【摘要】：國際商事仲裁臨時措施制度涉及到各方利益的平衡,也是公平和效率的平衡。臨時措施的決定和執(zhí)行是整個仲裁保全制度的核心。到底應當由法院抑或由仲裁庭決定采用保全措施,以及由仲裁庭做出的臨時措施在域外執(zhí)行力如何等問題,一直以來是法學界爭議和研究的焦點。 2006年修訂的《聯(lián)合國仲裁示范法》以及2010年8月15日新生效的《聯(lián)合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規(guī)則》都把臨時措施的改革作為這次修訂的主要任務之一,與之前的粗線條的條文相比,修訂后內容更加飽滿,操作也更加規(guī)范。《示范法》以及《聯(lián)合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規(guī)則》的修訂,為各個國家修訂本國的仲裁法起到示范作用,一些國家和地區(qū)也根據(jù)本國的實際情況以《示范法》為藍本進行了修訂。 本文以《示范法》以及《聯(lián)合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規(guī)則》為主線,對各個國家以及國際仲裁機構的立法與實踐進行了梳理,對當前國內外的研究進行了總結,就臨時措施的核心問題——仲裁庭發(fā)布臨時措施及其域外執(zhí)行——以仲裁庭的角度進行了評析,并且對于臨時措施多方關系做了法理分析,展望了臨時措施的發(fā)展趨勢。在此基礎之上,針對我國臨時措施存在的不足,提出了完善的意見,希望我國的仲裁事業(yè)能順應國際的潮流,立足本國的國情,在立法上作出適當?shù)男薷摹?br/>[Abstract]:The system of interim measures in international commercial arbitration involves the balance of the interests of all parties, as well as the balance between fairness and efficiency. The decision and execution of interim measures is the core of the whole arbitration preservation system. Whether the court or the arbitral tribunal should decide whether to adopt the measures of protection and the extraterritorial execution of the interim measures taken by the arbitral tribunal has always been the focus of controversy and research in the field of law. The United Nations Arbitration Model Law, as amended in 2006, and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, which entered into force on 15 August 2010, have made the reform of interim measures one of the main tasks of this revision, The revised text is fuller and more prescriptive than the previous provisions in bold lines. The Model Law and the revision of the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, It serves as a model for individual countries to revise their own arbitration laws, and some countries and regions have also revised the Model Law on the basis of the actual situation in their countries. Taking the Model Law and the Arbitration rules of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law as the main thread, this paper combs the legislation and practice of various countries and international arbitration institutions, and summarizes the current research at home and abroad, This paper analyzes the core issue of interim measures-the issue of interim measures by arbitral tribunal and its extraterritorial enforcement-from the point of view of arbitral tribunal, and makes a legal analysis of the multi-party relationship of interim measures, and looks forward to the development trend of interim measures. On this basis, aiming at the deficiency of the temporary measures in our country, this paper puts forward some perfect opinions, and hopes that the arbitration enterprise of our country can conform to the international trend, base on the national conditions of our country, and make appropriate amendments in the legislation.
【學位授予單位】：浙江工商大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 任明艷;;國際商事仲裁中仲裁員發(fā)布臨時性保全措施問題[J];北京仲裁;2007年01期

2 張恒;;論美國仲裁協(xié)會國際仲裁規(guī)則中的緊急保全措施[J];北京仲裁;2008年03期

3 王玉婷;;全球化下的國際商事仲裁臨時措施制度——兼論我國相關制度的完善[J];對外經貿實務;2006年04期

4 杜開林;對一起仲裁證據(jù)保全案的評析——兼論現(xiàn)行仲裁證據(jù)保全法律規(guī)定的不足[J];法律適用;2003年05期

5 潘偉;關于知識產權訴前行為保全的法律思考[J];法律適用;2004年04期

6 林一飛;論仲裁與第三人[J];法學評論;2000年01期

7 江偉，李浩;論人民法院與仲裁機構的新型關系──為《仲裁法》的頒行而作[J];法學評論;1995年04期

8 劉永明,王顯榮;“經濟全球化”下國際商事仲裁領域臨時保全措施的發(fā)展趨勢——兼論我國國際商事仲裁領域臨時保全措施的完善[J];河北法學;2003年02期

9 趙秀文;;《國際商事仲裁示范法》對臨時性保全措施條款的修訂[J];時代法學;2009年03期

10 劉俊霞;;2010年《聯(lián)合國國際貿易法委員會仲裁規(guī)則》評析[J];時代法學;2010年06期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 一言;[N];人民法院報;2001年

，

本文編號：2466928