發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-30 10:19

  本文選題：理財(cái)產(chǎn)品 + 法律性質(zhì)�。� 參考：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著我國(guó)居民收入的不斷提高，對(duì)于資金保值增值的迫切需要催生出巨大的市場(chǎng)需求，，這一需求帶動(dòng)了我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的誕生和發(fā)展。但隨著商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展，由此帶來(lái)的各種問(wèn)題也接踵而至并呈增多之勢(shì)影響著金融市場(chǎng)的穩(wěn)定和進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。問(wèn)題之一表現(xiàn)在法律性質(zhì)認(rèn)定模糊，學(xué)界和實(shí)踐中無(wú)統(tǒng)一認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，分歧較大，這導(dǎo)致圍繞銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品出現(xiàn)的糾紛問(wèn)題無(wú)法得到妥善解決，并且因?yàn)槿狈��?duì)法律性質(zhì)認(rèn)定的法律依據(jù)，各地司法實(shí)踐中處理結(jié)果不一，影響了司法秩序，不利于保護(hù)當(dāng)事人利益，也不利于金融市場(chǎng)的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展。對(duì)此，應(yīng)當(dāng)明確分歧爭(zhēng)議所在，統(tǒng)一認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，參照國(guó)外有關(guān)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，完善立法，確保在處理因商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品而起的法律糾紛時(shí)有法可依。問(wèn)題之二在于監(jiān)管措施滯后，存在較多漏洞，不能保證銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)安全穩(wěn)定運(yùn)行。首先，當(dāng)前各金融領(lǐng)域發(fā)生混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的現(xiàn)象層出不窮，而面對(duì)混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)，我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的分業(yè)監(jiān)管機(jī)制，只針對(duì)不同金融機(jī)構(gòu)加以不同標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的監(jiān)管，但對(duì)于金融機(jī)構(gòu)從事的具體金融業(yè)務(wù)卻無(wú)太多約束，這就導(dǎo)致了監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)面臨監(jiān)管難題，例如銀監(jiān)會(huì)面對(duì)銀行從事證券信托類業(yè)務(wù)時(shí)并無(wú)對(duì)應(yīng)的監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，且因其業(yè)務(wù)屬于證券監(jiān)管范疇，銀監(jiān)會(huì)也不宜采用證券類監(jiān)管標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，這就使得商業(yè)銀行發(fā)行的信托類理財(cái)產(chǎn)品面臨監(jiān)管真空，形成了金融市場(chǎng)潛在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)；其次，現(xiàn)有監(jiān)管措施和法律責(zé)任的規(guī)定有待進(jìn)一步細(xì)化和落實(shí)，如風(fēng)險(xiǎn)揭示問(wèn)題、宣傳和銷售環(huán)節(jié)的問(wèn)題、理財(cái)資金投向不清晰、客戶知情權(quán)缺乏保護(hù)、資金池運(yùn)作方式聚集風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、高息攬儲(chǔ)問(wèn)題以及市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入問(wèn)題等，雖然銀監(jiān)會(huì)就上述問(wèn)題都有相關(guān)規(guī)定，但或者規(guī)定不夠具體，或者在實(shí)踐中缺乏監(jiān)督和懲罰機(jī)制使得規(guī)定落實(shí)效果不佳。對(duì)此應(yīng)協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管模式與功能監(jiān)管模式，有效解決當(dāng)前混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)局面的監(jiān)管問(wèn)題，同時(shí)應(yīng)完善、細(xì)化監(jiān)管法規(guī)，彌補(bǔ)監(jiān)管真空，并且制定切實(shí)有效的監(jiān)督機(jī)制與懲罰機(jī)制確保監(jiān)管措施的真正落實(shí)。 文章主體分為三大部分。其中第一部分為概述，主要介紹了銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的概念、類型和當(dāng)前發(fā)行情況；第二部分則主要闡述了商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品法律性質(zhì)的界定，通過(guò)介紹學(xué)界和實(shí)踐中對(duì)于法律性質(zhì)界定的模糊現(xiàn)狀，提出自己的觀點(diǎn)；第三部分是商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的監(jiān)管現(xiàn)狀和監(jiān)管路徑，分析了當(dāng)前我國(guó)針對(duì)商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的監(jiān)管中存在的問(wèn)題，提出了改進(jìn)監(jiān)管措施的方法和建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous improvement of the income of Chinese residents, the urgent need to maintain and increase the value of funds has given rise to a huge market demand, which has led to the birth and development of financial products of commercial banks in China. However, with the further development of the financial products of commercial banks, the various problems brought by them are also coming and increasing, which affects the stability and further development of the financial market. One of the problems is that the nature of the law is vague, there is no unified standard of recognition in academic circles and practice, and there is a great difference, which leads to the problem that the disputes around banking financial products can not be properly resolved. And because of the lack of legal basis for the legal nature of the law, the results of judicial practice are different, which affects the judicial order, is not conducive to the protection of the interests of the parties, and is not conducive to the stable development of the financial market. In view of this, we should make clear the differences and disputes, unify the standard of confirmation, refer to the relevant experience of foreign countries, perfect the legislation, and ensure that there are