發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-21 07:13

【摘要】：我國(guó)在加入WTO后的近十年國(guó)外針對(duì)我國(guó)反傾銷訴訟問(wèn)題日益嚴(yán)重，特別是2006年11月21日，美國(guó)對(duì)我國(guó)銅版紙產(chǎn)品發(fā)起反傾銷和反補(bǔ)貼合并調(diào)查，并開(kāi)始對(duì)我國(guó)出口的銅版紙產(chǎn)品征收臨時(shí)反補(bǔ)貼稅。而我國(guó)在積極應(yīng)對(duì)國(guó)外的“雙反”訴訟的同時(shí)也積極的采取“雙反措施”來(lái)維護(hù)自身的利益。 WTO體制下“雙反措施”已成為理論的熱點(diǎn)與難點(diǎn)。本文主要圍繞中國(guó)實(shí)施“雙反措施”的法律問(wèn)題展開(kāi)研究，采取理論分析與實(shí)證分析相結(jié)合的方法,從國(guó)際法和國(guó)內(nèi)法兩個(gè)層面，分析我國(guó)對(duì)外同時(shí)采取“雙反措施”的合法性合理性,在對(duì)目前國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)界提出的應(yīng)對(duì)策略進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合本案提出自己的一些建議對(duì)策，希望對(duì)我國(guó)今后應(yīng)對(duì)類似的問(wèn)題能提供參考。 本文分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分介紹國(guó)際對(duì)華實(shí)施“雙反措施”的概況，分析國(guó)際對(duì)華實(shí)施“雙反措施”的情況以及對(duì)我國(guó)的危害性，同時(shí)對(duì)于國(guó)際對(duì)華實(shí)施“雙反措施”的法律依據(jù)進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要分析。 第二部分分析中國(guó)對(duì)外實(shí)施“雙反措施”的基本概況，重點(diǎn)剖析我國(guó)對(duì)外實(shí)施“雙反措施”的情況、原因及我國(guó)學(xué)者對(duì)此的研究成果，同時(shí)指出我國(guó)對(duì)外實(shí)施“雙反措施”的法律依據(jù)等問(wèn)題。 第三部分是結(jié)合國(guó)際對(duì)華“雙反措施”的實(shí)踐指出我國(guó)對(duì)外實(shí)施“雙反措施”法律完善的主要建議，從反傾銷法和反補(bǔ)貼法的實(shí)體和程序方面加以改善。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years after China's accession to the WTO, the problem of anti-dumping litigation in foreign countries has become increasingly serious. In particular, on November 21, 2006, the United States launched a combined anti-dumping and countervailing investigation on China's coated paper products. And began to export our country's coated paper products to levy a temporary countervailing duty. At the same time, China also takes "double countermeasures" to protect its own interests. Under the WTO system, "double countermeasures" has become a hot and difficult point in theory. This paper mainly focuses on the legal issues concerning the implementation of "double countermeasures" in China, and adopts the method of combining theoretical analysis with empirical analysis, from the two levels of international law and domestic law. On the basis of analyzing the legitimacy and rationality of "double countermeasures" adopted at the same time in China and abroad, on the basis of analyzing the countermeasures put forward by the domestic academic circles at present, and combining with the present case, the author puts forward some suggestions and countermeasures of his own. We hope to provide reference for China to deal with similar problems in the future. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part introduces the general situation of the international implementation of the "double countermeasures" against China, analyzes the situation of the international implementation of the "double countermeasures" against China and its harmfulness to China. At the same time, the legal basis of implementing "double countermeasures" against China is briefly analyzed. The second part analyzes the basic situation of China's implementation of "double countermeasures" with emphasis on the situation, the reasons and the research results of Chinese scholars on the implementation of "double countermeasures" with emphasis on the situation of China's implementation of "double countermeasures" outside the country. At the same time, it points out the legal basis of the implementation of "double countermeasures" in China. In the third part, according to the practice of "double countermeasures" against China, the author points out that the main suggestions to perfect the law of "double countermeasures" in China should be improved from the aspects of substance and procedure of anti-dumping law and anti-subsidy law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 臧立;;WTO法律體系下實(shí)施“雙反”措施的合法性研究——由“美國(guó)對(duì)華銅版紙案”引發(fā)的思考[J];法商研究;2008年01期

2 陳立虎;趙艷敏;;美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)品并用反傾銷反補(bǔ)貼措施問(wèn)題研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

3 蔡映靈;;論我國(guó)對(duì)外反傾銷實(shí)踐的特點(diǎn)及存在的問(wèn)題[J];全國(guó)商情(經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究);2006年05期

4 陳萍;翁麗芳;;化工行業(yè)對(duì)外反傾銷及其對(duì)策[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年23期

5 丁松良;;歐盟反傾銷立法與實(shí)踐[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì);1998年11期

6 吳小國(guó);;非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位下中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)反補(bǔ)貼問(wèn)題之探析[J];銅陵學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 沈木珠;中國(guó)反傾銷立法評(píng)價(jià)及其完善思考[J];政法論壇;2004年04期

8 馬志毅;;美國(guó)的反傾銷立法和實(shí)踐(一)[J];中國(guó)中小企業(yè);2010年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李玉;同時(shí)使用反傾銷反補(bǔ)貼措施的法律分析及中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)策略[D];北京交通大學(xué);2011年

2 紀(jì)靈筠;我國(guó)對(duì)外第一反補(bǔ)貼、對(duì)外第一“雙反”案相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

3 陳云秀;美國(guó)對(duì)華并用“兩反調(diào)查”法律問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2461965