執(zhí)法情況來度量我國知識產(chǎn)權保護制度,我國知識產(chǎn)權保護程度在不到加強；無論是采用不同出口商品規(guī)模、出口增速,還是采用出口商品結構指數(shù)來衡量,我國的出口商品結構也存在緩慢上升的趨勢,且省域間的差異明顯。 為了說明知識產(chǎn)權保護、出口商品結構、全要素生產(chǎn)率的互動機制與作用途徑,本文建立了知識產(chǎn)權保護影響出口貿(mào)易商品結構的“四因素”理論模型框架、知識產(chǎn)權保護影響全要素生產(chǎn)率的直接與間接效應模型以及三者知識產(chǎn)權保護、出口商品結構與全要素生產(chǎn)率的聯(lián)動機制模型。知識產(chǎn)權保護通過影響交易效率、規(guī)模經(jīng)濟、技術創(chuàng)新、產(chǎn)業(yè)結構而作用于不同產(chǎn)品的出口競爭優(yōu)勢,進而影響出口貿(mào)易結構的變遷；反過來出口商品結構的變遷也通過傳遞外部市場需求、國際技術標準、競爭壓力等影響知識產(chǎn)權制度變革；在此基礎上,將勞動、資本、生產(chǎn)效率、知識產(chǎn)權保護納入內(nèi)生經(jīng)濟增長模型,深入探討了知識產(chǎn)權保護促進全要素生產(chǎn)率的直接效應,并詳細分析了知識產(chǎn)權保護制度如何通過作用于國際貿(mào)易、FDI等間接渠道影響一國的生產(chǎn)率。具體來說,最后,將知識產(chǎn)權保護、出口商品結構、全要素生產(chǎn)率置于統(tǒng)一的分析框架內(nèi),考察了三者間的作用關系及聯(lián)動機制。 實證研究方面,論文采用我國2000-2010年時間序列及31個省市的區(qū)際面板數(shù)據(jù),采用OLS、GLS、GMM、DEA、聯(lián)立方程等方法估計了我國知識產(chǎn)權保護對出口商品結構、知識產(chǎn)權保護對全要素生產(chǎn)率及其組成部分的影響效應,以及知識產(chǎn)權保護、出口商品結構、全要素生產(chǎn)率的聯(lián)動效應。實證研究結論表明：知識產(chǎn)權保護在一定程度上促進出口商品結構的優(yōu)化,且對商品出口的正向促進作用在高技術產(chǎn)品中更為顯著；但知識產(chǎn)權保護對于出口商品結構優(yōu)化的促進作用在不同區(qū)域之間并不一致,東部地區(qū)知識產(chǎn)權保護對出口貿(mào)易商品結構的正向促進作用在所有回歸方程中顯著；知識產(chǎn)權保護對全要素生產(chǎn)率具有顯著的直接作用,也通過間接影響貿(mào)易開放、FDI而正向作用于全要素生產(chǎn)率；在考慮到模型估計的內(nèi)生性問題后,面板數(shù)據(jù)的估計結果顯示,出口商品結構在10%的顯著性水平上具有促進知識產(chǎn)權保護的作用,知識產(chǎn)權保護對出口商品結構優(yōu)化的促進作用在5%水平下是統(tǒng)計顯著的,出口商品結構與知識產(chǎn)權保護共同推動了我國全要素生產(chǎn)率的提高,知識產(chǎn)權保護制度的完善、出口商品結構的優(yōu)化,有利于技術效率的改進。
[Abstract]:In China's 12th Five-Year development plan and the government work report of China in 2012, the development direction and basic thought of "accelerating the transformation of economic development mode and promoting the strategic adjustment of economic structure", "promoting the transformation of foreign trade development from scale expansion to quality benefit, from cost advantage to comprehensive competitive advantage" and basic thinking are put forward. And innovation has become the driving force of economic growth. How to seize the opportunity to adjust the global economic pattern, how to improve the intellectual property protection system and change the way of export trade to promote technological progress has become one of the most important issues in the economic field of our country. What are the mutual influence mechanisms and ways of the three people's commodity structure and total factor productivity? What role is the role of China's property rights protection system in the change of export commodity structure? Does the change and perfection of the intellectual property protection system affect the total factor production rate and its components? This article is based on structural adjustment and technology Guided by the progress of the operation, the above issues are studied based on the protection of intellectual property rights.
First of all, it analyzes the status of intellectual property protection and export commodity structure in China from the aspects of concept, measurement and development trend, and constructs the export commodity structure measurement index to distinguish three parts of primary products, high technology products and other industrial products, and comprehensively considers the two aspects of our national law and law enforcement to establish interregional intellectual property rights in China. Protection index. Whether it is from patent authorization, patent application, GP index, or considering law enforcement to measure China's intellectual property protection system, the degree of intellectual property protection in China is not strengthened; the export commodity structure of China is measured by the scale of different export commodities, export growth rate, or the export commodity structure index. There is also a slow upward trend, and the difference between provinces is obvious.
In order to explain the protection of intellectual property rights, the structure of export commodities, the interactive mechanism and the way of the total factor productivity, this paper establishes a "four factor" theoretical model framework for the protection of export trade goods by intellectual property protection, the direct and indirect effect model of the total factor productivity and the intellectual property protection of the three parties. Protection, export commodity structure and total factor productivity linkage mechanism model. Intellectual property protection is influenced by trade efficiency, economies of scale, technological innovation and industrial structure, which affect the export competitive advantage of different products, and then influence the change of export trade structure; in turn, the change of export commodity structure is also passed through the external market. Demand, international technical standards, and competitive pressure influence the reform of intellectual property system. On this basis, labor, capital, production efficiency and intellectual property protection are incorporated into the endogenous economic growth model, and the direct effect of intellectual property protection on the promotion of total factor productivity is discussed in detail, and how the intellectual property protection system is carried out in detail In international trade, indirect channels such as FDI affect the productivity of a country. In the end, the protection of intellectual property, the structure of export commodities, and the total factor productivity are placed in a unified framework, and the interaction and linkage mechanism between the three are examined.
In the empirical study, the paper uses the 2000-2010 year time series of China and the interregional panel data of 31 provinces and cities, and uses OLS, GLS, GMM, DEA and simultaneous equations to estimate the export commodity structure of China's intellectual property protection, the effect of intellectual property protection on the total factor productivity and its components, as well as the protection of intellectual property rights, and the export. The empirical study shows that intellectual property protection promotes the optimization of export commodity structure to a certain extent, and the positive promotion effect on commodity export is more significant in high technology products, but the promotion effect of intellectual property protection on the optimization of export commodity structure is in different areas. The positive effect of intellectual property protection on the export trade commodity structure in the eastern region is significant in all regression equations. Intellectual property protection has a significant direct effect on the total factor productivity. It also has a direct effect on the total factor productivity by indirect influence on trade, and FDI is used for the total factor productivity. After the endogenous problem, the results of the panel data show that the export commodity structure has the role of promoting intellectual property protection at the significant level of 10%. The promotion effect of intellectual property protection on the optimization of export commodity structure is statistically significant at the 5% level. The exporter's structure and intellectual property protection jointly promote our country. The improvement of total factor productivity, the improvement of intellectual property protection system and the optimization of export commodity structure are conducive to the improvement of technical efficiency.