laws to be followed when dealing with the legal disputes arising from the financial products of commercial banks. The second problem lies in the lag of regulatory measures and the existence of many loopholes, which can not guarantee the safe and stable operation of the banking financial products market. First of all, the phenomenon of mixed operation in various financial fields emerges in endlessly. In the face of mixed operation, the current separate supervision mechanism of our country only aims at different financial institutions with different standards of supervision. However, there are not too many restrictions on the specific financial business that financial institutions engage in, which leads to regulatory difficulties faced by regulators. For example, the CBRC does not have corresponding regulatory standards when banks engage in securities trust business. And because its business belongs to the scope of securities supervision, the CBRC should not adopt the standard of securities supervision, which makes the trust financial products issued by commercial banks face a regulatory vacuum, which forms the potential risks in the financial market. The existing regulatory measures and legal liability provisions need to be further refined and implemented, such as risk disclosure problems, publicity and sales links, financial capital investment is not clear, lack of protection of the customer's right to know, the way the fund pool operation risks, Although the CBRC has relevant regulations on these issues, the regulations are not specific enough, or lack of supervision and punishment mechanism in practice, which makes the implementation of the regulations ineffective. In order to solve the problem effectively, we should perfect and refine the regulations, make up the vacuum of supervision, and coordinate the supervision mode of the organization and the function supervision mode, and solve the problem of supervision in the current situation of mixed business operation effectively, at the same time, And establish effective supervision mechanism and punishment mechanism to ensure the real implementation of regulatory measures. The main body of the article is divided into three parts. The first part is an overview, mainly introduces the concept, the type and the current issue situation of the bank financial management product, the second part mainly elaborated the commercial bank financial management product legal nature definition, the second part mainly elaborated the commercial bank financial management product legal nature definition, By introducing the fuzzy status quo of the definition of the legal nature in the academic and practical fields, the author puts forward his own viewpoint. The third part is the supervision status quo and the regulatory path of the financial products of commercial banks. This paper analyzes on the problems existing in the supervision of the financial products of commercial banks in our country, and puts forward the methods and suggestions for improving the supervision measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.281

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖凡;;競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、沖突與協(xié)調(diào)——金融混業(yè)監(jiān)管模式的選擇[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

2 何育靜;拓展國(guó)有商業(yè)銀行個(gè)人理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)的思考[J];商業(yè)研究;2005年19期

3 黃韜;;銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];法人雜志;2008年05期

4 李景欣;劉楠;;銀行個(gè)人理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的法律分析[J];法商研究;2007年05期

5 陸徐元;;論我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品法律關(guān)系的界定[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年14期

6 吳素萍,徐衛(wèi)宇;功能性金融監(jiān)管的理論與框架[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;1999年06期

7 陳美蕓;;我國(guó)商業(yè)銀行個(gè)人理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及策略[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2007年07期

8 韓光紅;;淺析銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品的法律問(wèn)題與對(duì)策[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2010年12期

9 李勇;;銀行理財(cái)產(chǎn)品法律性質(zhì)辨析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)銀行武漢培訓(xùn)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

10 廖凡;;金融市場(chǎng):機(jī)構(gòu)監(jiān)管?功能監(jiān)管?[J];金融市場(chǎng)研究;2012年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊越;證券投資基金法律監(jiān)管研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

本文編號(hào)：2085949