發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-27 13:45

  本文選題：互聯(lián)網(wǎng) + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)在十幾年的時(shí)間內(nèi)迅速發(fā)展、席卷全球,影響了人類生活的各個(gè)方面,并且對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的法律體制甚至法律思維方式產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán),作為晚近才出現(xiàn)的侵權(quán)類型,由于其自身特點(diǎn),在全世界范圍內(nèi)愈演愈烈,并且在案件管轄權(quán)方面出現(xiàn)了極大的爭(zhēng)議和挑戰(zhàn)。本文從網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)的概念和特點(diǎn)出發(fā),分析了這種新型侵權(quán)類型對(duì)傳統(tǒng)管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的挑戰(zhàn),并通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)、歐盟、中國(guó)關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)的實(shí)踐以及海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議相關(guān)實(shí)踐的分析和討論,可以看到目前各國(guó)和國(guó)際社會(huì)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中管轄權(quán)確定上存在很大的爭(zhēng)議,尚無(wú)統(tǒng)一的做法,并且無(wú)論美國(guó)的“最低限度聯(lián)系”方法和歐盟《布魯塞爾條例》確定管轄權(quán)的模式都存在一定缺陷。最后從我國(guó)的實(shí)踐出發(fā),提出了對(duì)我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)管轄權(quán)的改進(jìn)與完善的建議。
[Abstract]:The Internet has developed rapidly in more than ten years, sweeping the world, affecting all aspects of human life, and exerting a profound influence on the traditional legal system and even the mode of legal thinking. Network infringement, as a kind of infringement that appeared recently, has become more and more serious in the world because of its own characteristics, and there have been great disputes and challenges in the jurisdiction of cases. Based on the concept and characteristics of network tort, this paper analyzes the challenge of this new type of infringement to the traditional jurisdiction rules, and through the analysis of the United States, the European Union, From the analysis and discussion of China's practice of jurisdiction in network tort cases and the relevant practice of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, we can see that there are great disputes between countries and the international community on the determination of jurisdiction in network infringement. There is no uniform approach, and both the "minimum link" approach of the United States and the EU's model for determining jurisdiction are flawed. Finally, according to the practice of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the improvement and perfection of the jurisdiction of network infringement in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.3;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 孫尚鴻;;試析歐盟《布魯塞爾民商事管轄權(quán)規(guī)則》有關(guān)涉網(wǎng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題的實(shí)踐[J];比較法研究;2009年05期

2 黃進(jìn);鄒國(guó)勇;;歐盟民商事管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的嬗變——從《布魯塞爾公約》到《布魯塞爾條例》[J];東岳論叢;2006年05期

3 王德全;試論Internet案件的司法管轄權(quán)[J];中外法學(xué);1998年02期

4 劉穎;李靜;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下的國(guó)際民事管轄權(quán)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年01期

5 肖永平,李臣;國(guó)際私法在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1810974