發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-14 22:11

  本文選題：民事執(zhí)行 + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)��； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事執(zhí)行措施中網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)是在民事執(zhí)行程序中，人民法院對(duì)已被查封、扣押、凍結(jié)的被執(zhí)行人財(cái)產(chǎn)，在被執(zhí)行人逾期不履行義務(wù)時(shí)，通過(guò)第三方網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)、利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)自行實(shí)施拍賣(mài)進(jìn)行變價(jià)，并將所得價(jià)款用于清償債務(wù)的強(qiáng)制處分措施。其本質(zhì)是以維護(hù)債權(quán)得以實(shí)現(xiàn)為直接目的的、公法上的強(qiáng)制處分行為。它既不同于普通的網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)，也與民事執(zhí)行措施中的委托拍賣(mài)有顯著區(qū)別。這種拍賣(mài)實(shí)施的必要性表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面，一是以委托拍賣(mài)為主要形式的民事執(zhí)行措施中拍賣(mài)因存在腐敗程度高、債權(quán)人受償率低、拍賣(mài)效率低以及拍賣(mài)中法律關(guān)系混亂等弊端亟需改革，二是選擇網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)方式改革具有增強(qiáng)債務(wù)人償債能力、提高拍賣(mài)效率以及減少人為操作空間等優(yōu)勢(shì)。其可行性則體現(xiàn)在四個(gè)方面，一是現(xiàn)行的民訴法提供了法律支持，二是網(wǎng)絡(luò)的高速發(fā)展提供了技術(shù)支持，三是司法實(shí)務(wù)的嘗試提供了經(jīng)驗(yàn)支持，四是司法為民的提倡提供了輿論支持。 以2013年8月份在淘寶網(wǎng)司法拍賣(mài)平臺(tái)上進(jìn)行的民事執(zhí)行措施中網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)為對(duì)象進(jìn)行調(diào)研，顯示在拍賣(mài)效果、拍賣(mài)效率和拍賣(mài)的公正性上都具有不可否認(rèn)的優(yōu)勢(shì)。但亦存在標(biāo)的物范圍不清、主體間關(guān)系不明、拍賣(mài)的法律效果模糊以及程序性規(guī)則缺乏等問(wèn)題。完善民事執(zhí)行措施中網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)，應(yīng)該從構(gòu)建實(shí)體性與程序性規(guī)則這兩方面著手。在實(shí)體性規(guī)則方面：明確拍賣(mài)的適用范圍，劃清拍賣(mài)中各主體間的關(guān)系，確認(rèn)拍賣(mài)的法律效果，明確買(mǎi)受人既無(wú)物的瑕疵擔(dān)保請(qǐng)求權(quán)，也無(wú)權(quán)利瑕疵擔(dān)保請(qǐng)求權(quán)。在程序性規(guī)則方面：第一，構(gòu)建網(wǎng)絡(luò)異常應(yīng)對(duì)規(guī)則，包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)異常申報(bào)規(guī)則與網(wǎng)絡(luò)異常處理規(guī)則；第二，建立網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)監(jiān)管規(guī)則，包括防止拍賣(mài)核心信息知情人員競(jìng)拍規(guī)則、實(shí)地看樣規(guī)則與對(duì)保證金的監(jiān)管規(guī)則；第三，，完善拍賣(mài)信息公示制度，包括非首次拍賣(mài)的變價(jià)階段信息的公示和撤回拍賣(mài)、停止拍賣(mài)信息的公示。
[Abstract]:In the civil execution measures, the online auction is in the civil execution procedure, where the people's court uses a third-party network platform to seize, seize or freeze the property of the person subjected to execution, if the person concerned fails to perform its obligations within the time limit, Use the network technology to carry out auction to change the price, and use the price to pay off the debt. Its essence is to maintain the realization of creditor's rights as a direct purpose, public law enforcement action. It is not only different from the ordinary network auction, but also different from the trust auction in civil execution measures. The necessity of implementing this kind of auction is manifested in two aspects. One is that among the civil execution measures in which the principal form is entrusted auction, the auction has a high degree of corruption and a low rate of repayment of creditors. The disadvantages of low auction efficiency and chaotic legal relationship in auction are in urgent need of reform. Second, the network auction reform has the advantages of enhancing debtor's ability to repay debt, improving auction efficiency and reducing artificial operation space. Its feasibility is reflected in four aspects: first, the current civil litigation law provides legal support; second, the rapid development of the network provides technical support; third, the trial of judicial practice provides experience support. Fourth, the judiciary provides public opinion support for the advocacy of the people. The research on the online auction in the civil execution measures carried out on Taobao judicial auction platform in August 2013 shows that there are undeniable advantages in auction effect, auction efficiency and auction fairness. However, there are still some problems, such as unclear scope of subject matter, unclear relationship between subjects, vague legal effect of auction and lack of procedural rules. To perfect the network auction in civil execution measures, we should start with the construction of substantive and procedural rules. In terms of substantive rules, the scope of application of the auction is clear, the relationship between the subjects in the auction is clearly defined, the legal effect of the auction is confirmed, and the buyer's right to claim for the guarantee of defects and the claim for the guarantee of the defect of the right is clear. In the procedural rules: first, the construction of network anomaly response rules, including network anomaly declaration rules and network anomaly handling rules; second, the establishment of network auction supervision rules, including the prevention of auction core information insider bidding rules, Third, improve the auction information publicity system, including the non-first auction information of the change stage and withdraw the auction, stop the auction information publicity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 雷波;馮中越;;網(wǎng)上拍賣(mài)研究的進(jìn)展[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2010年02期

2 周亞峰;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)拍賣(mài)問(wèn)題的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年28期

3 馮嬌雯;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)司法拍賣(mài)芻議[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

4 馮嬌雯;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)境下的司法拍賣(mài)[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

5 劉萍;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)司法拍賣(mài)法律問(wèn)題探討——以浙江法院在淘寶網(wǎng)進(jìn)行司法拍賣(mài)為例[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

6 邱新華;;法院拍賣(mài)抑或委托拍賣(mài)——以法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的視角透析不動(dòng)產(chǎn)強(qiáng)制拍賣(mài)的制度設(shè)計(jì)[J];山東審判(山東法官培訓(xùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2006年05期

7 宣海林;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)司法拍賣(mài):爭(zhēng)議中的探索[J];中國(guó)審判;2012年09期

本文編號(hào)：1889677