【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F752.62;F124;F204

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 胡兵;喬晶;;對外貿(mào)易、全要素生產(chǎn)率與中國經(jīng)濟增長——基于LA-VAR模型的實證分析[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2006年05期

2 趙志耘;楊朝峰;;中國全要素生產(chǎn)率的測算與解釋:1979—2009年[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2011年09期

3 柒江藝;許和連;;知識產(chǎn)權政策的進口貿(mào)易效應:擴張或壟斷?——基于中國高技術產(chǎn)品進口貿(mào)易的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2011年01期

4 沈國兵;劉佳;;TRIPS協(xié)定下中國知識產(chǎn)權保護水平和實際保護強度[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2009年11期

5 梁紅英;余勁松;;知識產(chǎn)權保護與出口貿(mào)易:基于2000—2006分省面板數(shù)據(jù)的實證研究[J];財貿(mào)研究;2010年03期

6 丁紅林,羅建華;知識產(chǎn)權在經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中的作用及對GDP增長貢獻份額的測度[J];長沙大學學報;2004年03期

7 關兵;;出口貿(mào)易與全要素生產(chǎn)率增長的動態(tài)效應分析——基于中國省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的角度[J];國際商務(對外經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學學報);2010年06期

8 康博宇;陳心德;;模糊分析法在制造型企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權價值評估中的應用[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2008年09期

9 向錦;康贊亮;;我國出口結構的現(xiàn)狀及其優(yōu)化初探[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2006年07期

10 孔炯炯;;我國商品結構與雙邊貿(mào)易流量關系——基于引力模型的實證研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2008年01期

，

本文編號：1855463