發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-16 12:09

【摘要】：海外投資保險(xiǎn),又稱海外投資保證,通常指海外投資者以東道國可能發(fā)生的政治風(fēng)險(xiǎn)作為保險(xiǎn)事由,向本國海外投資保險(xiǎn)機(jī)構(gòu)申請保險(xiǎn)并訂立保險(xiǎn)合同,由本國承保機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)政治風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的保險(xiǎn)責(zé)任。它是資本輸出國為了保護(hù)本國國民在國外投資的安全,避免政治風(fēng)險(xiǎn)損失而實(shí)行的事先預(yù)防、事后彌補(bǔ)的保險(xiǎn)制度。美國1948年首創(chuàng)該制度成效顯著,目前各主要資本輸出國相繼建立了相應(yīng)的海外投資保險(xiǎn)制度。近年來,我國海外投資迅速發(fā)展,但還沒有建立完備的海外投資保險(xiǎn)制度,這對我國企業(yè)制定全球發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略極為不利。建立有中國特色并且與世界通行做法接軌的海外投資保險(xiǎn)法律制度迫在眉睫。 本文分為四個(gè)部分,擬在分析我國在海外投資的立法和實(shí)踐方面的不足,比較主要資本輸出國家的海外投資保險(xiǎn)制度的基礎(chǔ)上,來完善我國的海外投資保險(xiǎn)制度。 第一部分介紹了我國海外投資保險(xiǎn)的現(xiàn)狀,先說明了海外投資和海外投資保險(xiǎn)的概念及特征,然后說明我國海外直接投資和海外投資保險(xiǎn)的現(xiàn)狀及特點(diǎn),通過數(shù)據(jù)的對比和分析,說明我國海外投資保險(xiǎn)相比迅速發(fā)展的海外投資顯得滯后。 第二部分介紹了我國海外投資的立法概況以及中國出口信用保險(xiǎn)公司的承保程序,從立法和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)方面來論證我國完善海外投資立法的必要性。 第三部分主要是說明我國海外投資法律制度的模式選擇,先分別闡述美國、日本和德國的海外投資保險(xiǎn)法律制度的模式,分析其優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)并進(jìn)行比較,然后針對我國的現(xiàn)狀,得出我國應(yīng)學(xué)習(xí)德國,采取混合模式。 第四部分是完善我國海外投資保險(xiǎn)制度的基本思路,包括承保機(jī)構(gòu)、承保條件、承保范圍、代位求償權(quán)、保險(xiǎn)期限、保險(xiǎn)費(fèi)和保險(xiǎn)金幾個(gè)方面,都是對美國、日本和德國的相關(guān)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行比較,然后分析得出適合我國的海外投資保險(xiǎn)的規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:Overseas investment insurance, also known as overseas investment guarantee, usually refers to overseas investors applying for insurance and entering into insurance contracts with their overseas investment insurance institutions on the basis of political risks that may occur in the host country. Insurance liability for political risk is borne by the local underwriting agency. It is an insurance system adopted by capital exporting countries in order to protect the safety of their nationals' investment abroad and avoid the loss of political risk. In 1948, the United States created the system to achieve remarkable results. At present, the major capital exporting countries have established the corresponding overseas investment insurance system one after another. In recent years, China's overseas investment has developed rapidly, but it has not established a complete overseas investment insurance system, which is very disadvantageous to the formulation of global development strategy for Chinese enterprises. It is urgent to establish a legal system of overseas investment insurance with Chinese characteristics and in line with the common practice in the world. This paper is divided into four parts. It is intended to perfect the overseas investment insurance system in China on the basis of analyzing the deficiencies in the legislation and practice of China's overseas investment and comparing the overseas investment insurance system of the main capital exporting countries. The first part introduces the status quo of China's overseas investment insurance, first explains the concept and characteristics of overseas investment and overseas investment insurance, and then explains the current situation and characteristics of China's overseas direct investment and overseas investment insurance. Through the comparison and analysis of the data, it shows that the overseas investment insurance of our country lags behind the rapid development of overseas investment. The second part introduces the legislation general situation of our country overseas investment and the underwriting procedure of China export credit insurance company, and proves the necessity of perfecting the overseas investment legislation from two aspects of legislation and practice. The third part mainly explains the mode choice of the overseas investment legal system of our country. Firstly, it expounds the models of the overseas investment insurance legal system of the United States, Japan and Germany, analyzes its advantages and disadvantages and makes a comparison, and then aims at the present situation of our country. It is concluded that our country should learn from Germany and adopt the mixed model. The fourth part is the basic thinking of perfecting China's overseas investment insurance system, including underwriting institutions, underwriting conditions, underwriting scope, subrogation right, insurance period, insurance premium and insurance premium, all of which are to the United States. Japan and Germany to compare the relevant content, and then analysis of China suitable for overseas investment insurance regulations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳t熭，

本文編號(hào)：2458768